Starbucks, piercings and Band-Aids

May 1, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Some local Starbucks workers are looking like they tangle with cats.

Theyâ??ve taken to putting bandages over piercings to meet the letter of Starbucksâ?? dress code, which minimizes the number of earrings and other piercings visible to customers.

Band-Aids beat the hassle of taking them out, the workers say.

And perhaps assert a dash of flinty individualism.

Is Starbucksâ?? dress code appropriate?
  • So you can only be a little edgy/artsy in your dress and self expression at Starbucks?
    What happened to that Seattle slacker grunge look? Not corporate looking enough?
    I might be pretty conservative but think Gothic looks good with black coffee.
  • I think that Starbucks' dress code is appropriate. Those who choose to work in the foodservice arena should be conscious of how their appearance can at times make those they are serving uncomfortable. Perhaps I am more conservative than many others in my age group (I am 35), but I believe that in general, people have gone a bit overboard with regard to piercings and tatoos. Yes, everyone has a choice as to what they do to their own bodies, but in my opinion, too much of something can damage its original appeal -- and less is always more.
    • It is actually a health code issue not only a company policy.
    • How are piercings a health code issue? I'm more concerned if a worker is clean, washing hands, etc than whether or not their nose is pierced! It's Starbuck's choice to set their dress code, but I agree with the poster who said whatever happened to the edgy/artsy image they had in the past?
    • The facilities where piercings and tattoos are performed are generally regulated by state and/or local departments of health. The fact that a food service worker has tattoos or multiple piercings is not a health code issue, unless there is infection or some other factor that brings health code violations into question. Piercings in and of themselves are not a health code issue.

      I think it's mostly an issue of some customers not being crazy about being served food or drink by someone with multiple holes in his/her body. I don't blame them. I am one of those individuals.
    • How does a band-aid make the fact that there is a hole behind it less offensive?
      I personally don't care if the person serving my coffee has 1 or 100 holes in his/her body. As long as they are clean and friendly it's their choice. As a business woman if the number of piercings is a problem there is one of two ways to handle it. You ask them to take the pericings out (inforce a dress code) or not hire them. A dress code is a professional way of regulating your image. If an employee has a problem with the dress code then they should not have accepted the position.
      Placing a band-aid on it just leaves room for something to fall off and into food or drinks. Seeing multipule bandaids on a person is far more offensive than small metal objects.
    • As someone who has a daughter working for a popular retailer that hires and sells to many young people (often pierced, and often multiple times), you should know that there is a good number of people who will do piercings for friends (or just someone they met). These peope are not licensed in any way. That is where there might be a health issue - do you know if they person you are hiring or looking at got their pierced nose or eyebrow or navel or chin or (yes, some still get these) ear pierced at a licensed place or from a friend who might reuse needles or otherwise run the risk of spreading HIV, Hepatitis C, Staph (and what variety? resistant, MERSA, or??), etc. Although you might not worry about a piercing in an ear, eyebrow, etc., what about a nose, if someone has a cold, that is one more orifice for the spray to leave from and that surely isn't clean, but you wouldn't see it would you?
    • Mary,

      What? This may be surprising to you, but having HIV or Hepatitis C do not disqualify individuals from working in food service. An employer who refused to hire such an afflicted individual for a food service position would face even bigger problems from the resulting ADA lawsuit.
    • If you’re interested in details of Starbucks’ dress code, the company allows as many as two small or “moderately sized” earrings per ear, but no “visible” tattoos or facial piercings. There you have it.
    • All the more reason for me to support local, non-chain coffee shops with my hard-earned money.
    • starbucks blah
      I currently work at starbucks I have my lip and nose pierced. I also have about 20 piercings. I keep tem covered everyday witha turtle neck and I put bioplast in for my facial piercings. As for the bioplast I know im not suppose to have them but I buy the shorter ones, just to make sure you can't see it.I never asked was the bioplast okay to wear because if she can;t see it whats the point? so anyways rules are rules and if you can;t follow them then get te job that better suits you eith tatoos and piercings without the cover up just like i plan on doing in te future.
    • Really?
      I think your still being judgemental and close minded. Your offensive and territorial with no real sense of individualism. However, Starbucks gets to run Starbuck's like it wants to!

    Post a comment to this blog

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

    2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

    3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

    4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

    5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.