ChuckStrong shirt sales raise $62,000 in three days for leukemia research

October 8, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s not everyday that the visiting team agrees to wear a shirt in support of a home team’s cause.

But when the cause is Chuck Pagano, the universally well-like Colts head coach, you can throw all the unspoken rules and traditions out the window.

So it was only mildly surprising on Sunday to see a number of Green Bay Packers wearing T-shirts made by the Colts’ merchandising company, Indianapolis-based MainGate Inc., in support of Pagano, who last week was diagnosed with leukemia.

There was only one request from Packers players. They refused to wear the shirts in Colts blue.

No problem. MainGate sprang into action on Saturday and made a special batch of white with green lettering. The likes of Randall Cobb and Charles Woodson were shown prominently on ESPN and other national television shows going through pre-game drills wearing the shirts.

Colts fans were just as eager to wear the shirts. And they didn’t mind the Colts blue shirts one bit. In fact, thousands paid $20 each for them.

MainGate sold 3,100 ChuckStrong shirts after they went on sale Friday, with the proceeds going to benefit leukemia research at the IU Simon Cancer Center. More than $62,000 has been raised in just three days. That number could easily hit $100,000 for leukemia research this week.

The item was the top-selling item at Sunday’s game, with 1,700 sold at Lucas Oil Stadium, according to MainGate. About1,000 have been sold online.

The shirts will continue to be sold at the Colts pro shops at the stadium and Circle Centre mall and online.

“It was just amazing,” said MainGate CEO Dave Moroknek. “As soon as we filled the rack up, it was empty again.”

  • Not so fast....
    They raised $62,000, but the 'proceeds' are going to research. Isn't it likely that they'll deduct the cost of printing, etc., before they make the donation? Need to ask some more questions, Anthony.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.