WellPoint's respite from criticism will be short-lived

June 24, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

All holidays must come to an end. And America’s health insurers, including Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., should expect no different.

WellPoint and its peers have been enjoying a nice break from their long-running status as Public Enemy No. 1 in the nation’s health care debate. Recent attention has focused heavily on hospitals and doctors and the chaotic prices they charge.

As readers of The Dose know, I have made my own modest contribution to this shift in focus.

This shift has occurred, I believe, because the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act put health insurers on a tighter leash, preventing them from engaging in their most controversial practices of the past.

No longer are insurers denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. When their premiums are now higher than 80 percent or 85 percent of medical claims, they refund the difference.

At the same time, health insurers have been able to keep premiums lower because health care costs have not been rising as fast as they had been—in fact, they even dropped in April, the first such dip since 1975. To no surprise, fewer families now report that they are struggling with medical bills.

Certainly hospitals deserve some credit for that trend—although most studies have credited either the slow-growing economy or the shift to high-deductible health plans.

Instead, with the health insurers on the sidelines, the main players left in the field to criticize have been the hospitals.

Right on cue, Steve Brill came out with his monumental article in Time magazine, which strung together a series of vivid anecdotes about how some hospitals—though certainly not all—aggressively mark up their services, taking advantage of the uninsured or those seriously ill with cancer.

Then came the Obama administration’s May release of Medicare data showing that hospital pricing varies wildly for no apparent reason. I have tried to explain how those variations came to be and, at the same time, how the data released is not terribly helpful.

Even the Healthcare Financial Management Association—the financial gurus working for hospitals and doctors—has now recognized the problem. HFMA announced the formation last week of a task force to address the issue of price transparency among its members.

“People want to know why health care costs what it does and what we’re doing about it,” said Joe Fifer, president of HFMA. “We need to move beyond the rhetoric.”

But I don't expect hopsitals to remain the public bad guys. It’s always easier to criticize the financier rather than the actual provider of services. That’s especially the case in health care, where hospitals and doctors literally save lives every day and health insurers have defined their job, as former WellPoint CEO Angela Braly once put it, as being the "disciplinarians" of the health care world. That will never make them popular, as Braly herself acknowledged.

As one case in point, WellPoint’s California subsidiary, Anthem Blue Cross, recently said it will raise premiums on small-business customers 11.5 percent next year. It blamed rising prices from health care providers.

In response, California Commissioner of Insurance Dave Jones said Anthem should be excluded from California’s newly created exchange for small-business health insurance policies.

"Anthem has engaged in a pattern of excessive and unjustifiable rate increases for its small employer customers and therefore they should not be permitted to participate in California's small employer health Exchange,” Jones said in a prepared statement.

The folks at WellPoint should expect California to be a harbinger of things to come.

  • Post 2014
    Everything in health care is about to change. Don't be surprised next year if the line between payer and provider of health care starts to blur. If you can't underwrite risk then you are only left with managing it. This is what is about to happen. Managed Care! Health plans going to go back to the look like HMO of 80's. Don't be surprise if you Doctor's name is listed on your insurance card. www.indianahealthinsurance.com
    • HMOs making a comeback
      Tony, You're exactly right that we're going to see a return of managed care. It was, indeed, successful at controlling health care spending in the mid-1990s. But it also proved extremely unpopular. And I think payers got the blame more than providers. We'll see what happens if organizations like Franciscan ACO or IU Health ACO start getting a backlash from patients, whether providers suffer reputationally this time. I suspect, however, that a patient that has a bad experience at say, IU health, but is a member of an Anthem ACO, will blame Anthem before he or she blames IU Health. But I could be wrong. We'll have to watch and see.

    Post a comment to this blog

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1