IBJNews

Tech firm ChaCha slices 28 of its 44 employees

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ChaCha Search Inc. has laid off 28 of its 44 employees since Friday, company co-founder and CEO Scott Jones confirmed Monday evening.
 
The Carmel-based question-and-answer service cut its 18-month-old social media division, Social Reactor, which paired advertisers with celebrities and other people with massive social media followings. The celebrities created content and drove traffic to advertisers. Most of the ads were Google Ads.
 
Earlier this month, Google’s algorithm for determining advertising rates reduced Social Reactor's rates by about 80 percent, Jones said.
 
“A week ago, we woke up to see our advertising revenue dropping through the floor,” he said.
 
The steep reduction in revenue meant Social Reactor was no longer sustainable, so ChaCha shut down the program.

Jones said the company made the move so it "could position ChaCha Q&A to be profitable."

"There was no impact to our ChaCha Q&A business, which has been stable and steady," Jones said in an email to IBJ. "The remaining staff is now fully refocused on the Q&A part of our business at ChaCha.com and via our iOS App."

ChaCha has had ups and downs since it was founded in 2006.
 
Investors have poured tens of millions of dollars into the firm, with the most recent infusion of funding being $14 million in early 2013.
 
But the company has had to compete against a trove of other Internet information services, such as Quora.
 
ChaCha had already trimmed positions, largely through attrition, before the most recent job cuts.
 
Jones and a handful of other industry experts hinted last year that one of the best avenues for the company would be an acquisition by Apple as it looks to improve voice service Siri’s search results.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • payroll
    what kind of "revenue drop" can destroy a company in one payroll cycle?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT