Venture for America aims to help startups

October 12, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The New York Times had a piece this month on serial entrepreneur Andrew Yang’s vision for Venture for America, a not-for-profit that aims to put new college graduates to work at startups.

Modeled after the Teach for America program that trains recent grads for two-year stints as educators, Venture is planning a five-week boot camp for the first 50 fellows in June before they’re shipped off to jobs in Detroit, New Orleans and Providence, R.I.

Other cities would be added as Yang’s group works toward the goal of creating 100,000 jobs by 2025.

Participating companies would pay the fellows’ salaries, which the Times says will range from $32,000 to $38,000 plus benefits.

Yang hopes the program helps startups attract some of the top talent that otherwise gets picked off by major corporations looking for new blood.

That approach has worked for Teach for America, but as IBJ’s J.K. Wall reported this summer, the temporary nature of the positions is a potential drawback for schools.

What do you think about Yang’s idea? Will a program like Venture for America work in a city like Indianapolis?

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • The Orr Fellowship
    Since 2001, The Orr Fellowship has placed 115 Hoosier natives and Indiana college graduates in startups and high-growth companies around the city and state. As a part of the Orr Fellowship class of 2010, I'm happy to see this idea spread across the nation. Andrew Yang's mission to further promote entrepreneurship to America's top talent is a noble endeavor.

    As someone invested in both our city and the growth of small businesses, I'm encouraged to see the increasing amount of attention and effort being poured into the kind of companies that are creating jobs, not eliminating them.
  • Training
    I'm a student going back for a second degree in technology. It's amazingly difficult to gain the experience employers desire for entry-level positions right now. Startups require their employees to wear multiple hats. It would be a great skill-builder to get new grads into the marketplace while encouraging the growth of small business.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT