Marathon talks yield good deal for hospitals in Pence's HIP expansion

May 15, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Leaders from the Indiana Hospital Association showed up at the Statehouse on May 9 at 7:30 a.m. to hash out the terms of the key funding mechanism for Gov. Mike Pence’s health insurance expansion.

Not until 10:30 that night did hospital association president Doug Leonard and Pence’s budget director, Chris Atkins, sign on the dotted line.

That marathon session, which involved Pence health care advisers Brian Neale and Seema Verma, appears to have generated a deal that both sides like.

Contributions from hospitals will make up more than two-thirds of the funding needed to expand the Healthy Indiana Plan by 2020. The program is projected to bring in revenue of $459 million that year, and $1.6 billion over the next six years.

When Pence unveiled his plans to expand the HIP program on Thursday, he boasted that he’s expanding health coverage with no new taxes--although, technically, Pence is taxing hospitals to pay for this. Still, by avoiding taxes on common citizens, it gives Pence a claim that could help him in a 2016 presidential run.

Yet hospitals as a whole will receive more benefits than they’ll incur in costs under Pence’s HIP 2.0 plan.

“Is this overall, the totality of this, is this still a good deal? Yeah,” said Brian Tabor, a lobbyist for the Indiana Hospital Association who led the hospitals' negotiations with the state. He added, however, that there is still work to be done to make sure the expansion doesn’t hurt some hospitals or that, if it does, adjustments are made to help those hospitals. “Are there probably some issues that need to be looked at down the road? Yeah.”

By 2020, benefits for hospitals will include:

-    An estimated 350,000 customers covered by the Healthy Indiana Plan, which will pay the same prices as Medicare pays now, according to a projection by Milliman Inc., the actuarial firm hired by the state government.
-    An extra 89,000 new customers covered by state contributions toward employer-sponsored insurance, which pays doctors and hospitals at a significant profit, according to Milliman’s projections. There may some some countervailing reduction, however, in the numbers of low-income Hoosiers enrolled in private health insurance, as some of them move over to the HIP program.
-    A 25 percent increase in reimbursement rates for the patients that remain covered by the poor-paying Medicaid program.

And what will hospitals have to contribute?

Nothing in the first two years of the expansion. Then in 2017, they’ll pay assessment that are 15 percent to 20 percent higher than they're paying now.

Those assessments are used by the state to increase its Medicaid payments to hospitals, which triggers additional federal funding at a roughly 2-for-1 rate.

So every additional dollar hospitals chip in brings them and the state $2 in additional federal money.

That funding mechanism, known as the hospital assessment fee, is currently generating nearly $800 million in additional payments to hospitals to help offset the losses they incur on Medicaid patients.

The HIP 2.0 will bring down even more money: $125 million in 2017, ramping up to $346 million in 2020.

Those funds, combined with about $112 million per year in cigarette tax revenue, is how Pence will fund the state’s portion of the health insurance expansion.

The rest of the money will come from the federal government as part of Obamacare—the law Pence still wants repealed. But if the Obama administration accepts Pence’s HIP 2.0 plan, Obamacare plan will bring Indiana $17 billion in additional federal funds over the next decade.

No wonder Indiana’s hospital executives had a spring in their step this week.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Failed to address
    What this article fails to address is the the increase in demand for services from a population of people that have not had insurance. While it's true that hospitals will now be paid for this expansion of insurance coverage, the reimbursement is less than their costs and that could still negatively effect the bottom line for hospitals.
  • Disengenious and Dishonest Plan
    JK - This sounds like a marathon pricing conference. It sounds like a Ponzi scheme to indirectly extract money from the Federal government without having to call it "expanded Medicaid." Otherwise, how can the hospitals absorb costs and still increase revenues over and above the additional costs? I did not read a single word about the overall breadth and quality of coverage under this plan nor did I read anything about deductibles or co-pays that I believe are associated with the proposed plan. I find the whole Pence effort disingenuous and disgusting! He plays politics while thousands of uninsured continue to go without health care. You owe your readers a better accounting for who is really paying for this plan.
    • To Jim F.
      The financing mechanism is legit, it just sounds weird because it's a wrinkle of the complexities in Medicare and Medicaid financing. To understand it better, read this article: http://www.ibj.com/hospitals-might-chip-in-to-expand-medicaid/PARAMS/article/47005. As for the benefits in these programs, our coverage has not detailed those features. But the Pence folks have put out details on it. Read under the "How Does HIP 2.0 Work?" heading at this link: http://www.in.gov/fssa/hip/2445.htm.
    • Gov Pence Announcement
      Here's an article on Gov. Pence's announcement about healthcare expansion in Indiana.
    • Gov Pence Announcement
      Here's an article about Gov. Pence's announcement on Healthcare expansion in Indiana.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

    2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

    3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

    4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

    5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

    ADVERTISEMENT