The death of the CD

June 20, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Reports of the death of the CD aren't exagerated.

Wired magazine reports that Apple's ITunes store has sold over five billion songs.

Meanwhile, Price WaterhouseCoopers LLC released a report that sales downloaded songs will surpass that of CDs by 2010.

In other words, your jewel-cased discs will soon be going the way of the 8-track tape and the reel-to-reel.

What's different about this change, though, is that music downloads aren't just albums in different formats. They are a fundamentally different forms, obviously pushing the single instead of the album.

So is the long-form song set, with a specific order, dead? Will such works as The Beach Boy's "Pet Sounds" and The Beatles' "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" ever happen again?

Does the loss of this form make it more difficult for us to discover songs? Or are there plenty of other new ways now, such as Pandora, to discover unfamliar music?

And what will up-and-coming bands sell at the back of the club after a show?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • A lot of this stuff goes in cycles. My dad was telling me that when record singles came out people thought the death of the album was near. CD's were a huge boost to the album format again and now it is going in another cycle.

    The idea of a single is, obviously, you can buy only the song you know you like without getting a bunch of other junk. Also the idea of having thousands of songs all in one place (via your computer or MP3 player) that you can listen to with the click of a button is amazingly convenient.

    But at the same time I really enjoy buying things in an album format. It helps you to discover how much you really like a group. If all you do is download the 4 biggest singles of a particular group can you really say you are a fan? Also I will often buy an album based on one or two songs (if it's a band I don't know that well). If I hate the album I will probably never buy another CD again from that group. So yeah, I wasted 13 bucks, but at least I'm sure I gave them a chance.

    Anyway, I really doubt CD's (or some other form of music hardware) will die anytime soon. The quality a CD provides is far superior to an MP3 and it's really kind of a shame that so many people listen to music primarily in that compressed format. Each format has its advantages and IMO you are better off having a healthy mix of MP3 singles and CD albums in your collection.
  • I really hope that (if the CD format ends), the next Gen format will allow whole albums to be purchased. When I have enjoyed a song or two on a CD (from artists like Disturbed, Waking Ashland, Beck, etc..), I purchase the album and fall in love with the rest of the songs. In the rare chance that part or all of the rest of the album stunk, I would pull back and either not buy any more albums, or wait for someone else to purchase the album and listen to it with them.
  • I'm inclined to agree with Cycle, that the CD will NOT die soon, and for me I think the biggest reason is because of his last point: the sound quality. I don't mind a lower sound quality for some kinds of music, but when I'm listening to Mahler or any other my other favorite classical composers, I want the best quality possible.

    And on a much more shallow note, I get a great deal of satisfaction when I buy a CD, and tear the plastic wrapping off of it, and eagerly pull the booklet out to read it. And then I place it in its appropriate place among many other CDs on the CD rack, and the site of all my CDs is rather gratifying. (slightly pathetic, I know.)
  • The thing I like most about cd's is the ability to find obscure music from an artist. As great as Pandora and some of the other streaming radio/download formats are, the fact is, they often only carry 1-2 'hits' from lesser known but fantastic artists...

    As a side note--more often than not I wind up preferring songs from an artist that no one knows about--versus the 'hit' that the label and the radio stations *want* me to like--and I think many artists feel the same way.

    so i'm in the CD column...
  • Oh no. I'm still playing my Phil Harris on 78's. I have progressed to an electric turntable so I don't have to crank the machine.
  • The album will never be obsolete. People's love for music makes them desire more music from their favorite artists; beyond just the singles. The format may change, but the concept will stay the same. People love music and therefore artists will still have to record a whole albums' worth of songs, which will not all be hits.
  • Oh poop! I guess I'll put those CD's next to my Meatloaf Bat Out Hell and AC/DC Back in Black 8-Tracks.

    What happened to Stars on 45?
  • For those who are of a certain age, this is a bit like coming full circle only better. 78's and 45's were singles with flip sides that occasionally made the big time (think Rudolph of the Red Nosed Reindeer). Then 33 1/3 albums came along. Who doesn't remember being able to see the wear marks in the track or two that you actually bought the album to hear. Cassettes were great but hard to find your track and eight tracks were a fluke in time, so we welcomed the CD with outstretched arms, even though you could no longer see the wear marks :-) I-Tunes is everything great about digital AND those old 45's with the single you actually wanted to buy. I say hurray and why didn't the recording industry figure it out sooner - it wasn't like we hadn't been sending them a message since the 50's.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT