Can we, please, get a better name than 'accountable care'?

March 17, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health care has a branding problem right now.

I’m not talking about the individual health care businesses. (I mean, the fact that the former Clarian Health hospital system convinced Indiana University to let it use its name should go down in history as a great branding coup—at least for the hospital.)

What I mean is that the health care system is going through transformative change—but is doing so under some of the most sleep-inducing names possible.

If Shakespeare were assigned to write about health care in the 21st Century, he’d quip, “Could an ACO by any other name possibly be as dull?”

This became an issue a couple weeks ago when I told my editor that I had a scoop on Franciscan Alliance and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield forming Indiana’s first accountable care organization, or ACO, for commercially insured patients.

“The words ‘accountable care’ and ‘ACO’ make my eyes glaze over,” he said to me. “But I know this is supposed to be important, so go ahead and write about it.”

“Accountable care” has come to serve as an umbrella for various concepts in health care, all of which have soporific monikers.

Pay-for-performance, or P4P

Value-based purchasing

Shared savings

Bundled payments

Second curve

Some people try to use labels like “value-based care” or “population health” or “pay-for-value” as replacements for accountable care. But those names are almost equally vague or punchless or both.

This is too bad because, as I have explained here, this shift to accountable care is a positive change like we haven’t seen in health care in the past 50 years.

Think about it: As recently as five years ago, hospitals attacked new markets by building hugely expensive medical facilities, like those at Exit 10 in Fishers. But as accountable care or value-based care or whatever you want to call it spreads, it is rendering any hospital facility as cost center, which the hospitals will try to avoid sending patients to as often as they can.

Said another way, accountable care is forcing hospitals to get out of the hospital business—at least when we define hospitals as a place where sick patients spend the night to receive medical care.

So, because the dull names are masking the dramatic reality, I tried to come with a few alternatives that are punchier and more descriptive. Some of these are serious and some are tongue in cheek. Some are labels and some are taglines to marketing campaigns I could see hospitals and doctors running.

Hurry in! Aspirin now costs just $3.75 per pill.

Prices slashed! We’ll only charge you an arm this time.

Actually-paying-attention-to-cost care

Finally, doing no harm—to your wallet

No-more-bankruptcy care

Cost-sensitive care

Money-saving medicine

High quality, low cost care

Healthy bodies, healthy budgets

After reading my list, feel free to suggest a few of your own.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT