Get ready to see for-profit religious hospitals

July 17, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

I have to say it: the not-for-profit label worn by Indianapolis' hospitals is meaningless for just about everyone but the IRS.

Fact is, the executives leading those organizations are as profit-focused as any car dealer or street corner food vendor. If anything, they're coveting black ink more than ever.

That much was clear last month when St. Vincent Health, at the behest of its parent organization, St. Louis-based Ascension Health Alliance, laid off about 865 people.

St. Vincent’s cuts were just a small part of 4,700 jobs eliminated nationwide by Ascension, according to an executive who was laid off at St. Mary Medical Center, an Ascension subsidiary in Evansville.

Ascension, the nation’s largest chain of Catholic hospitals, wants to boost profits from its operations substantially. Any business would.

But Ascension faces extra pressure to focus on cutting costs, because both government health plans and private health insurers are holding the line on reimbursement rates. And Ascension, like all hospitals, needs to keep its profit margins healthy to satisfy its public bondholders.

Ascension’s hospital operations turned a profit of 3.7 percent in its most recently reported financial year, up from 2.7 percent the year before. That’s good but not great for a hospital system.

The 4,700 jobs eliminated represent just 4 percent of Ascension’s total work force of 122,000 people, but the cuts still could give a sizable boost to Ascension’s profit margin. A 4 percent cut to salaries and benefits would have saved Ascension about $325 million in its most recently reported fiscal year, which ended June 30, 2012. Its profit margin would have jumped up to 5.7 percent.

Profit-focused management is hardly unique to St. Vincent and Ascension. Indiana University Health, for example, tried to boost its profit margins over the past decade with aggressive building and marketing campaigns. It even, for a time, started new hospitals using for-profit structures and investment capital from physicians.

Some find this business-minded approach to medicine morally reprehensible. Hospitals, however, see themselves as using business practices to help them advance a worthwhile cause—human health. In this view, profits are not the purpose of the organization, but rather a necessary ingredient for sustaining that mission over the long-term.

“No margin, no mission” is the phrase often used by health care executives, particularly those leading religious, not-for-profit hospitals.

With exactly this mindset, Ascension launched in 2011 the Ascension Health Care Network as a for-profit joint venture with Oak Hill Capital Partners, a Wall Street private equity firm. The network’s goal is to use some of Oak Hill’s $30 billion asset chest to acquire struggling Catholic hospitals in order to keep them alive.

“Of course, the reason this issue is on the table at all is that there are Catholic hospitals across the country that are facing the question of whether they are going to be able to continue to survive, to thrive in the long run,” explained Leo Brideau, CEO of the Ascension Health Care Network. He noted that “in many cases we’re talking about whether they will even survive over the next five years or so.”

Brideau made those comments during a March 2012 conference at Seton Hall University in New Jersey. The proceedings of that conference were published this year as a book titled, “Is a For-Profit Structure a Viable Alternative for Catholic Health Care Ministry?” You can read the book here.

Ascension’s executives clearly think they can meld their Catholic mission and a for-profit status.

“The point is, ‘for-profit’ describes our tax status; it doesn’t describe our purpose. Our purpose is continuing the healing ministry of Jesus—that is our purpose,” Brideau said. “And so, whether not-for-profit or for-profit, we use our capital in very much the same ways; but in either case we have to provide a return on investment to our bondholders and to our shareholders.”

One thing Brideau did not address in his speech was whether a for-profit structure would affect the amount of free care provided. A 2006 analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, using data from Indiana and four other states, not-for-profit hospitals provide a tick more uncompensated care than their for-profit peers—4.7 percent of their operating expenses, compared with 4.2 percent at for-profit hospitals.

That said, I suspect we'll see other not-for-profit hospitals, perhaps even some here in Indianapolis, turn to a for-profit strategy to deal with financial pressures. Sensing exactly that kind of trend, the Catholic Health Association passed a rule in 2011 that allowed Catholic hospitals to keep their membership after converting to a for-profit organization, pending a study of the issue by a task force. And that's certainly what Ascension's Brideau expects.

“I believe that there is no question that for-profit tax status can be entirely consistent with maintaining the Catholic health ministry," he said. "In fact, I would argue that in today’s world it is necessary, beyond simply being appropriate.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • OK
    While the ACA is far from perfect, the result will be payment for most (or at least far more) of the charity care these entities provide. They will have to rationalize the care provided given the more realistic payment given. These hospitals have been working under this paradigm for a few years and still managed to turn respectable profits. They will now have to pay property taxes on what is usually desirable property, and taxes on profits earned.
  • really??
    Betrn'u, I believe you have a typo in your comment. It should read "they will have to 'ration' their care". ObamaCare is bad news. In order to receive the government payments, hospitals will have to play even more by government rules, which in turn means that government controls what healthcare is acceptable for whom and when. No. Thank. You. The ACA is nothing more than socialized medicine promoted by a marxist pseudo-President and a royalist Senate. While there are admittedly some drawbacks, the beauty of a for-profit system is that we, the people, can directly negotiate for ourselves. As for the tax issue, perhaps the only way for faith-based institutions to gain a true voice and began making meaningful change is for them to listen to the words of Jesus and "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's".
    • Non-Profit Tax Breaks
      The real question is why do non-profit hospitals that "act like" for-profit hospitals continue to enjoy massive tax breaks from our state government? What Mr. Brideau doesn't mention is that the non-profit tax status also comes with obligations to serve the community in exchange for lower tax bills. Its amazing that these large non-profit organizations continue to NOT pay taxes in exchange for a .5% increase in uncompensated care. If Indiana wants to raise revenues, start here!!
    • REALLY
      Is one of the "beauties" you like the negotiating you do directly with the hospital? I'm sure after you decode the charge list, you can argue the particulars of abdominal surgery with the best of'em. If you need help, I dabble in oncology as a hobby. But seriously, for only a 20% commission, the insurance companies will be happy to negotiate for you, and see if you "qualify".
    • Fundraising
      I find it incredibly ethically challenged the these hospitals throw million-dollar parties while claiming to raise money for charity care (Note the St. Vincent party at the FedEx terminal.) When they are putting marble floors in waiting areas they are not serving the health needs of the poor.
    • Bruce
      All Hospitals are for profit in the long run, or they are out of business. Some Hospitals (the "for-profits") pay real estate taxes and income taxes on their profits. Others (the not-for-profits) do not pay real estate taxes and income taxes on the profits.
    • old saw
      Not-for-profit is a tax status, not an operational strategy.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

    2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

    3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

    4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

    5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

    ADVERTISEMENT