Bird, Simon responses raise questions about Pacers ownership

June 28, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As I watched Wednesday’s Indiana Pacers press conference, I couldn’t help but think how much has changed in four years.

The biggest change is that the Pacers are a much better team, one that last year began to gain the adoration of Indianapolis hoops fans once again. But there are other more subtle, but no less important changes pertaining to the team’s long-term future.

When I asked Pacers owner Herb Simon four years ago about future ownership of the team, he was adamant about one thing: The Simon family would maintain ownership is some way, shape or form.

On Wednesday as the Pacers announced Larry Bird would step down as president of basketball operations and Donnie Walsh and Kevin Pritchard would fill his shoes, Simon seemed much less adamant on that point. I was taken by the apparent change in heart.

I should state that I’ve been told by Pacers officials that the team is absolutely not for sale and Simon will continue at the helm for the foreseeable future. But it appeared from Wednesday’s press conference that the idea of the Pacers sailing on without Herb Simon has finally crept into his mind. And the possibility also arose that there may be no one in the Simon family waiting in the wings to take over this money-losing operation. Simon has never been willing to address this point.

When asked Wednesday if Larry Bird could ever own the team, Simon responded, “We’ll keep an open mind.”

When I asked the same question four years ago, Simon almost went through the roof, emphasizing that the franchise would stay in the family. Perhaps he was just being diplomatic in front of a room full of reporters Wednesday.

Bird was asked if it is a goal of his to own the team.

“Not anymore,” he responded. “It used to be. I had a group at one time, I thought maybe if they decide to sell … I have other people interested in buying the team.”

It seemed pretty clear Bird and Simon had discussed the team’s ownership status. Then Bird dropped what to me seemed like a mini-bombshell. Is Bird in touch with a group that wants to buy the Pacers? It sure sounded like that.

“I think the goal here, it don’t matter who owns the team, it’s got to stay here in Indianapolis,” Bird said. “That’s been Herbie’s life-long dream, and that would be mine.”

Simon said nothing. But he nodded affirmatively. Four years ago, I suspect he would have reiterated that the Simon family would continue to own the team. Wednesday, there was no such affirmation.

Some things—happily for Pacers fans—have not changed. So while the Simon ownership into the infinite future may now be in question, it appears the team’s long-term status as Indy’s team is not.

Four years ago, I asked him,“Do you envision any scenario under which the Pacers would relocate to another market?”

“Well, there is no thought, plan or concept at this time that would provide for that,” he answered. “I feel, within whatever power I have, that the reason I've really taken back my involvement in this team is because I want to keep it in the city, and it was going in the direction where it was almost impossible to have it here. So I’m here in this room to make sure that this team becomes viable so that we can stay in this city forever. That’s my task. That’s my challenge, and that’s what I’m here to do.”

ADVERTISEMENT
  • More Crap????
    Before I waste my time reading this, can someone let me know if this is a carefully researched column or if it just more speculative crap that he wrote the other day. TIA and I'm anticipating it's the latter
  • More crap. I am not sure what has gotten into Anthony, but he seems to be swinging for the fences. Problem is you strike out much more than you get on base doing that. I understand that if one of his speculations comes true, he has bragging rights for a lifetime, and even if he never makes contact with the ball, people usually respond to wild statements, but this is just beneath the IBJ and Anthony. Here is how you read what was said and not said at the news conference. Will Herb Simon own the team forever....no, unless he has found a fountain of youth, he will die someday like the rest of us. Will the Simon Family own the team forever. Probably not forever, but it may pass on to the next generation. Of course Congress has done its best with death taxes to make it difficult for children to inherit teams. But the best we heard is that Herb wants to keep it in Indy. That is what we all want. Besides the fact, there are not many markets that could support an NBA team right now.
  • CITIZEN OWNERSHIP
    I have always felt that for the monopolies the professional teams have, since they are granted by the government, the citizens should be offered the right to ownership, like they have in Green Bay. That way owners quit holding the tax payers hostage, like the Seattle team did in its move to Oklahoma City. Not right. Its OUR TEAM.
  • It's a legitimate question
    IndyMan, get over yourself. The question of future ownership of this team is a completely legitimate one. If you know anything about Herb's children, you know wondering about the next generation of Simon who will run this team, which operates in a city-owned venue, is completely legit. I'm only amazed that no one else picked up on this aspect of yesterday's press conference before now.
  • Anthony's right
    Herb's openness to the ownership question and Bird's revelation that he was involved with a group that wanted to buy the team were the real stories of the press conference. Worth following up on.
  • Hit a nerve!
    Wow, I bet this post really hit a nerve with Herb Simon and his staff. I definitely think there were some strange statements by Herb and Larry at the press conference. Stay after this one IBJ. The Star certainly won't follow up. They're too busy getting their spoon fed tips.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT