Want Cliffs Notes on health reform? Look at Wishard

July 10, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

So much is changing in health care, it’s hard to have a sense of where things are going.

So here’s the quickest shortcut I know: Look at Wishard Health Services.

I was reminded of Wishard’s usefulness as a Cliffs Notes-type guide to the future while listening Tuesday to a presentation by Dr. Lisa Harris, who has been CEO of Wishard since 2004.

Soon to change its name to Eskenazi Health, the county-owned hospital system in Indianapolis continues to stand out because it is actually implementing a model that tries to promote patients’ health, rather than merely treat their diseases.

And that model is made possible by significant public support.

The future of health care under Obamacare and the demographic challenges produced by retiring baby boomers is exactly that—and is exactly opposite of how most hospitals operate now.

Wishard is already a big user of comparative-effectiveness data about drugs and medical devices. Harris said its formulary includes all the pharmaceuticals shown to be clearly better than competitors.

“The me-toos are not," Harris added. The result has been that Wishard's annual spending on drugs has been flat at about $30 million for the past decade.

Because the 339 beds at Wishard’s hospital downtown are filled 95 percent of the time—an occupancy rate about 50 percent higher than most of Indianapolis’ private hospitals—Wishard tries to treat patients as much as possible in its 10 clinics spread around Indianapolis.

Wishard is building a $754 million hospital, which will open in December. But unlike most hospitals built around Indianapolis in the past three decades, this one will replace an existing facility.

The new hospital will be 30 percent smaller and yet be designed better, so it can accommodate 20 percent more patients, Harris said.

It even has been reaching into patients’ homes. Wishard purchased apartment buildings to serve as transitional housing for homeless and mentally ill patients, so they make fewer visits to the Wishard ER. For the same reason, Wishard works with local lawyers to get landlords to clean up mold-infested housing units, to prevent asthma attacks and other maladies.

Also, Wishard’s GRACE program sends nurses and social workers to the homes of low-income seniors to check up on their health and habits. The program was shown to reduce hospitalizations 44 percent.

Reducing hospitalizations will be the name of the game for all hospitals as new payment models being adopted by both government health plans and private health insurers make any growth in reimbursement payments hinge on how well hospitals reduce medical spending.

“Everything we do in health care affects pre-mature mortality by only 10 percent,” Harris said in her presentation to the Employers Forum of Indiana. “We’re going to be getting very serious about the other 90 percent.”

Wishard does preventive screenings. For example, Harris said, it screens every patient for depression and substance abuse because those factors have been shown to make it far harder for a patient to control an expensive chronic disease, such as diabetes.

And Wishard uses electronic medical records to manage a specific population of patients. The hospital launched one of the nation’s first digitized record systems back in the 1970s and in conjunction with the Indianapolis-based Regenstrief Institute Inc. has pioneered several uses of such records to improve care and lower costs.

I gave a detailed rundown of the Wishard-Regenstrief accomplishments in this article.

The reason Wishard does all these things is the same reason the rest of health care is moving toward it: It has no other financial option.

Of Wishard’s patients, 40 percent have no insurance—a rate nearly 10 times as high as experienced by Indianapolis’ privately run hospitals.

Nearly half of Wishard’s patients are on either Medicare or Medicaid—patients that privately run hospitals say they lose money on.

Only 12 percent of Wishard’s patients have private insurance—and most of those are its own employees.

In that kind of financial environment, Harris said, “you develop a system that works to put resources to best advantage.”

Indianapolis’ other hospitals are now starting to do the same. Their challenge, however, is to make this model work without the special public support Wishard enjoys/requires.

Wishard relies on special payments ranging from $15 million to $40 million from the Medicaid programs and $25 million a year in taxpayer support, to make its model work. Also, special governmental revenue from the bevy of nursing home licenses it owns brings in $155 million a year, which helps offset Wishard’s losses and helps pay the debt services on Wishard’s new hospital.

All told, these special payments are $200 million, paying for a huge chunk of Wishard's annual expenses of $520 million.

Can other hospitals adopt the Wishard model and still survive financially? That’s the question for the future of health care.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • What ???
    "... Wishard tries to treat patients as much as possible in its 10 clinics ..."? As opposed to what - not trying to treat them? Did a reporter actually write this stuff?
    • hardly a model to follow
      Nearly $200 million in subsidies? None of the other private Indpls hospitals enjoy/require such a huge subsidy. Nearly all rural hospitals across the state have at least 50% Medicaid/Medicare.
    • Hopefully...
      Hopefully Wishard/Eskanazi Health will update their communication systems. As a Wishard patient (because I lost my insurance) I have been continually frustrated by the lack of communication both with me and internally that happens. I spent more than 3/4 of last year in pain, but the doctors had no power to push forward tests that ultimately helped my condition. Also, I have never seen so many different doctors in such a short period of time in my life. Every single one of them started over from scratch; a huge waste of time since none of the records were digital. Every time I go, I have to plan on being there for a minimum of three hours which doesn't work so well if you're trying to have employment. I'm thankful things are better for me now and I appreciate the doctors, but the system within which they work is the quintessential example of inefficiency and waste. That should NOT be a part of Obamacare.
    • Perspective
      Thanks JK. I think while the operational and logistical challenges that hospital administrators face are really tough (putting it very lightly...), the point of your article is that Eskenazi Health is trying to lead in the midst of all of this healthcare system change. Eskenazi is trying to lead with a message that has been trying to punch through the traditional model of offering "sick care" instead of comprehensive wellness, and this is hugely bold as any marketing strategist would tell you. I think, or rather I hope, we are seeing the beginning of a long overdue philosophical change in the way we approach healthcare in the U.S. My guess is that it will work, because the market wants it, but IU Health and Ascension will concede by learning from Eskenazi's mistakes and getting in the pool with them.
    • clinics instead of hospital
      @dave -- as opposed to treating them in the hospital facility, where treatment would almost certainly be more expensive.
    • As opposed to the hospital
      I think your answer is in the first part of that sentence.
    • clinics vs hospital
      @Dave, I'm assuming they are choosing to treat patients at clinics as opposed to those patients returning to the emergency department for treatment. Clinics are much cheaper than ERs, thus saving tax dollars. It's a very smart move on Wishard's part.
    • Not Unique
      JKW - To your comment "continues to stand out because it is actually implementing a model that tries to promote patients’ health, rather than merely treat their diseases", Eskenazi-Wishard is not unique in these ventures and you point that out later. So the uniqueness of Eskanazi is that they have so much public support, not that they are striving to manage the health of patients. Reading your article makes other like-minded health care providers cringe at the misguided comments.
    • Be Careful What You Wish For
      JK, as you tout the success of Wishard, look closely at how they are funding their success. $155 million in special Medicaid payments due to a special relationship in place with nursing homes around the state. The Star did an article on it a while back. There are two points: (1) that only works as long as CMS keeps that strange progam in place, and (2) Wishard, being large, was able to implement this program in many rural communities, blocking out the local county hospitals from taking advantage of the program. This program is another example of government intervention gone wrong. Surely the spirit of the program was not for the Wishards of the world to run a nursing home in Logotee to divert funds back to build a new county hospital that has no relationship to those patients. The program should be limited to nursing homes within a reasonable service area of the hospital. If we had access to our fair share of those funds, we could put in such programs in our community as well.
    • Are you really THAT dumb??
      Reading comprehension, how does it work??

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

    2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

    3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

    4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

    5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

    ADVERTISEMENT