Development groups form alliance

November 22, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Business Ownership Initiative of Indiana has big plans for its 15th year, including a new location, a new partner and a new strategy for delivering its services.

BOI has formed an alliance with local economic development group Develop Indy, which will share space—and other resources—with the not-for-profit.

DevelopIndy this week said the partnership is part of an effort to broaden its focus on  small-business assistance; it also unveiled a guide to help firms navigate the city permitting and zoning process.

Founded in 1997 as the Neighborhood Self-Employment Initiative, BOI provides business counseling, workshops and help finding financial support—including access to its $100,000 Glick Microloan Fund. It also operates the Central Indiana Women’s Business Center.

As part of the alliance, the four-person BOI staff will relocate to Develop Indy’s Chase Tower offices Dec. 1. Each organization will continue to operate independently, but BOI will benefit from cheaper rent and ready access to Develop Indy’s expertise, Executive Director Julie Grice said.

BOI also will decentralize its workshops and counseling, she said, partnering with neighborhood groups in four “focus corridors” to offer regular weekly services. “We will actually be out in the neighborhoods, developing relationships,” she said.

And she believes that “boots on the ground” work could help the organization attract corporate contributions, a priority for Grice given BOI’s reliance on grants to fund its $400,000 budget. She also is working on plans for a grassroots fundraising campaign and a website that could generate sponsorship revenue.

BOI is one of several local organizations that offer similar services to entrepreneurs, but Grice said there is plenty of demand to keep them all busy.

What do you make of the changes BOI is planning? Are there any unmet needs the agency should consider addressing?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT