RGIII not playing No. 2 to Luck in sponsor deals, fan appeal

June 8, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s impossible at this point to say which of the first two picks in this year’s NFL draft will wind up being the best quarterback.

But right now, No. 2 pick Robert Griffin III appears to be a hotter commodity with sponsors, fans and sports card traders than No. 1 pick Andrew Luck.

Griffin already has signed major sponsorship deals with Adidas, Subway sandwich shops, EA Sports, Castrol Motor Oil and football safety gear maker EvoShield.

Luck meanwhile, has signed deals with Nike and Pepsi, for which he’ll do ads for Gatorade and Quaker Oats.

So far, Luck has been focused on graduating from Stanford, which he finally did this week, and learning the Indianapolis Colts playbook. He’s on record as saying he wants to “earn” accolades and sponsorship deals with his play rather than just for being the No. 1 pick.

Luck’s handlers at Wasserman Media Group have promised that things will pick up for Luck post-graduation and as the season nears. Not only is Luck likely to pick up additional sponsors, he’s also likely to partner with a not-for-profit cause or two as the season approaches, Wasserman officials said.

Local sports marketer David Morton doesn’t think Griffin’s early lead in sponsorship deals is an indication that he’s more marketable than Luck.

“They’re two different athletes in two different markets,” said Morton, president of Sunrise Sports Group.

While Morton said there’s some advantage to getting sponsorship deals done before the NFL season and making announcements before the media shifts its attention to the Summer Olympics, he doesn’t think Luck is more poorly positioned than Griffin at this point.

“Andrew Luck is going to get a lot of requests and a lot of offers this year,” Morton said. “He needs to be selective and learn to say ‘no.’ A lot of athletes have worn out their welcome by becoming a pitchman just because they’re a high draft choice. [Luck] needs to be very strategic, deliberate and cautious in his approach, and I think that’s what you’re seeing.”

But there’s no doubt there’s intrigue in Griffin, the 2011 Heisman Trophy winner and Washington Redskins selection. His unique skills and personality seem to have captured the attention of football fans nationwide.

In a new release of 2012 Bowman Football Cards this week, Griffin’s cards were snatched up at higher prices than Luck’s.

The highest price fetched by any card in the opening hours of the sale was an autographed limited edition of Griffin’s card that went for $1,000. The second-highest-priced card at $650 was a dual autographed card featuring Griffin and Luck.

The top price paid for a limited edition Luck autographed card was $540, with most of his cards going in the $250 range.

Of course, none of this has anything to do with how the two will do on the field this season. And that will likely be the biggest determining factor in who is the most popular among fans and the most coveted among sponsors in the long haul.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Please
    What a misleading headline. Looking at the substance of this story, it should not have even been written.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT