State officials confident federal highway funds will come through

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State officials are so confident Congress will pass a deal to cover a shortfall in a federal highway fund that they have not solidified contingency plans that would be needed if the money runs out next month.

Will Wingfield, a spokesman for the Indiana Department of Transportation, said the agency has been watching the situation closely and has started to prepare plans. But he said officials feel “pretty confident” that Congress will step in.

“Generally speaking, the federal government has kept money flowing for infrastructure,” Wingfield said. “At this point, we do not anticipate any impacts to our projects.”

The federal Highway Trust Fund, which is financed with a per-gallon tax on gasoline, is set to run out of money next month, in part because cars are becoming more fuel efficient. And the U.S. Department of Transportation has said it will cut construction payments to states by 28 percent on Aug. 1 if Congress doesn’t act.

That’s important because the trust fund has allocated $37 billion to states for highway projects for the year ending Sept. 30 and is the source of most of the federal dollars provided to states for roads and infrastructure. However, the tax has not increased since 1993 and does not adjust with inflation.

Cuts mean projects across the country could be delayed, which the White House says could put as many as 700,000 people out of work nationwide.

Indiana receives more than 40 percent of its total state highway and transit funding from the federal government, according to the Pew Charitable Trusts. That money is used to match Indiana dollars for highway projects.

On Tuesday, the Republican-controlled U.S. House voted to cover the missing money in part by allowing companies to delay payments to pension plans, which in turn boosts their taxable income. The House bill also transfers money from an underground storage tank fund and customs fees.

The bill must now go to the Democrat-majority Senate, which is expected to take up the proposal later this month.

But out of concern about the shortfall and funding cuts, some states are holding back spending. Arkansas, which gets about 45 percent of its highway funding from the federal government, has opted not to move forward with more than $100 million in project bids, according to Stateline, a Pew website that tracks state activity.

Rhode Island officials have also temporarily stopped some new highway projects and Missouri officials are sticking only to maintenance for now, Stateline says.

But officials in Indiana say they believe a federal solution is near, even if it’s not a permanent one.

Laurie Mauldin, vice president at Appian, an Indianapolis-based transportation consulting firm, said that in the past, several short-term funding extensions were needed to find the best solution.

“We would absolutely like to see a bill as long as it is a good bill for Indiana,” Maudlin said.

The House fix will be one of those short-term solutions that will allow projects to continue, she said.

In the meantime, Indiana lawmakers have recently improved funding for roads and infrastructure, Wingfield said. That’s in part through additional appropriations but also by shifting the funding for some state operations away from the state gas tax to other sources.

Mauldin said that new funding has provided stability, especially in the last few months.

“The Legislature and the governor have increased state funding for state highways by about $800 million and about $600 (million) of that has gone to INDOT,” Wingfield said.

Rep. Dan Forestal, D-Indianapolis, serves on the House Roads Committee as well as an interim committee studying roads and infrastructure. He said committee members have not yet met this summer, but when they do, he expects that they will discuss future funding options.

“I would anticipate that we are probably going to have to” create legislation, Forestal said. “What exactly that looks like, I couldn’t say definitively.”


  • Kicking the can down the road
    GOP just kicking the can down the road, after having complained about Dems doing it in the past years.
  • Dependence on Feds
    Why do we depend on funding from the Feds? It seems more prudent fiscally to move away from this dependency and move away from federal mandates required to obtain funding. Money in government is like heroin...once you take it you are hooked and need more and more to get your fix. Everyone complains the Feds spend too much (they do) but then they keep taking money from the Feds...seems a bit hypocritical.
    Repeat after me - "We don't need new highways". Vehicle miles traveled in this country have fallen off from the peak in 2007 and continue to decline. There is no need for additional capacity. It's time to return control to the states - eliminate the USDOT and let states decide how they want to fund their own transportation solutions. Quit propping up our bloated infrastructure system with deficit spending and instead focus on projects that return a real ROI.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).