Swarbrick, media take beating in wake of Te'o case

January 17, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There’s a great line in the movie “Absence of Malice.”

The lead character, Michael Gallagher, played by Paul Newman, says to a newspaper reporter played by Sally Field: “You don’t write the truth; you write what people say.”

I was 15 years old when I heard that line in 1981 and a few months into my first journalism class at Southport High School. The line immediately struck a chord. I knew it was true.

I thought of that line as I watched former Indianapolis attorney and current Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick standing before a packed press conference addressing the issue of Manti Te’o’s fake girlfriend.

As it turned out, she hadn’t had a bad car accident. She didn’t die of leukemia. In fact, she never existed.

I’m not saying Swarbrick intentionally withheld the truth. Rather, in my best estimation, I’d say Swarbrick was relating the truth as he knows it. I admire him for standing in front of a throng of skeptical reporters and answering every question.

I’m not sure Swarbrick gets high marks for getting out in front of this story, but at least last night he wasn’t running from it. And I don’t think he’s dodging it. At least I hope that’s not the case.

Swarbrick related that he believes that Te’o, the Notre Dame star football player who finished second in this year’s Heisman Trophy voting, was deceived to think he had a relationship with a girl that never existed. Swarbrick says he doesn’t think Te’o is a part of that hoax.

Swarbrick is taking a huge risk in standing firmly behind the Te’o story. He’s putting his own reputation on the line, as well as that of Notre Dame. It doesn’t appear to be something he was compelled to do. He could have chosen to distance Notre Dame from this story.

It didn’t take long for the skeptics to line up to take shots at Swarbrick, who choked up as he related how the deception perpetrated on Te’o has affected Notre Dame’s innocent football star. Swarbrick was getting hammered on social media during his press conference.

For Swarbrick's sake, I hope Te'o is telling the truth. Because there's no more getting the benefit of the doubt. 

And where is Brian Kelly? The Notre Dame football coach is eventually going to have to step out from behind Swarbrick and answer what he thinks and knows about Te’o’s tale. Even though the media fumbled this story the first time around, you can bet they’re going to run with it now, and Kelly, like Swarbrick, will have to stand and deliver.

Swarbrick is far from the only one taking a beating. And for me, as a journalist, that leads to a bigger issue, and back to that line that keeps echoing in my ear: “You don’t write the truth; you write what people say.”

The South Bend Tribune, ESPN and Sports Illustrated also are getting hammered in the wake of this scandal. To some degree, they probably should be.

How could these and so many other media outlets have reported the story that Te’o’s girlfriend had been in a horrific traffic accident and some months later died of leukemia without checking it out?

The story on the Deadspin website made these news organizations seem like The Three Stooges. But I’m not wagging my finger.

It’s easy in retrospect to criticize the news organizations that furthered the lie that Te’o was either snared in or participated in. In retrospect, there were dozens of red flags, from Te’o’s unwillingness to help news organizations get a picture of his girlfriend and put them in touch with her family to not being able to find an obituary of any kind.

All that said, I’m not sure I would ever think to ask for proof if someone told me their wife or girlfriend had died. In fact, I’m fairly certain the thought would never cross my mind.

My mother has told me a million times, “There but for the grace of God go I.”

I’d like to think I would have dug a little bit on Te'o's tale, but if I answer honestly, I probably wouldn’t have doubted his story.

I was on a jury last fall. And it was an ugly case involving child abuse. As a reporter, I’ve learned to look at things critically and skeptically. I questioned everything about the case, and in several instances I stood as the lone dissenter on certain votes. I was pointedly asked if I understood the inner workings of the minds of the people involved in this case.

I answered quickly and instinctively.

“I’m not a mind reader,” I responded. “But I’m a newspaper reporter. I’ve had 25 years experience of people lying to me.”

I answered that question truthfully.

I don’t mean to say that everyone I interview lies. Nothing could be further from the truth. But there are enough people who lie, deceive and bend the truth as a habit or a lifestyle that as a reporter you have to always be on guard.

As reporters, simply "writing what people say” isn’t good enough. It can’t be. Otherwise we are simply agents to perpetuate untruths that seek to be told.

Let’s hope this case serves to remind us of that.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Reporting
    Anthony, Thanks for speaking out about the media's sometimes rush to sensationalize and grandize sports figures. The quote about "Reporters don't print the truth, but what others say ..." should be in the minds of readers of all news.
  • Who Cares
    Whether he was deceived or just told a lie, what does it really matter? The drive by media will report anything, whether it's news worthy or not.
  • Stooges?
    GINA: ... Let me ask you. What will you do if Martine wakes up? Run away like a mouse? JERRY: No, more like the Three Stooges at the end of every movie. GINA: Who are these Stooges you speak of? JERRY: They’re a comedy team. GINA: Tell me about them. Everything. JERRY: Well, they’re three kind of funny looking guys and they hit each other a lot. GINA: You will show me The Stooges? JERRY: I will show you The Stooges. GINA: When? JERRY: Well, I don’t really know where The Stooges are right now but if I locate them you will be the first to know. Looks like deadspin found the stooges.
  • Naive
    Of course Te'o knew about it, it was his buddy that did it and he lied about meeting her on several different occasions. His family was in on the hoax. It was probably an attempt to gain him additioanl votes for the Heisman. ND made a horrible mistake by addresing the issue at all. Why would Swarbrick put his neck on the line? It was totally unnecessary. And the fact that he got "choked up" is laughable. What a sissy. Don't give ND or Swarbrick any credit for doing anything on this one. Kelly was the only smart one in the whole deal.
  • Good perspective
    I enjoyed what you had to say and have sent this on to others. Good lessons.
  • Well Done
    You make excellent points in your article Anthony. And yes, Absence of Malice is a great movie.
  • This is another example of the new 'journalism'
    found throughout what remains of what was once a proud profession based on truth and integrity. No longer! When journalism became oriented towards 'making a difference', truth and objectivity were the first casualties. One needs only look at the coverage of the Obama Administration's actions, and those of many of his appointees, to understand the depths to which journalism has descended.
  • Nice Article and chuckles from the commenters as well.
    Well written Anthony...and thanks for taking your jury service seriously...people lie everywhere, including court (that "whole truth" thing just doesn't stick with a lot of folks)...Pete and Leonardo also get kudos for laughs too...Pete for calling Swarbrick a "sissy" for crying, Jack should know there is no crying among athletic directors (maybe that is why IU and the NCAA both passed him over in the past, he crys too easy)...and Leonardo for his suggestion that we only have to look at how Obama and his administration are covered by "some" of the news media to understand that all the integrity is gone in the "drive-by" media...I am sure Leonardo can inform us where to get accurate news, as I have no doubt based on his comments here that the news he listens to has no slant or bias where the President and his administration are concerned...hilarious comments, I commend them both, and I give honroable mention to the comment with the Stooges references as well.
  • Media spray
    Good column! It might be a good idea to liquify this message and spray the essence on many of the national pundits as a thought cleaner before writing or speaking. It does suggest the old adage, 'walks like and talks like' might need another phrase, smells like to be really "ducky".
  • Reilly
    Somebody please send this post to Rick Reilly ... and Bob Kravitz.
  • 24 hours of news a day
    If we were to go back to the days when the news was on at 7, noon, 6 and 11 only, they might have more quality of news (Quality vs Quantity). The 24-hour a day fire is hard to keep lit so they are constantly on the lookout for a molehile to make into a mountain. This drives the country's fear factor off the map with falsehoods or embellishments. The day before this broke, it was all Lance Armstrong, the "poof" here comes T'eo. Until the next "breaking news".

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT