If Bird retires, is it Miller time?

April 9, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s strange to be talking about replacing Larry Bird as head of Indiana Pacers basketball operations when he’s having his best year in that position.

There are more than a few NBA analysts who have pegged Bird as the 2012 NBA executive of the year. For the last few years Bird preached patience while promising he’d deliver this city a winning NBA basketball team. Now, he’s fulfilling that promise as the 34-22 Pacers ready for a serious playoff run.

But Bird’s year-to-year handshake deal with Pacers owner Herb Simon leaves his long-term future in limbo. Bird himself has done little to dissuade speculation, saying only that he’ll evaluate his situation at season’s end.

Simon and Pacers President Jim Morris have given Bird unwavering support since the day he replaced Donnie Walsh. But Bird has a bad back and a littany of other nagging aches and pains from his playing days, and sources close to him say he's tired of the 24-7 grind required of NBA basketball operations executives.

Oddly, Bird has never been as popular with Pacers fans as he has been with Simon and Morris. Bird certainly isn’t as popular with fans as Pacers basketball operations boss as he was as the Pacers’ coach and even as a player for the rival Boston Celtics.

That could all change with a victory in the first round of the Eastern Conference playoffs this year. Bird’s popularity would surely swell if somehow the Pacers could mount a challenge to either the Miami Heat or Chicago Bulls in the East.

Despite the Pacers’ success this year, Reggie Miller’s acceptance into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame has intensified speculation about Bird’s future and the position he holds.

There are more than a few fans who would like to see Miller join the Pacers front office. Last week’s Hall of Fame announcement ignited that discussion among local sports radio talk show hosts, TV sportscasts and on Pacers’ Internet message boards.

Simon and Morris wouldn’t object to Miller stepping into the front office. But if Bird wants to stay—and some say he still has unfinished business—don’t expect Simon and Morris to push him aside for Miller.

It’s unlikely there would be enough room in the Pacers front office for Bird and Miller to coexist. Bird and Miller have no problem with one another, but the two together would simply mean one too many stars and big egos in the war room.

But if Bird decides to fly away to his beach home permanently, that may provide Simon and Morris with an interesting quandary.

If Miller wants the job of replacing Bird, he has some undeniable positives. First, Pacers fans absolutely adore Miller. His personality makes him a better front man for the team than Bird. He may actually be popular enough with the fans that he could be one of the few NBA executives to help boost attendance.

Yes, attendance is about winning. But the Pacers are winning and remain 29th out of 30 NBA teams in attendance. Something is missing, and that something may be a connection between the team and this community. Miller might be the perfect person to rekindle the connection the team had with locals during Miller’s playing days.

It’s true that Miller has no front office experience. There are two schools of thought on that.

The first school says Miller needs to come up through the front office ranks before he takes over such an important position. Bird trained under Walsh, though that arrangement became awkward just before Walsh departed for New York.

The second school of thought says Miller played 18 years in the NBA and understands well the inner workings of a professional team. He’s stayed involved in the league as a television commentator since his retirement in 2005. Some have argued that if you surround him with capable executives like David Morway, who is currently Bird’s chief lieutenant, Miller would do just fine.

A lot of dominos would have to fall in the right direction for Miller to succeed Bird. The first is Bird’s retirement. And although no one is pushing him out the door, many believe he could decide to leave of his own accord after this season.

If Bird does pull the plug on his hoops career, it will leave Pacers fans hoping No. 31 can rekindle the old magic in a new role.

And it will no doubt leave Simon and Morris asking, “Is it Miller time?”

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bird/Miller
    Nothing to see here. Move along.
  • Miller
    Interesting thoughts here. The 1st question would be whether Reggie wants to do it. His current roles with the NBA and some NCAA tournament commentating is really effortless for him. If he is up for the challenge then I for one would love to see him. My problem with Bird is that he is and always will be a Celtic. I will never forget the feeling seeing Bird, a Pacers executive, openly celebrate the Celtics winning the 2008 championship.
  • Not Miller - yet
    IF Larry Bird decides to retire, David Morway has to be on the very short list of people to be considered as Larry's replacement. He has the front office experience and there is nothing to suggest that you have to have been an NBA player to be the best person suited for that role.

    Although he will forever be revered as a Pacer player, you don't have to look any further than the NBA itself to see an example of the fact that great players do not always make great executives.

    Michael Jordan should be firing himself for the horrible job he is alleging to have done with the Bobcats. Before that, he was fired by the Wizards.

    Reggie might grow into that role, given his experience in staying close to the league, but being a broadcaster doesn't teach you the lessons needed for managing cap space, expiring contracts and building a team in a way that is not always popular, but effective.

    I, for one, have been excited about the job Bird has done. He has done EXACTLY what he said he would do. He rebuilt the roster, got rid of the thugs (i.e. Tinsley, Jackson, et al) and those past their prime (Jermaine O'Neal). He told everyone who would listen that the team would struggle during the interim but that he was building a nucleus for the future.

    It is NOW becoming the fans turn to begin supporting a winning team and there's no reason that the #3 seed in the East should be almost last in attendance.

    Someone else - assuming he would have the interest but maybe not the time -- is Clark Kellogg. He continues to do an awesome job in the behind the scenes role as the Director of Player Relations. As a mentor and someone who's been around for a long time, he would make an excellent choice.

    And, for what it's worth, Bird should not apologize for what he did with the Celtics and I am sure he would openly celebrate just as much when the time comes for the Pacers to capture a championship.
  • Walsh/Morway
    I represent the very competent David Morway, as well as Donnie Walsh ( in addition Mark Jackson and am friendly with Reggie.) Little confused how Donnie is not part of this story, but perhaps you wrote before news of Donnie being available broke late last week. If Larry were to leave a brain trust of Donnie, David and Reggie could work IMO. You can reach me, if you desire at Steve@Kauffmansports.com. Very good piece.
  • Donnie
    Bringing Donnie back could be interesting. Not sure that would be the very best thing, but maybe to get Reggie up and running it could work. I wonder if Donnie would want to get back in the grind again like he was for the Pacers a few years back.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT