Flexibility lets firms focus on products, not processes

October 24, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Jon Arnold is a big believer in flexibility at work. As I reported in IBJ this week, Arnold is running Indianapolis tech firm Tuitive as he and his family travel the country in a recreational vehicle.

He has two full-time employees (who also work remotely), a roster of contractors and a steady customer base. He conducts conference calls in the woods and sets up his laptop on campground picnic tables. And still he meets deadlines and keeps clients happy.

Technology makes such things possible, if still relatively uncommon. But more business leaders are starting to realize that face time isn’t necessarily productive time. As local consultant Robby Slaughter told me, “Work is what happens when no one is watching.”

Some jobs need to be done in person, to be sure. And some employees need the occasional hairy eyeball—or the threat of it—to stay on task. But Slaughter said giving workers freedom also can pay off with increased productivity and better morale. Accountability and trust can go a long way.

“It’s really about empowerment,” he said, “giving workers the freedom and opportunity to take risks.”

Tuitive’s flexibility led the company to carve out one day each week when employees can concentrate on internal projects, instead of client work. The result was a pair of software startups that eventually could boost the bottom line.

What’s your take on the topic? Can small-business owners afford to loosen their control of employees’ schedules? Can they afford not to?

  • great topic
    I think this is a great idea. I am surprised no one has commented. I would love it personally. If I were the employer it would be difficult to gauge. it ofcourse would depend on the type of business. Someone has to answer the phone and greet customers.
    Also would this not make the employees sub contractors -1099 employees.
    I am all for it for myself, and i would do it for the employees especially if i wouldnt have to pay all the work comp and benifits - well being they are subcontractors.
  • Freedom is the Foundation of Success
    Reed Hastings, the CEO of Netflix, says that one of his major objectives is to "increase employee freedom as the company grows."

    Giving employees more authority reminds me of the old adage about giving employees access to training: you can train them and risk they leave, or refuse to train them and risk they stay. At worst case, a worker who abuses your trust self-identifies themselves as someone you should let go. At best, that trust becomes unbridled innovation and opportunity.
  • Remote Work and Outsourcing
    If you calculated how much time you or your colleagues spent on non-urgent, unimportant tasks, or how much stress it cost to deal with less than mission critical issues, you would probably pack it in and “head for the hills” the very next day.

    That’s why working remotely and outsourcing makes so much sense—we get to do what we do best (and love to do the most), and outsource the rest. The truest definition of personal productivity is doing less meaningless work, so you can focus on things of greater personal importance.

    Small business owners especially need to consider outsourcing since they usually wear multiple "hats" and aren't necessarily great at all of them...though they think they are! With the right mindset and skillset, managers can be surprised by how much more productive their employees can be.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.