Susan Bayh as a political liability

August 19, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Barack Obama is expected to announce his vice presidential running mate any day now, and Evan Bayhâ??s name is still thought to be on the short list.

The Indiana senator is viewed as a moderate who would counter Obamaâ??s liberal voting record and be a draw for Midwestern voters.

But one of the downsides to a Bayh candidacy is his wife, Susan, who sits on a number of corporate boards.

Locally, she is a director at Emmis Communications, which has seen a prominent shareholder call for her resignation over the companyâ??s stock price, and WellPoint, which is a reviled health insurer.

Obamaâ??s campaign is reportedly worried about McCain making hay out of her corporate connections. (Imagine the ads: â??Evan Bayhâ??s wife helped deny insurance to people who couldnâ??t afford health care.â??)

What do you think? Should her corporate ties be enough for Obama to overlook her husband?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Wait, will he picking Evan Bayh or Evan Bayh's wife? If you are voting on what a VPs wife does or doesn't do or what she is intangibly tied to, than you are better off having other plans on that Tuesday in November.

    We need to vote based on a wide range of issues and opportunities surrounding a candidate, not these loosely based sideshows.

    However, you asked...

    By that logic with Ol' McCain, doesn't his Wife then contribute to Alcoholism, Drinking and Driving, Liver Disease, Sleeping with ugly people, raging parties, and binge drinking... as THE CHAIRPERSON OF HENSLEY & CO, THE LARGEST ALCOHOL DISTRIBUTOR FOR ANHEUSER BUSCH.

    Oh, not to mention Cindy McCain's publicly acknowledged addiction to prescription medication.

    Huh, the irony of ignoring your own wife to attack the wife of a potential VP is, wait, ummm, actually that's just American Politics, nevermind, much ado about nothing.

    Meet the New Boss, same as the Old Boss
  • Have to agree with CreamCrimson here. If a candidate can't win an election unless they bring up such a specious argument as their opponent's running mate's spouse possibly being involved in something that some people may not like then they probably shouldn't be running anyway.
  • In the grand scheme of things, how many times did we ever hear about Tipper Gore or Lynn Cheney in the past 16 years?

    Just sayin'...
  • I don't think that Susan Bayh has anything to worry about. It is more of a liability for John McCain that he has so many close ties to corporations. Take for instance the recent conflict in Georgia. One of McCain's top advisor has been a lobbyist for years for Georgia and this is not making that big of a public splash. Please see this link for more information, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/13/mccains-top-foreign-polic_n_118743.html.
  • I think Susan Bayh is more of a liability for her manners and
    lack of courtesy and respect to others. I also doubt Mr. Bayh is
    on any really short list. Who cares?
  • If Obama wants a running mate who is angry about lost jobs, then chances are Evan won't be on the ticket anyway.
  • as you hear some people say:

    I am not voting for Obama because...

    I have heard the following reasons before:

    -Black

    -Muselum

    -Will not support ... Flag ... Hand on Chest in Pledge... Not Patrotic... Troops ... End to Iraq.. So-N-So's beliefs... etc. (on support)

    -Associated Christian Church talking about DAMN America.

    -Too Liberal

    -Too Much Change is a bad thing

    -Potential VP's Wife not with Change

    - Never Served in Millarity before (well look at Bush)

    - Not Natural Citizen or born in America.

    - Will Let Terrorism Win

    and the list goes on.
  • I won't vote for Obama because he is a Socialist espousing Marxist policies and he would be very very bad for our economy. Period. Nothing on Random's list about Obama even matters to me.
  • Economist Major might consider reading this article, http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/11/news/economy/candidates_taxproposals_tpc/index.htm?cnn=yesbr+/.

    I'd also recommend he read Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations because it talks about socialism and how the state should support it's workers. A happy and healthy people are more productive. Then, he should check out Amartya Sen's Development as Freedom and how it discusses the disparities between the US (the richest country in the world) and Kerala, India (one of the poorest). Kerala's life expectency is a whole lot higher than some segments of the US. He's an Nobel Prize winning economist.

    Finally, if he does not want to read, he can just listen to this NPR story: http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/content.aspx?audioID=27093. It talks about how the US is lagging behind the rest of the world's developed countries.

    As I understand, the US controlled about 75 percent of the world's economy in 1968. By the 1980's it was down to 25 percent. Now it is even lower. During that time -- except for Carter and Clinton -- we've had only Republican presidents. The Heartland Institute recently released a report on reforming welfare and this was done in 1996 under President Clinton and it has had great success in many states in getting people to work. It was a great compromise and is effective in promoting change. Maybe Mayor Ballard and Governor Daniels should read these too!
  • I would hope Evan Bayh would not be picked for the obvious reason that he cannot take a stand on any issue to save his life. What a weenie!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT