Supreme Court takes up case on death records

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An attorney for an Evansville newspaper on Thursday told the Indiana Supreme Court that the public should be able to find out a person’s cause of death.

But the Vanderburgh County Health Department argued that state law says otherwise.

The Indiana Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a lawsuit the Evansville Courier & Press and Pike County resident Rita Ward filed against the county health department. The court is considering whether the cause of death listed on death certificates is a public record.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller filed an amicus brief – also known as a friend-of-the-court brief – supporting the newspaper’s argument, even though the state is not a party in the case.

“In keeping with the principles of transparency and accountability, we ask merely for a return to what had been the longstanding practice of making the cause of death in death certificates promptly available to the public who has the right to that information,” Zoeller said in a statement.

At issue is the difference between the death certificate and the online death registry, which are governed by separate state laws. State law requires counties to keep death certificates, which list the cause of death. But the state also maintains an online registry – and only spouses, immediate family or others with a direct interest have access to that information.

Vanderburgh County officials say they maintain all their records on the database. And because state law restricts access to that information, the public and the newspaper can’t obtain the cause of death from it.

The health department’s attorney, Joseph Harrison, argued that to receive the death certificate a person must meet the requirements and have “direct interest in the matter.”

“To me, the legislature has already spoken on this issue it is clear you can’t go to department of health and ask for the death certificate with the cause of death listed,” said Harrison.

But attorney Patrick Shoulders, representing the paper and Ward, argued that the statewide registry is separate from the health department’s statutory responsibility to maintain death certificates and release them to the public.

The Indiana Supreme Court took the case under advisement and will rule at a later date.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?