WellPoint's respite from criticism will be short-lived

June 24, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

All holidays must come to an end. And America’s health insurers, including Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., should expect no different.

WellPoint and its peers have been enjoying a nice break from their long-running status as Public Enemy No. 1 in the nation’s health care debate. Recent attention has focused heavily on hospitals and doctors and the chaotic prices they charge.

As readers of The Dose know, I have made my own modest contribution to this shift in focus.

This shift has occurred, I believe, because the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act put health insurers on a tighter leash, preventing them from engaging in their most controversial practices of the past.

No longer are insurers denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. When their premiums are now higher than 80 percent or 85 percent of medical claims, they refund the difference.

At the same time, health insurers have been able to keep premiums lower because health care costs have not been rising as fast as they had been—in fact, they even dropped in April, the first such dip since 1975. To no surprise, fewer families now report that they are struggling with medical bills.

Certainly hospitals deserve some credit for that trend—although most studies have credited either the slow-growing economy or the shift to high-deductible health plans.

Instead, with the health insurers on the sidelines, the main players left in the field to criticize have been the hospitals.

Right on cue, Steve Brill came out with his monumental article in Time magazine, which strung together a series of vivid anecdotes about how some hospitals—though certainly not all—aggressively mark up their services, taking advantage of the uninsured or those seriously ill with cancer.

Then came the Obama administration’s May release of Medicare data showing that hospital pricing varies wildly for no apparent reason. I have tried to explain how those variations came to be and, at the same time, how the data released is not terribly helpful.

Even the Healthcare Financial Management Association—the financial gurus working for hospitals and doctors—has now recognized the problem. HFMA announced the formation last week of a task force to address the issue of price transparency among its members.

“People want to know why health care costs what it does and what we’re doing about it,” said Joe Fifer, president of HFMA. “We need to move beyond the rhetoric.”

But I don't expect hopsitals to remain the public bad guys. It’s always easier to criticize the financier rather than the actual provider of services. That’s especially the case in health care, where hospitals and doctors literally save lives every day and health insurers have defined their job, as former WellPoint CEO Angela Braly once put it, as being the "disciplinarians" of the health care world. That will never make them popular, as Braly herself acknowledged.

As one case in point, WellPoint’s California subsidiary, Anthem Blue Cross, recently said it will raise premiums on small-business customers 11.5 percent next year. It blamed rising prices from health care providers.

In response, California Commissioner of Insurance Dave Jones said Anthem should be excluded from California’s newly created exchange for small-business health insurance policies.

"Anthem has engaged in a pattern of excessive and unjustifiable rate increases for its small employer customers and therefore they should not be permitted to participate in California's small employer health Exchange,” Jones said in a prepared statement.

The folks at WellPoint should expect California to be a harbinger of things to come.

  • Post 2014
    Everything in health care is about to change. Don't be surprised next year if the line between payer and provider of health care starts to blur. If you can't underwrite risk then you are only left with managing it. This is what is about to happen. Managed Care! Health plans going to go back to the look like HMO of 80's. Don't be surprise if you Doctor's name is listed on your insurance card. www.indianahealthinsurance.com
    • HMOs making a comeback
      Tony, You're exactly right that we're going to see a return of managed care. It was, indeed, successful at controlling health care spending in the mid-1990s. But it also proved extremely unpopular. And I think payers got the blame more than providers. We'll see what happens if organizations like Franciscan ACO or IU Health ACO start getting a backlash from patients, whether providers suffer reputationally this time. I suspect, however, that a patient that has a bad experience at say, IU health, but is a member of an Anthem ACO, will blame Anthem before he or she blames IU Health. But I could be wrong. We'll have to watch and see.

    Post a comment to this blog

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing