Can we, please, get a better name than 'accountable care'?

March 17, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health care has a branding problem right now.

I’m not talking about the individual health care businesses. (I mean, the fact that the former Clarian Health hospital system convinced Indiana University to let it use its name should go down in history as a great branding coup—at least for the hospital.)

What I mean is that the health care system is going through transformative change—but is doing so under some of the most sleep-inducing names possible.

If Shakespeare were assigned to write about health care in the 21st Century, he’d quip, “Could an ACO by any other name possibly be as dull?”

This became an issue a couple weeks ago when I told my editor that I had a scoop on Franciscan Alliance and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield forming Indiana’s first accountable care organization, or ACO, for commercially insured patients.

“The words ‘accountable care’ and ‘ACO’ make my eyes glaze over,” he said to me. “But I know this is supposed to be important, so go ahead and write about it.”

“Accountable care” has come to serve as an umbrella for various concepts in health care, all of which have soporific monikers.

Pay-for-performance, or P4P

Value-based purchasing

Shared savings

Bundled payments

Second curve

Some people try to use labels like “value-based care” or “population health” or “pay-for-value” as replacements for accountable care. But those names are almost equally vague or punchless or both.

This is too bad because, as I have explained here, this shift to accountable care is a positive change like we haven’t seen in health care in the past 50 years.

Think about it: As recently as five years ago, hospitals attacked new markets by building hugely expensive medical facilities, like those at Exit 10 in Fishers. But as accountable care or value-based care or whatever you want to call it spreads, it is rendering any hospital facility as cost center, which the hospitals will try to avoid sending patients to as often as they can.

Said another way, accountable care is forcing hospitals to get out of the hospital business—at least when we define hospitals as a place where sick patients spend the night to receive medical care.

So, because the dull names are masking the dramatic reality, I tried to come with a few alternatives that are punchier and more descriptive. Some of these are serious and some are tongue in cheek. Some are labels and some are taglines to marketing campaigns I could see hospitals and doctors running.

Hurry in! Aspirin now costs just $3.75 per pill.

Prices slashed! We’ll only charge you an arm this time.

Actually-paying-attention-to-cost care

Finally, doing no harm—to your wallet

No-more-bankruptcy care

Cost-sensitive care

Money-saving medicine

High quality, low cost care

Healthy bodies, healthy budgets

After reading my list, feel free to suggest a few of your own.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Choice between a democrat and a question mark? Take the question mark. We have all seen what the democrats will do.

  2. Its easy to blame workers. What about the Management of the Mill. Its not smart in business to not have a back up plan. Workers are afforded sick days in most cases. Union or not. Whether drunk partying, or a real sickness. Why would you as a businessman/woman not have a rotation of workers incase this happens. This is not an exclusive union protection. If the company can prove bad intentions on the part of any union employee. They can take action. Most CBA's have a 3 strike policy. Just like most Non-union company policies. You should read a CBA sometime. There are protections for companies too. Unions understand that businesses need to make money. If they don't, the union's member won't have a place to work.

  3. My kids play hockey on the North side and we have been very happy with the youth program. More Ice would create more opportunity for kids to pay this great sport. With 3 rinks that would also create more figure skating opportunities. What better gift to give your kids than a sport they will love!

  4. Naah, only Indy place fans were robbed of seeing Zanardi race. CART fans saw his amazing talents just about every weekend. And F1 fans saw him too. Zanardi didn't care he wasn't at Indy, neither do 99.18% of other race fans world wide. And CART fans are quite pleased of the domination of their drivers and owners have had at Indy, in the IRL, and in the current Indycar series....almost 99.18% of the time since 2000 Indy 500. I respect Zanardi, but his life goes on without Indy. Sucks to be you Capt.

  5. So let me get this right: gun permits online are fraud proof, but voting is as easy as 1-2-3.--But at least we agree that someone without a photo ID cannot be trusted with a gun.

ADVERTISEMENT