Top 5 things I learned about health care this year

December 30, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Launching The Dose this year was a big change for me. I went from writing detached reportage about what the health care actors were doing to writing intentionally provocative analysis about the problems of health care and local players’ role in it.

The Dose is still a work in progress for me. Some have said I have a clear philosophy of health care that I promote via the blog. That was news to me, as I have tried to make The Dose an equal-opportunity venue for assessing blame in what is indisputably a dysfunctional system.

The Dose is also an ongoing learning experience for me. I’ve delved into topics that I never did before, I’ve received excellent criticism and comments from my readers, and I’ve identified major holes in my knowledge that I’m working to fill for 2014.

But before the New Year hits us, let me look back on the biggest lessons I learned 2013.

1. Hoosiers are spending way too much on health care. No matter how I looked at it, I found that Indiana is an expensive place to be when it comes to health care. Each Hoosier spends $780 more on health care, on average, than the average American, even though Hoosier incomes are 15 percent below the national average. There are four reasons why: 1) Hoosiers are less healthy than average Americans; 2) Hoosier health care providers charge higher prices and provide more services than their peers nationally; and 3) health insurance is rather uncompetitive in Indiana and the insurers have fought for larger discounts instead of actually holding down providers’ prices; and 4) Hoosier employers have consistently chosen broader access to providers instead of lower prices, taking away insurers’ bargaining power against providers.

2. The Affordable Care Act won’t make health care or insurance more affordable. I remember chuckling in mild disbelief when the president of a construction firm told me in March that he thought the Affordable Care Act was supposed to make health insurance more affordable for his workers (and his company). Anyone who had paid attention for 10 minutes to the health reform debate of 2009 knew that Obamacare was never designed to make things cheaper for those already insured or already providing insurance. In fact, the law taxes those two groups to help pay for coverage for the uninsured. A series of actuarial studies by Apex Benefits Group Inc. and Milliman Inc. concluded that Hoosier employers will pay, on average, 9 percent more for health insurance next year than they would have without Obama’s health law. For individuals, the math is more complicated, since Obamacare will extend tax credits to low- and modest-income buyers. But there is no doubt Obamacare is driving up the unsubsidized cost of insurance. The Indiana Department of Insurance estimated the increase at 72 percent. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield estimated it at 47 percent.

3. Consumer-driven health care is curbing health care costs, but it has a long, long way to go. Ten years after Congress blessed health savings accounts with tax free status, the percentage of Hoosiers in “consumer-directed health plans” rose to 34 percent. And health care pundits of all political stripes agree that high-deductible health insurance will become the dominant form of benefits under Obamacare. That trend is at least partly credited with restraining the rise in health care spending to just 4 percent per year recently. And it’s having visible consequences in the local marketplace too. I started the year with a story about major Indiana employers were embracing a new health care pricing tool called Castlight Health. Partly in response, the Indiana University Health hospital system cut prices on 38 imaging procedures by as much as 80 percent.  Other price services, such as Healthcare Blue Book and OKCopay Inc., are also getting use by employers and individual consumers. The Obama administration continues to release Medicare data on hospital prices and quality, which attracted lots of media attention, until everyone realized the data was mostly useless to consumers. Doctors are in the dark about prices too, which makes it hard for them to help patients make cost-benefit decisions about care. Patients still need more information before they can truly be health care consumers.

4. Obamacare stumbled out of the gate, but the health care industry is propping it up. The Obamacare exchanges have signed up 2 million Americans, compared with a predicted 3.3 million. The odds of enrollment meeting the Obama administration’s goal of 7 million is still unlikely. But that may matter less than people think. Companies like Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. are committed long-term to making the exchanges work, even though the company knows it will lose money next year in those marketplaces. In fact, the major health insurers were loyal soldiers in the face of a bevy of changes and deadline extensions made by the White House in November and December. Likewise, hospitals are ticked off that Obamacare’s promise of lots more paying patients isn’t panning out. But they are making do under the slower rise in reimbursements that has come from Obamacare’s changes to Medicare, as well as Congress’ sequestration. And IT entrepreneurs are flocking into the health care space with a raft of ideas on how to take care of more patients for less money. With the industry’s help, I predict, Obamacare will muddle through without the cataclysmic crash that its opponents are still hoping for.

5. Hospitals are inefficient, but they’re working hard to change. One of the biggest I learned this year came from a 40-year-old paper by health economist Joe Newhouse. In it, he described how providing more and more health care services is the reason d’etre of not-for-profit hospitals. It is why they don’t cut costs unless they absolutely have to. That helps explain why in central Indiana (where nearly all the hospitals are not-for-profit), there has been a proliferation of health care facilities, a steady rise in prices, and high utilization, too. But, to the hospitals’ credit, they are working hard to change. After the building boom of the last decade, there hasn’t been a new hospital facility announced in this area for years. Indiana University Health even shelved plan for an expensive new bed tower at its Methodist Hospital. All four of the major hospital systems in central Indiana laid off workers this year in a bid to cut about 20 percent out of their operating expenses. Franciscan St Francis Health boasted a 6 percent cut in expenses as part of its Medicare ACO project. The three other major hospital systems are all experimenting with the accountable care concept, too, which forces them to do what used to be heretical: reduce the number of people coming to the hospital. Perhaps this will yield the bend in the health care cost curve that policymakers have been seeking for years.

