Signs point to internal hire to replace Bernard as IndyCar CEO

November 2, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

All signs are pointing toward an internal hire as a replacement for the recently departed IndyCar Series CEO Randy Bernard.

And that’s not because there’s no listing on Monster.com and no “Help Wanted” sign posted in the window at 16th and Georgetown.

The first sign was Thursday’s admission by Indianapolis Motor Speedway CEO Jeff Belskus, who is acting as interim IndyCar chief, that he might be interested in taking on the job permanently.

“I’ve been energized by this role, and as time goes by I get more excited, so let’s see where this goes,” Belskus told IBJ Thursday.

The IndyCar Series has received eight to 10 unsolicited inquiries for the job already, Belskus said. But sources said none of those appear more qualified than three insiders.

The qualifications board members are seeking are: "experience as a CEO, a good businessperson and has experience in sports and entertainment. Experience in motorsports would be a plus but not a requirement," Belskus said.

Belskus served as interim IndyCar CEO when Tony George was fired in 2009, but at that time there was no plan or even mention of lifting the temporary tag. Belskus likely had enough to deal with as the Speedway’s new CEO. Three years later, he appears to be comfortable enough to at least consider taking on more responsibilities.

It’s not clear how the former Speedway chief financial officer would be received as the open-wheel series leader. His calm, steady demeanor could serve him well in the politically-charged position, but he’s not considered a hard-core racing insider despite his tenure at the track. He's certainly not a marketer's dream. And a bigger question mark: how his hire would play with team owners and drivers.

On Thursday, Belskus started reaching out to fans, but as Bernard found out, the IndyCar CEO’s relationship with fans has little to do with success in that position.

Sources inside the series are also saying that the Speedway’s public relations/communications guru Doug Boles, an attorney and former team co-owner and sponsor representative, is being considered for the job.

When I asked Belskus on Thursday about Boles, he said: “I’d think Doug is capable of holding any job here.” He ended that statement with a laugh, but I think we both know it’s not a laughing matter. I also should mention that Boles was listening in on the call.

Boles certainly understands team owners’ perspective, and since up-and-coming driver Conor Daly is his stepson and he’s close to other drivers, he also gets where they are coming from.

It’s unclear how Boles would play with IndyCar fans, an area where Bernard excelled perhaps more than any open-wheel CEO before him. Boles is certainly a capable public speaker and understands marketing.

Boles brings a solid background of working with sponsors. Prior to taking his post at the Speedway in 2011, Boles headed the Indianapolis office of Atlanta-based brand management firm Ignition, whose powerhouse client list included Coca-Cola, Delta AirLines, Arby's Foundation, John Deere and Honda.

Mark Miles, a recent addition to the Hulman & Co. board of directors, is the most intriguing inside candidate sources identified. As the former CEO of the ATP Tour and chairman of the 2012 Super Bowl Host Committee, he certainly has big-game experience.

Miles is a classic powerbroker who should do just fine with sponsors, media partners and other dues-paying constituents. And if you know anything about the men’s professional tennis circuit, you know Miles can navigate a politically-charged landscape.

How Miles would handle the fickle and feisty IndyCar fans is another story. He might be seen as one of the insiders who worked to get the fan-favorite Bernard deposed. And while he’s a consummate professional, he can be brusque—some may even say curt. But he certainly would have the respect of local brass at almost every level.

Some outside candidates also have surfaced, most notably Scott Atherton, who is president of the American LeMans Series and has previously worked for Roger Penske.

But a couple possibilities can be scratched off the list: Just Marketing International CEO Zak Brown said he’s not interested in the job, and the board isn’t interested in former series CEO and ex-Hulman & Co. board member Tony George.

“He’ll continue in an ownership role. He’s not on the board and won’t be involved in management,” Belskus said of George on Thursday.

Belskus told IBJ on Thursday that there’s no short list, and that Hulman & Co.—which owns the series and Speedway—has no intention of using a search firm.

You don’t need a search firm to point you down the hall—or to yourself. You don’t need to compose a short list if you already have a candidate or two ready, eager and at least seemingly capable of stepping in.

Belskus said there’s no timeline to fill the vacant CEO job.

Sponsors and team owners largely agreed it needs to be done by Jan. 1.

And if IndyCar takes the inside track that it looks like it will, it should take a lot less time than that.

For more on the future of the IndyCar Series and Indianapolis 500, see the upcoming IBJ which hits newsstands Saturday. Subscribers can also see IBJ's most recent IndyCar story online starting Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • All is well
    ..."@JennaFryer: OK, I'll say it. Tony George's plan was right. #IndyCar needs to be operated independently of HG/H&C/IMS"....I know Jeff Belskus is trying to paint a smiley face on everything but the negative perception of the series needs addressing ASAP. IF they move from within it will just continue this negativity. Maybe Jenna Fryer is correct. Maybe CART had the right idea all along....because Jeff, we aren't too far from what caused it's creation right now. You are headed up the creek without a paddle IMS.
  • Leader of IRL
    Hopefully, this time IRL can get it right, since, as good as the racing is, the series has performed poorly since the split in '95. The candidates mentioned could execute the role, but they likely need a 2nd in command who is highly respected in the open wheel racing world. All the stakeholders (fans, owners, drivers, sponsors) need to respect the new infrastructure, and it will be hard to find that one person who has all the necessary credentials.
  • Hey, didn't they already FIRE Brian Barnhart?
    Brian's now VP of Operations? The guy is a poison on the sport. How can anyone take this sport seriously when the guy who ran an oval in the rain and sanctioned the Las Vegas debacle and tragedy STILL be employed by the Speedway? PLUS we've learned Brian was handling the negotiations with Dallara for lowering the costs of parts...any surprise nothing ever got done? Randy got fired for that, ya know. Pitiful organization there Mr. Belskus. Pitiful.
  • Big mistake
    Hiring Miles, Boles or Retaining Belskus would cause a big uproar with team owners and drivers. The outcome would be ugly, and another hit to IndyCar's credibility. Take it from an insider.
  • Indy Car Big Mistake
    The Dudes That Run IMS & The Indy Car Series Have No "Balls". Why Not Tell The Fans Why Randy Bernard Is To Be Replaced. He Was The Best Thing That Happened In The Past 25 Years
    • Bernard out of his league
      I love all the fanboi's crying over Ropin's firing. He was far from the best thing to happen to Aow ever. He ignored the owners drivers and especially fans with that choice of stupidity called a Dullara. He was f'ed when he made that choice. I am a hater and love seeing IMMS and the hg family stepping in it again. Told ya so! This is like xmas and birthdays all rolled into one.
    • F1 is ow racing that matters.
      Just watched my fave driver, Kimi Raikkonen, win the GP of Abu Dhabi for Lotus, with the Ferrari of Fernando Alonso and the Red Bull of Sebastian Vettel taking 2nd and 3rd. That's 3 World Drivers Champions on the podium folks. Yes, F1 has top teams, top drivers and world class circuits. Remember when AOWR could legitamately say the same??? Back before the H/G clan "fixed" everything wrong with the sport and brought it to its knees with their "indy is the only race that matters" vision... In 2 weeks, F1 will be in the U.S. for the USGP @ Austin. Finally, something Top Tier OW racing fans in the USA can cheer about. Qualifying may be up against College Fotball, and the race may be up against the NFL, but I bet it does far better than the clown car league could ever hope to if facing the same competition.
    • Seeking Actual Fans
      Isn't it curious and amazing how many children decide to pollute the comment section of any blog that even remotely has to do with IndyCar? The theme is always the same....'the sky is falling,' 'it's doomed,' etc. If it is as bad as you claim, why are you here? What do you have to gain? I am gratified I possess the maturity and sportsmanship not to pollute comment sections of areas of sport with which I have no interest. Perhaps when these kids matriculate to junior high it will get better.
    • What's your point?
      Mature Adults clog up blogs worse with senseless bloviating about nothing. At least some here wish to discuss the horrifying effects IMS has had on the business of AOW and Indy. The series is valued at $5 Million by Tony George his ownself. Heck, he bought Champcar for at least twice that. Champcar, dead but was with twice what the IRL is worth now. Yep, they should have fired Randy before he was hired...
    • I have come to the conclusion...
      ...there will be 100 Indy 500's and The End. Let's enjoy 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016. Four and the door. Car racing is passe in America now and even NASCAR is fading fast. Brian Barnhart and IMS, give us four good ones.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

    ADVERTISEMENT