Tax cheats, or just ignorance?

February 6, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
A third nominee to join the Obama administration has gone down in flames after revelations about problems with income taxes.

A Senate panel last night called off confirmation hearings for U.S. Rep. Hilda Solis, who was nominated to lead the Labor Department, after USA Today raised questions about tax liens filed against her husband.

Early this week, former Sen. Tom Daschle withdrew from his nomination to head Health and Human Services after his lack of reporting income on a timely basis came to light.

Also pulling out was Nancy Killefer, sought by Obama to become the first chief White House performance officer, after questions were raised about her tax record.

Perhaps the highest-profile tangle, Timothy Geithner, was confirmed as Treasury secretary despite concerns about his tax forms.

The string has left a lot of ordinary people wondering whether anyone of influence pays their share.

Itâ??s not as if the IRS is shirking its duties, says Carol Howard, tax director at Indianapolis accounting firm R.J. Pile & Co. If anything, Howard says, the agency has been cracking down to the point of doing more harm than good.

One Pile client recently received notification that he could not deduct $2.4 million in contributions made to charitable organizations in 2006. There was no explanation of the rejection, leaving the matter up to the client to prove the contributions were on the level.

â??Itâ??s going to get to the point where they keep poking people like this, and well, itâ??s like, whatâ??s the use?â?? she said. â??Youâ??re guilty until proven innocent.â??

So, if Howardâ??s experience reflects new IRS aggression, what do you make of so many nominees making â??mistakesâ?? on their forms?
  • I'm leaning towards arrogance over ignorance.
  • Who's there left to trust? Dems - no way, Republicans - not any more, just look at the screwball Gov of Florida, for example. Everything seems to be about power, greed and corruption. The Pres had his own links to undesireables and the starry eyed media chose to ignore because of his overwhelming appeal. After only two weeks in office, he's already beginning to show that the change he was talking about was not what Americans had in mind. What in the world we're ever going to do to get it right again is beyond me. I'm not sure there's a politician left we can trust.

    On point, the Fair Tax program, as promoted by Neil Boortz, would, among other things, do away with the evil and corrupt IRS. Do you think any of the lawyer loving members of the Dem party will ever let that happen to their buddies? Doubtful the Reps would ever get it done either due to defectors in their own ranks that are too lawyer friendly.
  • Maybe a good way for Washington to stimulate the economy, require elected and appointed officials to have their taxes prepared by a CPA. This will put money in the hands of CPA's who will then hire staff, buy computers, rent space etc.

    This would also reduce the time the officials are spending trying to avoid paying taxes and they can devote more time to actually working on issues. It amazes me that Geithner, who is very intelligent and highly compensated does TurboTax himself. He had a complex tax situation. I am sure a CPA would help him for a very fair fee.
  • Why doesn't someone in the media ask the obvious question, which is:

    If the tax code is so convoluted that even public officials don't know what they owe, how can they expect John and Jane Public to comply?

    Simplify the tax code!
  • Tedd, while the U.S. tax code certainly has its share of convoluted provision, the media isn't asking about the complexities of the tax code in the case of the recent nominees who were found to have tax violations because the provision they violated were generally NOT complex. While Geithner's situation of being an employee of the IMF may have been unique, his tax responsibilities were pretty straightforward. The IMF TOLD him he had to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, they gave him QUARTERLY reports telling him how much to report and pay over, and they GAVE him money to pay these taxes. I am sorry, but I fail to see how he was so confused.' As for Daschle, his excuse was that he was so use to having a car and driver that he didn't stop to think he had taxable income by having one provided to him by a company paying him a $1 million for consulting services. Gee, doesn't EVERYONE have a car and driver, dear? No these individuals were just tax scofflaws, plain and simple.
  • Plenty of tax cheats in Carmel. Everyone is a CPA, Lawyer, or can afford one. Greed and arrogance are the reaspns. Keeping up with the Joneses, etc. Very important here.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.