  • issues, my perspective
    Hello,this is just my opinion. It seems to me that while the politicians attempted to make certain they made themselves look good by making everyone have insurance (those that have pay for those that don't have) but they did nothing to curb the spiraling vortex of cost. Health providers get sued driving their costs up which is passed on to the consumer, since the consumers cost is up insurance must go up to cover and still profit. Since there seems to be no limit on awards in legal suits, insurance for the providers, regulatory fees (licenses) and so on the storm is self feeding with no end. It would have made more since to make regulatory caps what is given by the courts and charged by the providers along with getting everyone insured than to let the spiral continue for the profit of the few. Always thought health was a labor of caring similar to education and so for not maximizing profit. Thanks for letting me rant. Leonard
    • tax
      its just another tax.they are forcing it as they did with income tax and social.those are bankrupt.this is their fix to pay those two for twenty years.then will take over auto insurance to cover the 3 taxes
    • Cost Structure
      An explanation of the cost structure of the ACA, for those interested. Any feedback would be much appreciated. Good luck.
    • Medical Malpractice
      Leonard, Indiana was the first state to pass medical malpractice rearm in 1975. Indiana malpractice law caps damage payments to patients and limits amounts that physicians are responsible for. The Indiana law helps keep malpractice insurance rates low compare to other states without such laws Malpractice suits are not driving up health care costs in Indiana.
      • Half Right Alex
        Alex, you are right about the Indiana Med Mal issue, in part. What you left out is that the cost of care for those who are injured by doctors is now passed to Indiana's Medicaid plan, after the injury has bankrupted the patient's family, whose only fault was to get medical care that did not meet professional standards from the doctor who, with the insurer ought to pay for the mistake.
      • Spending Unnecessary Billions
        JK - Per your article, Indiana citizens spend $5.2 billion more, on average, than citizens in other states (6.7 million x $780). (Please check my math.)This is a staggering amount of money. that could go for many other family priorities. Clearly, we need to bring down health care costs.
        • Couple of Points
          JK - I applaud you on taking on the task of learning about the HealthCare industry. One of the glaring ommisions in your take on the industry is the cost associated with compliance to government regulations and the fact that doing those things that would reduce cost is prohibited by those same regulations. Also on the new construction, what about the new Wishard? (I'd try to spell Eskinazi but I know I'd get it wrong) or the new Major Hospital in Shelbyille? Rehab Hospital in Lafayette?
          • To JIm F.
            Sorry to be slow in responding over the holidays. Your math is correct. The data is from 2009 (which is the most recent available) so your population figure is a little high. But I figured Hoosiers spent $5 billion more in 2009 than they would have if their spending simply matched the U.S. average. SO, yes, costs are high. But that figure also includes utilization (which is a function of poor health and possibly over-aggressive treatment). So those are issues too.
          • To Major1
            Thanks for your feedback. I think you are right that I haven't focused on the impact of regulations on health care costs and on efforts to reduce them. I confess I don't know how those regulations operate, in enough detail, to talk about them intelligently. If you have any resources to suggest to get up to speed in that area, I would welcome them. As for hospital construction, neither the Wishard-Eskenazi project or the Major project is a NET addition to the number of hospitals in central Indiana. I also typically consider Lafayette as outside my definition of central Indiana, and I consider Lafayette as a separate hospital market from Indianapolis--although I could be persuaded otherwise.
          • IDOI
            I have a question regarding point number one. Twice to three times a year without delay, I am guaranteed to receive a letter saying that my rate is going up due to "the rising cost of goods and services" The Indiana Department of Insurance gets the final decision on whether insurance companies can raise your premium rates or not. Now, I am forced to take the next higher deductible to get my rate back down, but with the next increase my rate is back up and so is my deductible. What can be done where the Department of Insurance says NO, we will not authorize this increase, enough is enough.

          Post a comment to this blog

          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by
          1. The Walgreens did not get a lot of traffic. It was not located on the corner of the intersection, and not really visible from Emerson. Meanwhile the CVS there is huge and right on the corner. I am guessing a lot of people drove by a million times and never knew the Walgreens was there. Although, with the new Walmart market going in, that area could really see a lot of increase in traffic soon.

          2. You folks don't have a clue. There is a legal way to enter this country and to get aid. This left unchecked could run us to ruin quickly. I also heard that 'supporters' were getting major $$ to take them in? Who's monitoring this and guess who pays the bill? I support charitable organizations... but this is NOT the way to do it!

          3. Apparently at some time before alcohol has been served at the fair. The problem is that beer or wine used to be a common drink for people before soft drinks and was not thought to be that unusual. Since many folks now only drink to see how much they can drink or what kind of condition they can end up in it becomes more problematic. Go to Europe and its no big deal just as if you had sodas of milk to drink everyday. Its using common sense that is lacking now days.

          4. To address the epic failure of attracting race fans to both the Indy 500 and Brickyard 400 would take too much of my time to write. Bottom line Boles is clueless and obviously totally out of touch with the real paying fan base. I see nothing but death spin coming for the Brickyard, just like Indy. Get somebody in a place of power that understands what race fans want.

          5. I am a race fan through & through. It doesn't matter if it's Indy cars or Nascar. I love a great race. I go to several other tracks each year and you can see the entire track. I know Indy has tradition, but fans want to see the entire race. I sit in the Penthouse, am almost 60 years old, and would like to see a better TV screen in turn 1 so you can see the entire race. Then I think Indy needs to install an escalator so us old folks can make it up to the Penthouse and down again if we want more options to purchase food and drinks. Just a race fans opinion. Lights won't make the race any better, but you might be able to see the TV better at night. Turn 1's screen needs replaced with a better and bigger screen.