Success and Malcolm Gladwell

October 7, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
One of the biggest sociological buzz books in recent years was Malcolm Gladwell's "The Tipping Point," in which the journalist looked at the root causes of popularity--what are the circumstances that lead to a sudden skyrocketing of awareness

His next book, "Blink," examined the decisions we make in an instant--and whether those decisions are more or less reliable than those we agonize over.

I just gave an advance read through his next book, "Outliers," which is due out next month, and I'm guessing this page-turner will be just as talked about, if not more, than his previous two bestsellers.

His premise this time is that, when it comes to the best and the brightest (according to the galley's jacket copy), "we pay too much attention to what successful people are like and too little attention to where they are from: that is, their culture, their family, their generation, and the idiosyncratic experiences of their upbringing."

What does this have to do with arts and entertainment?

Well, Gladwell early on quotes studies that he believes establish that there aren't "naturals" when it comes to outstanding musicians (violinists, in his example). It really is hard work and other factors that takes them there, not genetics. And that specific kind of hard work is only encouraged under certain sociological conditions.

He takes that idea into pop music as well, making the case that the Beatles wouldn't have become what they became without playing approximately 1200 life gigs before they achieved "overnight" success in 1964. And to do that required, again, certain sociological conditions.

There's much more to the book. Gladwell soaks up information from studies of everything from Canadian hockey players to the pioneers of computer science in his quest to understand why certain people make it and others don't. What does rice farming have to do with mathmatical ability? How does a culture's attitude toward authority influence plane crash statistics?

And where, Gladwell asks, is the line between understanding the impact of culture and unfairly stereotyping?

Expect to hear much more about "Outliers" from the press--and from the people in your marketing department--after the book is released on November 18.

Your thoughts?
  • 'Sounds like an interesting read! I'll wait until I read it myself before I say more.

    But speaking of sociological conditions... I love that you wrote about Second Life in your most recent print piece.

    Some YA librarians around the country think that Second Life is the greatest thing since sliced bread for reaching teens and other library patrons who have not been in a first-life library building in years.

    Others say, I don't have enough time, money, or resources to do all of the work that patrons want and deserve from me, their local librarian, in my first life! How am I supposed to add a second life?!

    I confess that I am in the second camp, at least for now.

    And that's just at my day job. As far as my free time, as far as my consumption of art goes, especially theatre, I still prefer it to be live.

    However, I have heard two presentations from web 2.0 guru Sarah Robbins in which she touts the advantages of Second Life. (Maybe you saw her while you were on/in SL? She has bright pink hair and sometimes goes by Intellagirl. She works for MediaSauce company but is also working on a PhD through Ball State.)

    I might reach a tipping point about Second Life one of these days and create my own avatar.

    We'll see.

    Hope Baugh
  • I take exception to the author's claim that there are no naturals when it comes to talent. I've seen too many three-to-five-year-olds on Jay Leno's show and elsewhere playing advanced classical music on pianos, violins, guitars, banjos, or singing at levels far beyond their young ages. These kinds of talents are extremely rare, but they do happen. How does the author explain these?

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?