Stars and stripes out of fashion at Olympic Games?

August 7, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

I read a report this week about how the United States flag has become a vogue component of Americans’ attire at this summer’s London Olympics.

The report detailed how mere flag waving at Olympic Games used to be the way in which American fans demonstrated their patriotism. But now wearing the flag—as a cape, jacket, skirt, etc.—is the way more U.S. citizens are choosing to scream Yankee Doodle Dandy.

So I’m wondering why there’s a dearth of stars and stripes when it comes to the uniforms of the American athletes themselves?

Someone, please bring back the 1984 U.S. women’s gymnastics team uniforms. At this point, I’d settle for something in red, white and blue. At one point, I thought the Russian gymnasts’ uniforms looked more American than team USA’s.

And the American athletes’ gray warm-up suits are totally beyond my realm of comprehension. They appear to be part space suit, part Army issue. At least they are adorned with a tiny American flag.

It seems obvious that when your primary brand image is stars and stripes, that most if not all your Olympic uniforms should be adorned with stars and stripes. And when your nation’s colors are red, white and blue, it seems obvious that in some combination, your uniforms should be red, white and blue. And for crying out loud, get the shade of blue right. You know, to match the blue on the American flag.

Call me a traditionalist, but I like a design with white stars on a blue background on the top of the uniform with red and white stripes on the bottom. But I’m not a stickler on this. It seems there are enough elements in the American flag to leave room for some creative designs. But don’t leave Old Glory out of the design altogether.

I’m not a marketing major, but it seems like your brand moniker should point to the product itself. I’m not sure what the gray sweat suits say to the world.

If stars and stripes and red, white and blue don’t scream America to the world, then that symbolism certainly does to the vast majority of us in the U.S. of A. And dare I say those symbols still tug at the heartstrings of many who live in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

It’s time to replace the Ralph Lauren mind-set with some good old Uncle Sam common sense. In trying to be fashionably relevant, we’ve made the stars and stripes that help define this country a bit irrelevant.

Let’s do more than raise the flag when we win. Let’s wear it over our hearts every time we compete. That’s a timeless statement that transcends fashion.  
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Fans in stands had the best outfits
    I agree with what you are saying. I think the worst thing was that the uniforms were made in China!!!!!
  • Really?
    So, let me get this straight. It's not enough for our athletes to train for years, sacrifice their time with family, fight through injuries, travel the world to improve their skills, and in some cases, nearly go bankrupt in their pursuits to represent our country at the Olympics? Nope. According to Anthony Schoettle they need to make sure they wear the right shades of the red, white and blue. I guess our athletes aren't jingoistic enough for him. Hey, why don't our athletes tattoo the Constitution on their arms? That ought to do it. U.S.A! U.S.A! (Does Anthony realize he posted this on the IBJ and not his personal Facebook account?)
  • Toning down America
    I'm not sure, but it seems like there was discussion between the USOC and political figures to coordinate "toning down" patriotism so as not to "offend" other countries! It started when Obama took office and started apologizing for "our international behavior"!
    • Don't blame Obama
      Bob, the discussion of the "ugly American" is something that's gone on for decades, so you can't blame it on Obama. Fact is, whether we like it or not, folks in some other countries get really put off by nationalistic displays. Some of this is driven, of course, by historical experience with nationalism (e.g. Germany). I was listening to a BBC discussion today about how the Brits seems to be more outwardly patriotic during these games, whereas it was frowned upon previously.
    • Olympic Clothing
      The only uniform that I have a real problem with is those hideous gray things that they wear while accepting their medals. They look like POW clothing. Perhaps a different designer could be allowed a chance to compete in the next four years.
    • Red, White and Navy?
      Anthony, I was thinking the same thing. What's wrong with red, white and blue?
    • Red White Blue
      Maybe wife beaters and jean cut offs with red bandana for the men and jorts for the women. True Americana
    • Proper attire
      Team uniforms for our Olympians should A) Be manufactured in the United States. No exceptions. No excuses. B) Consist of a navy or royal blue top, emblazoned with "USA" in stylized Red block letters with white trim. For sports requiring pants or shorts, either navy, royal blue, or white. For sports requiring only shorts, same as above. A small American flag should adorn the uniform in a noticeable but otherwise inconspicuous place so as not to appear akward or forced. Example: On the track and field tops, over the left chest. On swimming shorts, on the left side. Warm up uniforms should consist of a whtie top and pants, with navy or royal blue and red stipe down the pant leg and warm up jacket top. "USA" emblazoned across the chest, a moderate-sized American flag on the left sleeve. On the back of the top, a smaller American flag near the top like those seen on some baseball uniforms, with the athletes name in navy or royal blue acorss the back. A navy or royal blue cap with a red "USA" in white trim shall be worn with the American flag on the back near the adjustable band. The USA shall under no circumstances, tone down or diminish in any way our national patriotism to placate other nations or in fear of "offending". For those who think displays of nationalism outside our own country are not practiced, please reference World Cup Soccer or Formula One racing for examples. Go USA!
    • Stop it
      I'm certain the corporations that underwrite the USOC and the athletes much prefer their logo to the American flag on uniforms. It's hard to argue since they're paying the freight. It's one of those privatization things and a consequence is forfeiting control of uniform design.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

    ADVERTISEMENT