The death of David Foster Wallace

September 19, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
A few weeks back, in my A&E Season Preview in the print IBJ, I picked as one of the highlighted events David Foster Wallace's scheduled talk at Butler University.

That won't be happening. The acclaimed writer, best known for his essays and his epic novel 'Infinite Jest,' committed suicide last week. He was 46.

When anyone electively dies, we ask ourselves why. When someone of such talent and acclaim dies, other questions are asked as well. Are artists more inclined to such action? Is the tradition of the tortured artist self-perpetuating? Does such extreme an act raise or diminish an artist's reputation? And what can be done to keep others from seeing suicide as the logical conclusion of a creative soul?

I'm not pretending to understand what led Wallace--or Phil Ochs, Sylvia Plath, Kurt Cobain, Ernest Hemingway, Vincent van Gogh, and many others--to this final act. But I know there are ripple effects in the culture...and in our lives.

Your thoughts?   
  • Oh, I am so sorry to hear this.

    I'll have to think some more about your good questions. I agree with you about the ripple effects.

    Hope Baugh
  • According to

    32,637 - number of suicides in U.S. in 2005
    (last year data is available)

    Every day 88 people die by suicide in the U.S.

    Every 40 seconds someone attempts death by suicide in the U.S.

    11 out of every 100,000 Americans die by suicide each year

    Untreated depression is the number one cause for suicide.

    Death by Suicide WARNING SIGNS include: Appearing depressed or sad most of the time, feeling hopeless, expressing hopelessness, withdrawing from family and friends, sleeping too much or too little, feeling tired most of the time, gaining or losing a significant amount of weight, making statements such as--I can't go on any longer, I hate this life, There's no point to this stupid life, Everyone would be better off without me, Life is not worth living, Nothing matters anymore, I don't care about anything anymore, I want to die, and/or any mention of suicide--writing notes or poems about suicide or death, acting compulsively losing interest in most activities, giving away prized possessions, writing a will, no sense of humor, facing a perceived humiliating situation, facing a perceived failure, feeling excessive guilt or shame, acting irrationally, being preoccupied with death or dying, behaving recklessly, irritability, frequently complaining about headaches, stomachaches, etc., neglecting personal appearance, a dramatic change in personal appearance or personality, performing poorly at work or in school, abusing alcohol or drugs, and/or inability to concentrate among others.

    If you, or some one you know, is experiencing death by suicide thinking, please GET HELP immediately (see website link). Death by suicide is not the answer!

    The desire to survive and the fear of death are artistic sentiments.
    - Salvador Dali
  • I think artists delve deeper into their own pain and pyche to bring forth what they need to understand, and to make others understand. The artistic process is very personal and often, a subconcious exercise. Actors live with their emotions very close to the surface, in order to bring forth experience on command. Musicians often find release in song. Painters and sculptors make tangible that which is intangible in their minds. And writers, well, writers may be the most tortured of all. There's a reason there's a whole field called art therapy.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.