Decline of Brickyard 400 shows power of Indy 500

July 30, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

After chatting with resident IBJ graphics guru Dave Vrabel this morning, I realized the Brickyard 400’s declining attendance demonstrates the strength of the franchise that is the Indianapolis 500.

Vrabel is an avid motorsports fan—the kind who doesn’t hesitate to drive a few hundred miles to a race, and he often helps me better understand the undercurrents of the sport. This morning, he brought something up, that while it seemed obvious after he mentioned it, I had not considered.

While the Brickyard 400 NASCAR race has seen its rise and fall within a relatively short 19-year history, the Indianapolis 500 has persevered through good times and bad, through peace time and World Wars and through massive popularity swings in open-wheel racing.

Even when CART vacated, leaving 33 drivers most people couldn’t pick out of a line-up, the Indianapolis 500 drew more than 300,000 fans. Even as the IndyCar Series struggles today to find its re-unified legs, the Greatest Spectacle in Racing continues to pack ‘em in.

Is it a complete sellout like it was in the 1970s and 1980s? No. But it still counts itself as the nation’s largest live sporting event. It’s massively popular with locals and a good deal of out-of-towners. Safe to say, it’s still hugely profitable.

As Vrabel pointed out to me, it’s a weird situation regarding the Indianapolis 500 and Brickyard 400. In its inaugural year in 1994, the Brickyard 400 drew a crowd comparable to that year’s Indianapolis 500.

Now, NASCAR would kill for the Brickyard 400 to achieve the kind of attendance and TV ratings that the Indy 500 has long produced. But once you leave Indy, IndyCar would kill for the ratings and attendance NASCAR has throughout their season.

Yes, NASCAR ratings are down from a couple years ago, but they’re still much better than any IndyCar race outside of Indianapolis.

Several IndyCar races, including the most recent race in Edmonton, drew fewer television viewers than the live audience at Indianapolis. That’s crazy.

It’s equally difficult to pinpoint why Brickyard 400 attendance has been cut in half over the last decade as it is to figure out why the Indianapolis 500 attendance remains so stable.

This is what I routinely hear about Brickyard 400 attendance declines from fans, sponsors and vendors: The novelty of stock cars on the track has worn off; the on-track action is boring with little passing and lots of single-file racing; and this down economy has hurt the lower and middle class NASCAR fans a lot harder than it has other segments.

In that case, I guess the novelty of watching open-wheel cars zip around the 2.5-mile oval will never wear off.

The Indy 500 has a phenomenal history and heritage here. And it is a spectacle—think people watching and food consumption—that goes far beyond the racing on the track.

The one thing that can be deduced from all of this is that the Indianapolis 500 has a long-enduring brand value that should be nurtured and cherished. It must have been a magical set of circumstances that chiseled this event into the consciousness of Hoosiers and race fans nationwide.

And as the Brickyard 400 blows smoke, the Greatest Spectacle can be looked upon with widening wonderment for its enduring horsepower and undeniable staying power.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Something to consider
    At the majority of Sprint Cup tracks (I said majority), you can see all the way around the track if you sit high enough. I quit going to the BY400 (if I couldn't score free tix), but still went to IRP's races simply because I saw more from my seat at IRP and got a better view on TV than I did at IMS. If I pay $85+ for a race ticket, I want to do more than just watch it on the jumbo tron.
  • IMS is the Indy 500
    The folks at IMS really need to see the forest for the trees. The Indianapolis 500 is what people associate IMS with. The Indianapolis 500 is a sport-transcending event. It is part of America's cultural fabric. Maybe it is not a huge swath of it, but substantial enough to be importnat. Anything else is irrelevant. Burl and the crew were there yesterday. The atmosphere was like comparing apples and oranges. The Indianapolis 500 is king. Pure and simple. IMS officials need to treat as such and stop holding other motor racing events at IMS. They just do not fit in. Thsi was my last Brickyard 400. It is an atrociously boring event. With the exception of the restarts, it was like watching Cup practice. I attended the first two Brickyard's and the one Montoya almost one. Now this one. Yesterday's was the worst. IMS serves one purpose...to hold the Greatest Spectacle In Racing.
  • For Pete's Sake
    All of this is designed to make IMS money. PERIOD. The 400 is a BORING race, from it's very first one till as-long-as-they-race here. Nothing short of changing the track is going to fill the stands. Also, how does NASCAR lose by less attendance at Indy? Doesn't IMS pay sanction fees to NASCAR to host such a race? Doesn't that IMPACT the speedways year-end coffers only or does NASCAR get part of the gate??? Anthony, it's hard to believe that that could be possible (NASCAR having control over IMS' gate receipts).
  • Two Things
    1. By removing the grass between pit lane and Turns 1 & 3, racing will greatly improve for IndyCars and Stock Cars. 2. BY 400 TV Ratings > Indy 500 TV Ratings...
  • Everyone knows...
    That 12+ overnights remain only fodder for sweeping generalization. Now if you'll pardon me, I have to buy some Clabber Girl Baking Soda.
  • $6M Nascar Sanction fees
    IMS pays NASCAR $6M in sanction fees for the Curtiss Shaver 400? Bwahahhahahaha! In the IZOD Indycarz, they dispensed with pesky sanction fees last year at places like New Hampshire and Las Vegas. This year, either limited or NO saction fees allow the series to seill race...at places like Toronto, Edmonton, Baltimore, Milwaukee. PLUS, they excluded RA for the China fill in race because RA wanted a discount as well. IMS said NO, and thus that great business decision nets a three week MID SUMMER layoff. Randy should run for POTUS. If you can't sell it, give it away. Just like IZOD clothing specifically branded for the IRL or Indy 500. Great business strategy right thar!
  • Racing not as popular anymore
    One thing that tends to be overlooked is the simple fact the "NASCAR Phenomenon" or fad, if you will, has pretty much run its course, no pun intended. Ten years ago I recall constantly running into people I would never associate as "racing people", who were all exicted about and followed NASCAR. I am still in the same cirlces as then, and what used to be 20-30 NASCAR "fans" is down 3-4. I even know a couple of people who are amazed they followed it and one that is kind of ashamed based on class values and perceptions....NASCAR being sonsidered lower class. Pretty amazing stuff. Add the fact a good third to half of the people who were around ten years ago have moved on and left NASCAR behind with the fact the racing itself is bland and predicatble (not to mention a creepy notion the sport may be contrived in many ways) and it is no small wonder it is in a decline. Mayeb the decline is not a nosedive, but no doubt the sport is suffering a downturn. I watched the race Sunday from Panama City, Florida, at a resort. I was the only one watching in the resort day room. Maybe ten, fifteen people were in there. A couple came by to ask who was winning and watched for maybe five minutes then went back to sunning or shooting pool. Very little interest in that room. At IMS itself, I was stunned to see the incredible swaths of empty seats. There is no question this race is in a significant decline to the point of almost being irrelevant. NASCAR and IMS say they will continue to run the Curtiss Shaver 400 at the Brickyard or whatever it is called they days, but I think they are bluffing and/or in denial. No way that event Sunday had even an iota of success written on it. It looked bleak, uninteresting, and dying. Maybe IMS should let the race go. It makes them money, but hurts the image of the place. Maybe NASCAR is headed to its rightful place once again...a third-tier sport for diehard stock car fans. That is ok. They are lucky, even, as I know so few people who watch it any longer. NASCAR may be on the way out, but it will survive as a smaller, less followed sport.
  • nascar and indy fan
    I'll watch any race the IMS holds...NASCAR or indycar.motogp...Indy car fans come across as snobs...and it shows here..

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT