Is social media pushing up PR headcounts?

April 21, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Check out these figures and see if you agree with Bruce Hetrick, a long-time local public relations pro, that they shed another angle on the social media phenomena.

The federal government shows the number of people in the Indianapolis area pigeon-holing themselves in a category called “public relations managers” shot up just as the recession was building—coincidentally the same period when social media exploded.

In 2007, prior to the onset of the recession, 490 people in the Indianapolis area called themselves public relations managers. In 2008, when the recession was well underway, the figure shot to 600. A year later, probably because of recession-related layoffs, there were 550.

It’s a broad classification. It includes workers ranging from corporate inhouse communications experts to one-person shops. Many are in small businesses.

Hetrick thinks lots more people have gotten involved in social media for their work, thus self-identify with public relations. More will enter the field as the economy continues its improvement, he predicts.

When Hetrick speaks to communication majors at state universities, few aspire to work for news organizations. The days of wanting to the Woodward and Bernstein are long gone. Now, public relations student groups have dozens of members.

Demand will continue rising for people who can create communications and get the messages out through traditional means as well as social media, Hetrick says.

Incidentally, the recession didn’t dent the wages of those who survived the recession. The average was $73,130 in 2007 and built to $75,940 in 2008. By 2009 it had climbed to $76,770.

Thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Social Media or Decline in Advertising
    I tend to think a rise in PR people may be due less to social media and more to the demise of traditional media and thus paid advertising. I work in social media myself and as much as I wish to see more companies hiring staff to manage social media, that is not really the case. It's still the same PR person they hired to do PR who gets thrown social media most of the time. No new jobs are created. Instead I think it may be that there is a greater need for PR folks because companies are drastically cutting their advertising budgets. So roles may be switching from advertising managers to PR practitioners. I think companies still see the value in "earned" media which is more credible than "paid" media.
  • Decrease in reporters?
    As current president of the Public Relations Society of America's Hoosier Chapter, I'm pleased to see the increase in local public relations practitioners. However, my fear is that it is less a result of a boom in social media and more due to laid-off reporters who have turned to PR as their next career move. Whatever the cause, public relations is needed in any organization, large or small. Fair warning, though: Public Relations Executive was just named the second most stressful job in America!
  • The "Evolving" Door
    While there's no doubt that there has been a shift from what we knew as "traditional PR," I believe there has been an equal shift in the expectations of our clients. The difficult economy forced businesses to look long and hard at the dollars they were spending on public relations and ultimately place a greater emphasis on achieving results. The days of fat retainers from super-sized agencies are gone forever. However, I believe the increase in numbers we are seeing is directly related to the number of practitioners who were downsized and then launched their own small/boutique firms where overhead is minimal and mutually beneficial and respectful client relationships drive the business.
    Signed,
    A former reporter downsized from an agency who launched her own firm :)

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT