Super Bowl hopeful cities make their 2018 bids

Associated Press
May 7, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The three cities vying to host the 2018 Super Bowl entered the home stretch Wednesday.

Organizers in Indianapolis and Minneapolis held news conferences to say they had formally distributed their bids to the 32 team owners, though neither group was willing to provide many specifics to the public. New Orleans organizers were even quieter.

With a May 20 vote looming, nobody wanted to give away any secret strategies.

"It's a very competitive process," Indy bid chairwoman Allison Melangton said. "We've got 13 days to go and we want to take every competitive advantage we've got."

Sorting out this contest could be a tough one for the owners.

Minneapolis will have a brand new stadium by 2018 and is hoping to join the long list of cities that invested hundreds of millions of dollars in shiny, new facilities. The NFL has frequently rewarded those cities, including Dallas, Indy and New York, with Super Bowls, though not always on the city's first bid. Minneapolis last hosted the 1992 Super Bowl.

New Orleans will build its pitch around the fact it has hosted 10 Super Bowls, tied for the most with Miami, and would like the NFL's title game to be a prominent feature in the city's 2018 tricentennial celebration. When the city last hosted the game, in 2013, a blackout caused a 34-minute delay of the game between Baltimore and San Francisco.

Indianapolis had the fewest problems of any recent host and the 2012 game was widely praised by fans, media and league officials with only one major complaint — not enough downtown hotel rooms. Indy organizers noted in their 900-page bid that two more large downtown hotels could be completed in time for the game.

New Orleans is planning upgrades to the state-owned Superdome. Indianapolis is not planning any changes to Lucas Oil Stadium, and Minneapolis' stadium shouldn't need any work.

Organizers from each city will have 15 minutes to make presentations. Those three team owners will each have an additional five minutes to make their pitch. Owners will then eliminate the third-place finisher in one vote and eventually come up with a winner.

"New Orleans presented a very flexible bid allowing the NFL a number of choices in terms of how they would like to configure the Super Bowl footprint for official events and fan activities at multiple venues," said Sam Joffray said, a spokesman for the Greater New Orleans Sports Foundation.

Indy and Minneapolis have both been working on private funding to help cover the costs.

Richard Davis, co-chair of the Minneapolis effort and chief executive of U.S. Bancorp, told reporters that just within the first seven days of the drive, local companies pledged enough money to cover 75 percent of the estimated $30 million to $40 million needed to defray the costs. They expect to line up the rest within the next few weeks.

"We're going to celebrate winter. And we should, because we do it well — better than anyone," Davis said. "We're going to talk to the owners about how it's about time that the NFL brought America's game around the country, like a caravan, and started taking it out from the Southern states and bring it around to the rest of the world. We should be the first."

Indianapolis heads to Atlanta with roughly $30 million already pledged — enough to cover the entire cost of the host committee. That was a major selling point in each of city's two previous bids. Melangton also noted they planned to expand the Super Bowl Village, which originated with Indy's first Super Bowl, and will have another legacy project in the community.

Colts owner Jim Irsay, who hasn't been seen publicly since his March 16 arrest on preliminary charges of driving while intoxicated and four counts of possession of a controlled substance, will make the closing pitch. He's been undergoing treatment since March 18.

"There's no question he will be there," Colts COO Pete Ward told The Associated Press after the news conference.

Instead, the question is whether Irsay's presence could have an impact the vote.

Melangton doesn't buy it.

"A lot of running the Super Bowl has to do with the execution," she said. "And no city in the country has done that better than this one (Indy), hands down."


  • We Get Just As Much Publicity For A Monday Night Game.
    So don't give me this "good publicity" angle as a reason to blow, waste and otherwise throw away and burn any more money - public or private - to host a Super Bowl that only benefits a small cadre of select people and the one other commentator who evidently had a great time. Never in the history of this city has so much been spent on so few for so little tangible return than was spent to foist a super boondoggle down our throats. Another would be bordering on criminal in my estimation when there are so many other things this city need to do to not only "appear" to be a real city, but to actually be one. The arts. Education. Infrastructure. Investing in small business. Providing real incentives to bring other businesses here (the arts do this more than our sports teams). I just think a lot can be learned from a city like Pittsburgh that somehow manages to me more culturally relevant than us, a better sports town than us and doesn't have a need, driven by an inferiority complex, to host a super bowl. If we want to be a real town, stop the jock sniffing and let's be a real town. That takes more than fair weather sports fans and a small number of solipsistic self aggrandizers sitting around telling themselves how great they looked on TV on Sunday.
  • Worth the try
    Comments. They raised $30 million in "private" donations. Not public. Yes LOS was taxpayer (which personally I do not have an issue with) it is spent. So that is not an issue. Do I think we will get it. NO I agree that Minneapolis will. Not New Orleans not when the last time was a blackout. However look at it this way. We have a shot. People (radio newspapers) are discussing Indianapolis and how great a job we did. Free publicity. It NEVER hurts to remind people of how great you did. Who knows maybe we get it or maybe we get the National Widget Convention either way a win.
    • NO NO NO
      These (-----) just love to blow our tax money. When will the people have a say. And as for the person who "had a blast", I am very glad for you, and as long as YOU pay the bills, I don't mind Indy hosting the Super Bowl.
    • Long Term Sport Strategy Paying Off?
      Indianapolis has double, triple, & quadrupoled down on landing every major sporting event this country has to offer. There is no end to government & community support for the past five decades. More reason that the city could easily host this event as part of a regular host rotation.
    • It won't be Indy
      Let's think this through, Hoosiers. We got it for one reason only: because the state fleeced the taxpayers to build LOS. That was part of the deal, and if you don't believe that it was part of the deal in Minneapolis, you're naive. It doesn't matter how well you think we did, the Wilf's secured the same deal, so they're getting either 2018 or 2019. There's no way the NFL is doing 2 more cold weather Super Bowls in the near future, because NOBODY wants to come here when they could go to NOLA, Miami or Phoenix in early February. So Indy is out, ironically for the same reason Indy was in 3 years ago. Indy loses. Bank it.
    • No Net Loss
      The gross loss of the Super Bowl was around $1,000,000, (chump change for the city), which was made up for with new conventions that were brought to the city by the Super Bowl.
      • super bowl
        I hope we get it, the the economic impact was significant and my family and i had a blast besides!
      • say no to another super bowl
        the last time it was here they said it didn't bring the money in that they thought it would as a matter of fact they said they lost money so why will this be any different?

        Post a comment to this story

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

        2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

        3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

        4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

        5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............