IBJNews

Tech startup Gusto lands $1.3M in venture capital

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Startup software developer Gusto LLC has secured $1.3 million in venture capital, the Indianapolis-based company announced Monday morning.

Elevate Ventures, which manages the federally backed Indiana Angel Network Fund, led the financing round.

Shawn Schwegman, a former executive at ChaCha Search Inc. and Overstock.com, unveiled Gusto in late February. The company's first product, known as Gusto, is available as a free iPhone app. It sorts emails, attachments and photos under tabs for better organization.

“We’ve been very impressed with the team,” Elevate CEO Steve Hourigan said in a prepared statement. “With the right talent and product-market fit, Gusto is well positioned to become a leader in this space where discrete digital solutions are converging for consumers and business users alike.”

In February, the Indiana Economic Development Corp. pledged up to $2.65 million in tax credits to Gusto on the condition the company meets its commitment to hire 150 people by 2018. Gusto also was granted up to $100,000 in training grants. The company had eight employees at the time of the announcement.

Schwegman previously told IBJ that hiring could actually reach as high as 250 people, with as many as 35 employees starting there by the end of this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not so fast Rhonda
    It's not necessarily ALL government money. The venture capital fund is backed by federal dollars (not state dollars). Is there a problem with an Indiana company employing Hoosiers with dollars that came from the federal government? Or do you think Indiana individuals and businesses collectively pay too little federal taxes that we should not be appreciative when those federal dollars come back to our state?
  • Bravo Gusto!
    I'm super excited to see Indy getting some impressive tech press and financial backing! jobs for Hoosiers is a win-win! I believe in your product and its writers! Bravo Gusto!
  • It's all government money!
    Ahh, so it's all government money. Had to read the story to discover that. In other words, it has no real market value. Government is notorious for investing in things real investors won't touch. Nice. Way to go, Indiana.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

    ADVERTISEMENT