Despite playoff, college football title still tarnished

June 27, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

All hail. The college football powers that run the Bowl Championship Series have come up with a four-team playoff.

This will bring cash hundreds of millions of dollars deep to college football and the power conferences that control the enterprise.

Yes, this is big business. BCS officials are already negotiating a TV deal for the three-game playoff worth a reported $500 million annually.

What the playoff system, which is to begin during the 2014-15 season, won’t do is end the controversy surrounding the college football national champion. That’s because the main problem with college football has still not been addressed. The selection process that determines the teams in the playoff still stinks.

A selection committee will determine the playoff participants, with weight placed on record, strength of schedule, head-to-head results and whether a team is a conference champion.

The composition of the selection committee, the name of the new system and how revenue from the playoffs will be distributed hasn’t been disclosed.

There’s a shocker. Leave it to college football powers to leave out a couple of important details. The selection process should have been one of the first things revealed since it is, has been, and always will be the primary source of controversy in college football and the tarnish on its national championship crown.

All this playoff system does is shift the controversy from focusing on the No. 2- and 3-ranked teams to the No. 4- and 5-ranked teams. And that controversy will be magnified—I predict within three years—when the No. 4-ranked team defeats the No. 1-ranked team in the playoffs. Parity in football is spreading from the NFL to the college ranks, so it’s only a matter of time.

How many teams, including the No. 5- and 6-ranked teams and on and on will claim they too could have competed with or even defeated the team deemed No. 1 by the ultra-wacky BCS ratings system?

Controversy in college football national championships has existed since the first kick-off decades ago. With the press voting one way and the coaches voting another, split national champions and controversy over who is really No. 1 is nothing new.

So the BCS—instituted in 1998—was supposed to solve all that by pitting No. 1 and No. 2 in a single bowl game. Wow, what a great idea. Then here comes Boise State and Utah with their undefeated seasons and a cavalcade of other teams that maybe lost a single early season game claiming that by season’s end they were truly playing the best football in the land.

College basketball has largely dodged the kind of bullets that riddled college football’s reputation. Sure, a few seedings and NCAA basketball tournament exclusions have raised some eyebrows, but the chorus of boos hasn’t risen to nearly the level of howls over college football rankings.

The reason why is simple. The teams that arguably should have made the hoops tournament, but didn’t, probably wouldn’t have escaped the first two rounds, anyway, much less win a national title. So while there’s a whimper of complaints by the likes of ESPN’s Dick Vitale and Jay Bilas, there’s no hue and cry about the selection process.

Football, though, is an entirely different story. There’s no methodical, objective selection process, and football schedules are simply too short to have fair strength of schedule comparisons.

What’s the answer? A more transparent, systematic and logical selection process for starters—one not controlled primarily by the power conferences and their commercial interests.

What else? Radical change. It’s not easy, or necessarily pleasant, but if college football is going to rid itself of its own stench once and for all, it’s necessary.

If college football truly wants to take all the tarnish off its national championship crown, it’s going to have to scrap the bowl system and construct a playoff that includes all the contenders. And even a few pretenders.

  • Good thing about this? Gives Indy another major sporting event to vie for. Worst thing NCAA could do? Give Indy the championship in the first year. We will so knock it out of the park, no one else will be able to come close. I can hear the other city's "Damn it Indy has raised the bar again." I feel bad for NOLA. Having to host a Superbowl after us?
  • True Playoff is coming
    You are correct that there will be controversy every year about the four teams in the playoff and the others that were snubbed. However, this is much better than the current system. It was not too long ago that March Madness only had 32 teams. The powers to be will find a way to develop a post season that is similar to division 1-AA and allow the "pretenders" to still play in bowls so that maximum revenue can be generated. This 4 team playoff is a step in the right direction.
  • NOLA isn't in a panic
    Indyman, I don't think NOLA is too worried about following up to Indy. This isn't their first They generally get very high praise for their job in hosting big, major sporting events. There is tons to do in the downtown area that is close to the Superdome and hotels are mostly located downtown as well. Not much different from Indy. Plus, I heard Mercedes is throwing tons of money into the pot for next years Superbowl. That is a good idea seeing how their name is on the outside of the stadium.
  • 16 teams
    For this to be a fair process, they have to go to 16 teams. The era of undefeated teams is about to come to a close and the need to clean up this selection process is paramount.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............