IBJNews

Study: Indiana tax code discourages small businesses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new study of Indiana's business tax structure suggests the state's tax code discourages the small, home-grown businesses often considered the engines of job creation.

The Ball State University study found several tax code inequities that result in larger, service-oriented businesses paying almost uniformly a smaller share of total revenue in state taxes than smaller, manufacturing-based firms.

The study by Ball State's Center for Business and Economic Research is provocative because it suggests Indiana's tax code discourages small, home-grown businesses that fuel job creation, said Michael Hicks, the center's director.

"The worse thing you can be in Indiana is a small manufacturing company that has organized itself as a corporation. These are exactly the kind of companies we want to be creating jobs," Hicks told The Indianapolis Star.

Hicks and co-author Hilary Fichter ran simulations for companies ranging in size from $1 million to $100 million in revenue and with differing legal structures, such as corporation, limited liability corporation, and not-for-profit. Their study also looked at a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, retail and personal services.

They then determined how those different companies would fare under Indiana's tax structure, which includes income, corporate net income, real and personal property, and sales taxes.

The study essentially found that the overall business tax rate favored some sizes, industries and corporate organizations over others.

Smaller companies generally had higher effective tax rates than larger companies because overhead tends to be higher for smaller firms, painting a fairly clear picture of the regressive nature of the states' overall business taxes, where — almost uniformly — larger businesses pay a smaller share of total revenue in state taxes, the report says.

The study also found that companies that produce goods had higher effective tax rates than companies that provide services. Hicks said this is because sales tax doesn't apply to services and because manufacturers tend to have more property than service companies.

Finally, companies organized as corporations in Indiana must pay 8.5 percent in income tax, while those organized as LLCs only pay 3.4 percent. As a result, big out-of-state companies like Wal-Mart that register to do business in Indiana as an LLC are taxed at a much lower rate than companies headquartered in the state, such as Eli Lilly and Co.

"This tax rate is an inequity affecting Indiana corporations rather than out-of state-companies with facilities in Indiana," the report says.

Gov. Mitch Daniels' office declined to comment on the report, but Indiana Economic Development Corp. spokeswoman Katelyn Hancock defended the state's tax structure in an emailed statement.

"Most Hoosier businesses pay the same income tax rate as individuals (3.4 percent) and Indiana recently lowered our corporate income tax rate," she said.

State lawmakers last year voted to reduce the rate from 8.5 percent to 6.5 percent over four years, beginning in fiscal 2013.

Hancock blamed uncertainty about changes to the federal tax code for any hesitation on new investment and hiring among Indiana businesses.

Business representatives agreed that Indiana's tax climate is competitive, but they also said the report reinforces the fact that it's not perfect.

David P. Lewis, Lilly's vice president of global taxes, said that even at the lower 6.5-percent corporate tax rate, "Indiana's taxation of businesses in the corporate form will remain higher than 19 other states."

"Remedying this higher rate, relative to Indiana's lower 3.4-percent individual income tax rate applicable to other forms of doing business, will further improve Indiana's already highly rated business climate," he said.

Indianapolis Chamber President Scott Miller said the study raises questions that warrant further study.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Perhaps if we treated employees better?
    Indiana still has the "brain drain" where those with education leave the state....to find better living conditions. Giving corporations every break and having the individual pay the difference is not a solution. While government has sold out to the business lobby....I hope the voters will work to bring back the working middle class.
  • and you wonder why I vote Libertarian
    "The worse thing you can be in Indiana is a small manufacturing company that has organized itself as a corporation. These are exactly the kind of companies we want to be creating jobs," Hicks told The Indianapolis Star. Damn, guess I'll move LumenCache out of Indiana. Too bad, will be creating about 50-100 jobs in the next 12-24 months. Made In USA is still easy to accomplish.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT