Colts owner won't allow TV blackouts

August 2, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Relax Colts fans.

There aren’t going to be any TV blackouts this season.

The team announced this week that just under 1,600 remaining tickets would go on sale on a single-game basis.

Despite the team’s attempt to leverage the possibility of blackouts into ticket sales and some local media’s desire to hype that scenario, team owner Jim Irsay isn’t about to let that happen.

Because as much as Irsay talks about protecting the investment of current Colts ticket holders, there’s one interest that trumps all—his own. There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s smart business.

It’s in Irsay’s best interest to sell as many tickets as he can, but it doesn’t serve Irsay or his team to have home games this year blacked out locally. In fact, it would be quite the opposite.

Coming into a season when some fans are still seething about Irsay’s decision to cut Peyton Manning and the conflux of factors that led the team to this point, it would be a public relations nightmare if locals couldn’t watch the Colts on TV. And it’d be a lot of lost exposure for the Colts—coming off a 2-14 season—when they need it most in central Indiana.

Some have pointed out that the Colts have eschewed the NFL’s new policy that if a team's home venue is 85 percent full, it doesn’t have to black out games. Irsay instead is insisting that the Colts adhere to the former rule—that games must be completely sold out or the game isn’t on local TV.

That shows Irsay is serious about this, right? Well of course Irsay isn’t going with the new rule. The Colts had already sold enough season tickets to meet that 85 percent margin, so what incentive would prospective ticket buyers have if Irsay lowers the bar this early in the game.

But if Irsay’s plan to sell more tickets fails and he wants the long-term support of this community—and you know that he does—he’ll buy any remaining tickets himself or broker a cut-rate deal to make sure a sponsor buys them. He could even look heroic if he gives them to local charities.

Consider for a moment, the cost of those 1,600 remaining tickets. For a single game, it’s about $100,000 give or take. How much do you think a two-and-a-half hour TV commercial in the central Indiana market would cost? A lot more than that. And I emphasize ‘a lot.’ Irsay would really only have to come up with the part of that money not set to go in his own pocket per the league's revenue sharing policy.

It would be completely foolhardy for Irsay to let a measly $800,000 stand in the way of letting 100,000 or so Hoosiers watch his team—and hopefully the Colts’ brilliant young quarterback—play on Sundays.

Remember, this is the team whose annual budget is in the nine-figure range. If you spend more than $120 million to put a product on the field, you don’t let less than $1 million keep you from showcasing it to such a large local audience.

It’s true, that Colts officials have to be careful about devaluing ticket prices. The Pacers have certainly struggled with that by having all their games on TV and deeply discounting tickets to fill their home venue.

But there’s a time and a place for everything. And this is a special circumstance for the Colts. Irsay is rebuilding his team. But he also must understand—fair or not—he has to rehabilitate his image and that of his team’s among many fan groups.

This is not the time to let local TV screens go dark during Colts games. It can’t happen, not for a smart businessman. It can’t happen without starting a major uprising among fans and former fans. It can’t happen without damaging this franchise’s image long-term.

That’s why come 72 hours before the Colts home opener on Sept. 16 those tickets will get sold one way or another.

Irsay may need to get his credit card out to make it happen. But Colts fans you might as well start getting your popcorn ready.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Thanks Jim!
    All of us who cannot afford to go the games, but are none-the-less avid fans, are so appreciative of this gesture.
  • Broke
    Maybe he could deeply discount the last ones or maybe give away some to hard working but broke people who cannot afford to go. I would love to take my mom to a game because she is 77 and has never been to a Colts game and cannot afford to go at the current ticket prices.
  • Charity
    Agreed, he would look like a hero if he donated them to charity. Maybe the Peyton Manning hospital (oh the irony!) or Riley or Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Send a bunch of kids to the games and cash in on the positive PR. Agreed, he'd be a fool to let games get blacked out when he is trying to win fans back especially with a young stud QB. It would be disastrous PR otherwise. The one thing this article does not point out is that a lot of the remaining seats are singles in the upper deck. Who wants to go to a game and sit by yourself in the upper deck? No thanks.
  • Thanks JimBo
    Thanks Jimmy, you did have us worried, but deep down I knew it would work out! I can still vac the pool, clean the shed and and do misc. yard work while watching the game! Never miss one while at home, or when at the stadium.
  • Huh, I believe I made that exact comment when this faux story broke. The local media created a firestorm because it sold newspapers, tv ad time etc..... Does anyone remember the Colts BP...Before Peyton? It was not unusual to see weeks where they had to sell 6,000 or more ticks to lift the blackout. Usually a car dealer or grocery store chain swooped in and bought up large bunches to be seen as the saviour. I don't expect there will be many, if any ticks to worry about Irsay buying, they will be picked up by other folks. Again, this was all a none story.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT