What does Facebook tell your banker?

September 26, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In her latest Small Biz Finance column for IBJ, Cambridge Capital Management’s Jean Wojtowicz writes about the criteria lenders are using to make loan decisions in this difficult economy.

Turn out that in addition to the expected factors like a borrower’s credit history and business plan, they’re increasingly weighing intangibles such as moral character.

Because most bankers don’t know their customers as well as they might have before mega-mergers changed the financial landscape, Wojtowicz said they’re looking for whatever information they can find before making loans.

So it’s entirely possible—if not probable—that lenders will search Google and Facebook for insight on potential borrowers.

That was a new one to me. I’ve heard of prospective employers checking out social media during the hiring process, but bankers?

I’m not sure how much my cat pictures and traffic rants reveal about the likelihood that I’ll repay a loan, but I don’t post anything online that I wouldn’t want my mother to see anyway. Not everyone is as discerning.

And as Wojtowicz points out, you only get one chance to make a first impression—even if it’s on the Internet.

What’s your take on the issue? Should character count in loan decisions? And is anything bankers find online fair game?

Join the conversation.

  • absolutely
    As a former banker (commercial lender/credit analyst), I say that this information is absolutely 'in bounds'. Character is, after all, one of the 5 c's.

    The purpose of the underwriting process is to mitigate risks. On an ever increasing basis, I keep reading about courts that find against businesses for failing to do such simple due diligence as a google search.

    Personally, I've found undisclosed tax liens ($100K or more), undisclosed law suits (repossession) and other items. How about when a husband and wife apply for new credit together, but then are talking separation/divorce online.

    On one website (googling my own name for kicks) I found an employee of mine bragging about stealing office supplies. As a lender, would I want to loan to this person?

    As I said, it's about risk management, bankers could care less about your personal life. The question is not should they be looking for the information, but what should they do with it once they have it.

    A failure to look is in a large part a failure of the bank.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...