IBJNews

Star's union upset over newspaper's use of story

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Union leaders at The Indianapolis Star are decrying the newspaper’s use of a story written by a reporter more than three years ago that it repackaged as part of a recent advertising supplement.

The piece about summer camps, written by features reporter T.J. Banes in January 2007, appeared in a “summer camp guide” within the metro section of the March 23 edition.

Guild officers responded on Tuesday by asking editorial staffers not to allow reporters’ stories to be reused without their authorization as part of any in-house marketing or advertising campaign.

“It was an embarrassment to the ethical standards the Indy News Guild has been pushing Star management to uphold since 2006, when the company first presented the idea of having journalists produce and edit so-called ‘advertorial’ content,” the notice from the union said.

The request was part of a dramatic newsroom overhaul proposed by Star management that industry experts believe was a reaction to sagging revenue, as major advertisers evaporated because of corporate mergers.  

A stalemate with the union over the issue was broken in December 2006 when management of the newspaper owned by Virginia-based Gannett Co. conceded that, for the immediate future, editorial staffers would not be required to write ad copy. But management refused to rule out eventually raising the issue again.

The guild is upset now because it contends Banes’ story and two photos were used without the reporter’s or the photographer’s knowledge, and the content was manipulated to make it appear to be current.

Star Executive Editor Dennis Ryerson dismissed the flap as a mistake that will never happen again. He said it was his impression that the newspaper’s marketing department had requested to use an introduction written by a reporter for a past summer camp guide, not an entire story.

“It was bad communication; it’s not how we intend to do business,” Ryerson said. “Had I known it was a story, I would have never given my permission for use.”

Guild President Tom Spalding said he's pleased with Ryerson's explanation and he wants assurances that it won't happen again. The guild has asked to meet with management to discuss the issue, and it wants a guarantee that reporters and photographers will be notified in the future if another department reuses their work. Guild members have the right to have their bylines removed from their work if they object to the way it is used.

"What we're worried about is the staffing levels shrinking to the point where somebody has to [write advertorials]," Spalding said. "And we don't want that to fall back on the newsroom. We're busy enough with real news."

To management’s credit, the guild said, a clarification was issued, the story was pulled from the Star’s Web site, and an explanation was provided to Banes.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT