Should IU Health pursue a strategy of mediocrity?

July 31, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Corrections: IU Health Plans offers access primarily to doctors that are part of the IU Health system and not to doctors that are part of competing hospital systems. However, IU Health Plans does include independent doctors, especially in primary care. Also, the risk adjustment mechanism Obamacare created for the individual and small employer markets is a permanent feature of the law. This post originally stated that risk adjustment in the Obamacare exchanges would end after 2016. I'm sorry for those errors. I have corrected them below. -- J.K. Wall

Last month, when U.S. News & World Report released its annual Best Hospitals rankings, Indiana University Health had fallen off the magazine’s honor roll of the nation’s top 1 percent of hospitals.

I’m sure the folks at IU Health weren’t thrilled about it, after being on the prominent list the previous two years.

But, in a way, perhaps they should be celebrating.

Let me explain why:

Obamacare and other factors are pushing hospitals away from their usual ways of making money—seeing lots of patients and performing lots of tests and procedures. That trend is great for health insurers like WellPoint Inc., which make money whenever they charge more in premiums than the cost of care their customers use.

So IU Health and other hospitals are ramping up their own health insurance plans to capture more of those profits that have been going to WellPoint. These plans include primarily IU Health doctors, so whoever signs up for IU Health insurance is likely to be an IU Health patient.

IU Health's top-notch reputation will continue to attract lots of healthy people into its orb, and that should hold true for its insurance plans. The problem is, IU Health's stellar reputation also could bring its insurance plans an overabundance of really sick patients. And that could cause IU Health's insurance plans to spend more money caring for those patients than they can offset by selling insurance to those who don't use it much.

Put another way, if IU Health persuades all the folks with cancer, clogged arteries and really sick children to join its insurance plans, it might end up losing its shirt.

And that would be a problem, because IU Health is, to some extent, counting on insurance profits to offset the loss in patient volume it has suffered recently. It expects those lower volumes to continue as pressures from Obamacare, employers and patients themselves push it to do fewer high-dollar surgeries and hospitalizations.

“We know that the most affordable care a member can receive is the care that was made unnecessary through effective approaches that improve health,” Jim Parker, the CEO of IU Health’s insurance plans, wrote to me in May.

IU Health Plans sells individual Medicare Advantage policies to seniors. Those privately run plans now account for three out of every 10 Medicare beneficiaries. And that percentage is  and growing.

In 2015, IU Health Plans will offer individual insurance policies to Hoosiers of all ages, both on and off the Obamacare exchanges.

In addition, IU is the half-owner of MDwise Inc., which signed up nearly 28,000 insurance customers on the Obamacare exchanges this year.

And IU Health Plans also will try to sell on the private exchanges that many employers are looking to offer in place of their typical group plans.

Why are these markets—which all hinge on individual choices—so dangerous for hospital-run insurance plans?

Well, when hospitals offer health benefits to employer groups—even ones with, say, just 10 employees—they can be fairly certain that not all 10 of those people have cancer, or have a child needing services at IU Health’s Riley Hospital for Children, or folks who are on a waiting list for an organ transplant.

But when consumers are choosing plans one by one, IU Health can have no such confidence. It has a great brand, so it might attract lots of customers. But if it attracts all the customers who are already receiving lots of medical care—while the healthy folks opt instead for the broader choice of hospitals and doctors offered by Anthem or UnitedHealthcare—its cost of care could outstrip the premiums it charged.

Or, if IU Health tries to head off this problem by offering health plans with high premiums, it won’t get many customers at all.

Under Obamacare, the risks of this kind of “adverse selection” will be mitigated in the individual and small employer markets by risk-adjustment formulas that will shift premiums from health plans that sign up a preponderance of healthy customers to those that sign up mostly sick customers. But some risk will remain.

In all the individual markets, Parker is trying to attract customers who want long-term relationships with IU Health doctors to manage their health.

“Although the markets operate differently in many respects, they share one thing in common: Those that partner with individuals to manage their health effectively will succeed,” Parker wrote.

He’s right, but in the meantime, IU Health’s marketing department might lend Parker a hand by not mentioning that U.S. News ranked its downtown hospitals among the best nationally in four adult specialties and nine pediatric specialties. Or that the IU Health medical center downtown ranked tops in Indiana in 13 out of 15 specialties.

(Other hospitals, even those not offering health insurance plans, might want to stop touting themselves as having the best heart care in the nation—since, under Obamacare, cutting down on the number of expensive surgeries will be important for their future financial success.)

IU Health could instead run advertisements touting the medical specialties in which it "Doesn't Have The Strength It Takes."

Or IU Health could send checks to Community Health Network to keep promoting its cancer partnership with MD Anderson and to St. Vincent Health to promote its Peyton Manning Children’s Hospital and organ transplant center. That would be a way to direct more of those patients to other hospital systems and, therefore, to sign up for other health insurance plans.

Or, more seriously, IU Health might encourage employers that adopt private exchanges to also hire a firm to do risk-adjusting, so that its plans don’t become uncompetitive—even if they’re doing a better job taking care of sick patients.

It’s another example of how the incentives in health care have turned upside down under Obamacare and other health reform efforts. How IU Health and other hospitals respond is still very much up in the air.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Just Wow
    "Put another way, if IU Health persuades all the folks with cancer, clogged arteries and really sick children to join its insurance plans, it might end up losing its shirt." Wow, this statement says it all with this article. God forbid those people be seen as anything more than money losing ventures. You know, that poor 3 year old child with cancer that needs treatment. No, no, Mr. Wall, that child is nothing but a money losing venture. IU Health should not even consider his / her care unless there is a way they can make a nice profit off him / her. Amazing people like you are out there. You sure know your business but you are missing out on the empathy chip. Money, money, money. Amazing what it will cause people to say and do...
    • Risk Adjustment
      Risk adjustment is a permanent part of the changes to the ACA’s individual and small group markets (please see http://actuary.org/files/ACA_Risk_Share_Fact_Sheet_FINAL120413.pdf for more information). The risk corridors and transitional reinsurance fee sunset after 2016.
      • To Wow
        I am certain IU Health does not view really sick patients merely as money-losing ventures. But from a mathematical standpoint, that is what they are. So when IU Health becomes an insurer, it has to find a way to attract a mix of both healthy and sick patients. That doesn't mean it is being heartless to the sick patients. It means it's trying to find a way to subsidize the cost of their care so that either the sick patient or IU Health itself doesn't go bankrupt. I view that as prudent, not merely profit seeking.
        • To Reader
          Thank you for flagging this error in my post. I have corrected it above.
        • Heartless?
          Mr Wall: I don't think anyone is saying IU is heartless. It's YOU who are being heartless in framing the discussion in such a crass manner. S an insurer , IU will attract all sorts of people, both sick and healthy, because they include the best medical facilities in the state. Parents of both sick and healthy children will choose IU because IF their children would need hospitalization, they would them to go to the children's hospital that didn't need to pay an NFL player to use his name in order to attract patients!

          Post a comment to this blog

          COMMENTS POLICY
          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
           
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
           
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
           
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
           
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
           

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by
          ADVERTISEMENT
          1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

          2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

          3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

          4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

          5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

          ADVERTISEMENT