Solving the tax debate

November 13, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Gov. Mitch Daniels has proposed capping residential property taxes at 1 percent of a homeâ??s assessed value, rental properties at 2 percent and businesses at 3 percent.

Now state Sen. Luke Kenley says the bipartisan commission on taxes he heads will offer a similar proposal. Kenley, a Republican from Noblesville, says the proposal will recommend cutting homeowner taxes even deeper than the one-third offered in the Daniels plan.

Are you happy with the direction Daniels and Kenley are headed?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • BrianNovember 13, 2007 2:13 PM
    Norm -
    Are any of the proposals immediate?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Steph MineartNovember 14, 2007 8:21 AM
    Neither the Governor's nor Kenley's are immediate. Orentlicher's proposal is the only immediate one, and the one that makes most sense to me. He did a presentation for our neighborhood association comparing all the proposed plans out there.

    I'm not good at talking the details; check out his website.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT