IBJNews

Study: Indiana tax code discourages small businesses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new study of Indiana's business tax structure suggests the state's tax code discourages the small, home-grown businesses often considered the engines of job creation.

The Ball State University study found several tax code inequities that result in larger, service-oriented businesses paying almost uniformly a smaller share of total revenue in state taxes than smaller, manufacturing-based firms.

The study by Ball State's Center for Business and Economic Research is provocative because it suggests Indiana's tax code discourages small, home-grown businesses that fuel job creation, said Michael Hicks, the center's director.

"The worse thing you can be in Indiana is a small manufacturing company that has organized itself as a corporation. These are exactly the kind of companies we want to be creating jobs," Hicks told The Indianapolis Star.

Hicks and co-author Hilary Fichter ran simulations for companies ranging in size from $1 million to $100 million in revenue and with differing legal structures, such as corporation, limited liability corporation, and not-for-profit. Their study also looked at a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, retail and personal services.

They then determined how those different companies would fare under Indiana's tax structure, which includes income, corporate net income, real and personal property, and sales taxes.

The study essentially found that the overall business tax rate favored some sizes, industries and corporate organizations over others.

Smaller companies generally had higher effective tax rates than larger companies because overhead tends to be higher for smaller firms, painting a fairly clear picture of the regressive nature of the states' overall business taxes, where — almost uniformly — larger businesses pay a smaller share of total revenue in state taxes, the report says.

The study also found that companies that produce goods had higher effective tax rates than companies that provide services. Hicks said this is because sales tax doesn't apply to services and because manufacturers tend to have more property than service companies.

Finally, companies organized as corporations in Indiana must pay 8.5 percent in income tax, while those organized as LLCs only pay 3.4 percent. As a result, big out-of-state companies like Wal-Mart that register to do business in Indiana as an LLC are taxed at a much lower rate than companies headquartered in the state, such as Eli Lilly and Co.

"This tax rate is an inequity affecting Indiana corporations rather than out-of state-companies with facilities in Indiana," the report says.

Gov. Mitch Daniels' office declined to comment on the report, but Indiana Economic Development Corp. spokeswoman Katelyn Hancock defended the state's tax structure in an emailed statement.

"Most Hoosier businesses pay the same income tax rate as individuals (3.4 percent) and Indiana recently lowered our corporate income tax rate," she said.

State lawmakers last year voted to reduce the rate from 8.5 percent to 6.5 percent over four years, beginning in fiscal 2013.

Hancock blamed uncertainty about changes to the federal tax code for any hesitation on new investment and hiring among Indiana businesses.

Business representatives agreed that Indiana's tax climate is competitive, but they also said the report reinforces the fact that it's not perfect.

David P. Lewis, Lilly's vice president of global taxes, said that even at the lower 6.5-percent corporate tax rate, "Indiana's taxation of businesses in the corporate form will remain higher than 19 other states."

"Remedying this higher rate, relative to Indiana's lower 3.4-percent individual income tax rate applicable to other forms of doing business, will further improve Indiana's already highly rated business climate," he said.

Indianapolis Chamber President Scott Miller said the study raises questions that warrant further study.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Perhaps if we treated employees better?
    Indiana still has the "brain drain" where those with education leave the state....to find better living conditions. Giving corporations every break and having the individual pay the difference is not a solution. While government has sold out to the business lobby....I hope the voters will work to bring back the working middle class.
  • and you wonder why I vote Libertarian
    "The worse thing you can be in Indiana is a small manufacturing company that has organized itself as a corporation. These are exactly the kind of companies we want to be creating jobs," Hicks told The Indianapolis Star. Damn, guess I'll move LumenCache out of Indiana. Too bad, will be creating about 50-100 jobs in the next 12-24 months. Made In USA is still easy to accomplish.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT