IU, Purdue having own personal athletics arms race

December 7, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Purdue University Athletics Director Morgan Burke has made a major reversal of field with the hiring of Darrell Hazell. An assist for that change of heart should probably go to Fred Glass, his counterpart at IU.

Ever since Burke was hired as Purdue AD in 1993, he’s been known as a fiscal conservative. Over and over he’s emphasized a pay-for-performance system where coaches were brought in at relatively low pay and were rewardedlater if they piled up wins.

That was the path Joe Tiller and Matt Painter traveled. It was the path Danny Hope was supposed to travel before the losses started mounting.

“We like to bring [coaches] in and let them prove themselves,” Burke told IBJ in 2010. “If they produce, then we’ll consider paying them in the top quartile.”

As the college athletics arms race began to escalate, driving up coaches’ salaries, Burke stood firm by his conservative convictions. And the Black and Gold faithful by and large seemed to appreciate the approach.

By most accounts, Purdue—despite a few rocky years in basketball—was doing just fine in the competitive scheme of the Big Ten. The Boilers battled the likes of Notre Dame on the gridiron. Many years, they finished in the upper third of the conference in football and basketball. They played in bowl games and qualified for March Madness.

Then Glass was hired by IU in 2008. And while Glass was willing to take a pay cut to move from his office at Baker Daniels law firm in Indianapolis to IU’s ivory tower, he was intent on making sure his coaches were getting paid market value—and then some.

He ratcheted up men’s basketball coach Tom Crean’s salary to $3.1 million annually—fourth highest in the nation. He hired unproven Kevin Wilson as IU’s football coach and agreed to pay him $1.2 million annually. Gone was Bill Lynch from IU’s sideline, who at the time was the Big Ten’s lowest paid football coach at about $250,000 a year.

Glass’ philosophy is clear. IU has to spend money to make money and he told IBJ in 2010 that at some point he foresees IU’s football and men’s basketball coaches salaries will be equal. Football, he explained, has too much money-making potential not to invest init.

Notice was taken at Purdue. Painter has gotten raises, though he still makes less than Crean. When Burke fired Hope after this season, he went hunting for a big-name coach. When he couldn’t find one, he still decided to pay big-name money. He had to make a statement to the market and to Purdue followers.

Despite a grand total of two years head coaching experience—at Kent State—Purdue will pay Hazell $2 million a year. Hope was making $950,000. With Lynch gone, Hope was the lowest paid Big Ten football coach. Purdue brass higher up than Burke wouldn’t have it.

If you don’t believe Hazell’s hire was a major reversal for Purdue, consider the following comment by Burke.

“I think where people are somewhat confused is they’re looking at the current compensation package and saying it was an unwillingness to invest more in football,” Burke said of Hope when he was hired. “And that’s not true. We based the compensation package on other people who were similarly situated: moving into a Big Ten job for the first time.”

Color me confused. Isn’t Hazell moving into the Big Ten head coaching ranks for the first time? Yes, he is.

But Burke had his directives. Be competitive within the Big Ten. Show us that you’re going to be competitive. Show us the money.

Burke did just that.

Fred Glass, your move.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Arms Race?
    This is less an "arms race" between IU and Purdue and more recognition by Burke of the realities of big time athletics. His conservative methods, while admirable and appropriate, are no longer realistic.
  • Glass's Move?
    How is the world is it Fred Glass's move now? The key about Indiana is that they didn't just pay Wilson, but they also paid for quality assistants. It appears that with recent recruiting developments that those investments may be ready to pay off. It does not appear that Indiana needs to do anything but stay the course.
  • It's not an IU vs Purdue thing
    I agree with the other comments that this isn't really an IU vs Purdue arms race. It's simply the market realities of BCS level basketball and football programs.There really isn't a next move there for Fred Glass right now. Coach Crean is near the very top of compensation for his job. Coach Wilson is making about what he should be when you consider his lack of previous head coaching experience and what he has done so far at IU. I think where it may be time for Glass to make a move is when/if Coach Wilson has enough success in three or four years that he starts to be mentioned for other jobs with higher salaries. Until he at least takes IU to one or two bowl games he's got little negotiating power to get a significant raise. If Wilson can get IU back to the Mallory level where they are making decent bowl games most of the time I would expect to see a salary increase. Glass will draw bigger crowds with less discounted tickets being sold so the money will be there to double his current salary IF he gets the job done on the field. I'm not sure that I see IU paying a football coach three or four million dollars a year anytime soon with a small stadium but two million or maybe a little more wouldn't be a stretch at all if he produces.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT