IBJNews

Star's union upset over newspaper's use of story

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Union leaders at The Indianapolis Star are decrying the newspaper’s use of a story written by a reporter more than three years ago that it repackaged as part of a recent advertising supplement.

The piece about summer camps, written by features reporter T.J. Banes in January 2007, appeared in a “summer camp guide” within the metro section of the March 23 edition.

Guild officers responded on Tuesday by asking editorial staffers not to allow reporters’ stories to be reused without their authorization as part of any in-house marketing or advertising campaign.

“It was an embarrassment to the ethical standards the Indy News Guild has been pushing Star management to uphold since 2006, when the company first presented the idea of having journalists produce and edit so-called ‘advertorial’ content,” the notice from the union said.

The request was part of a dramatic newsroom overhaul proposed by Star management that industry experts believe was a reaction to sagging revenue, as major advertisers evaporated because of corporate mergers.  

A stalemate with the union over the issue was broken in December 2006 when management of the newspaper owned by Virginia-based Gannett Co. conceded that, for the immediate future, editorial staffers would not be required to write ad copy. But management refused to rule out eventually raising the issue again.

The guild is upset now because it contends Banes’ story and two photos were used without the reporter’s or the photographer’s knowledge, and the content was manipulated to make it appear to be current.

Star Executive Editor Dennis Ryerson dismissed the flap as a mistake that will never happen again. He said it was his impression that the newspaper’s marketing department had requested to use an introduction written by a reporter for a past summer camp guide, not an entire story.

“It was bad communication; it’s not how we intend to do business,” Ryerson said. “Had I known it was a story, I would have never given my permission for use.”

Guild President Tom Spalding said he's pleased with Ryerson's explanation and he wants assurances that it won't happen again. The guild has asked to meet with management to discuss the issue, and it wants a guarantee that reporters and photographers will be notified in the future if another department reuses their work. Guild members have the right to have their bylines removed from their work if they object to the way it is used.

"What we're worried about is the staffing levels shrinking to the point where somebody has to [write advertorials]," Spalding said. "And we don't want that to fall back on the newsroom. We're busy enough with real news."

To management’s credit, the guild said, a clarification was issued, the story was pulled from the Star’s Web site, and an explanation was provided to Banes.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

  2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

  3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

  4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

  5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.

ADVERTISEMENT