Indy's competition for 2018 Super Bowl getting ridiculous

February 1, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The competition to land a Super Bowl is always intense.

Indianapolis found that out the hard way, getting jobbed for the 2011 Super Bowl by Dallas, before landing the big game in 2012 on another nail-biter.

The competition for the 2018 Super Bowl is getting down right ridiculous. Indianapolis was the first to officially throw its hat in the ring in early 2012. Coming off what many within the NFL called the best Super Bowl hosting job ever, Indianapolis looked like a strong contender for 2018. Some even were brave enough to suggest the Circle City might get in on a regular host city rotation.

Less than 11 months after jumping into the ring to fight for another Super Bowl, Indianapolis’ ability to secure it in 2018 seems anything but certain. In fact, it now looks like they’re fighting an uphill battle, with some NFL insiders quietly putting their weight behind other cities.

It’s going to take some masterful lobbing by Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay and another super-creative bid to get Indianapolis back toward the lead in this race.

Heading into this week, here’s the list of cities considering bidding for the 2018 Super Bowl: Miami, San Francisco, Houston, Minneapolis and Dallas. Minneapolis and San Francisco are likely to have new stadiums to flaunt. And we all know how the NFL likes a shiny new stadium for Super Bowls.

No city can generate more money for the NFL and its 32 team owners than Dallas, which despite its problems in 2011, can still boast the ability to pack 100,000 people into the Jerry Jones Dome. And we all know how much the NFL likes money.

As if all that’s not enough, the battle for the 2018 Super Bowl became a full-on bar brawl this week, when the NFL “invited,” I repeat “invited” Denver to bid on the 2018 Super Bowl. I’m not sure what you make of the word ‘invite,’ but in my book, that means ‘you are wanted, desired and lusted after.’

Then on Thursday, Greater New Orleans Sports Foundation President & CEO and Super Bowl XLVII Host Committee Executive Director Jay Cicero announced that the group “would like to bid to host the 2018 Super Bowl, timed to the city's 300th anniversary.”

Now that’s just dirty pool. How is Indianapolis supposed to compete with that? We all know New Orleans knows how to throw a party. I can’t imagine what they’ll do to tie it in with its tricentennial. If nothing else, that will bring even more media attention to the Super Bowl, and. the NFL likes media attention almost as much as it does money.

I don’t expect Indianapolis officials to cower from the challenge. 2012 Super Bowl Host Committee CEO Allison Melangton is in New Orleans this week on a re-con mission for Indy’s next bid.

The smallish Lucas Oil Stadium, once thought to be a strike against Indianapolis, might now be considered a big plus. This week, Stadium Journey Magazine ranked Lucas Oil Stadium—for the second consecutive year—as the best U.S. venue to watch a sporting event.

The bids for the 2018 Super Bowl are due in May, 2014. The local host committee headed by Melangton will start working on the bid in June or July, she said.

Hopefully Melangton is gathering some good intel this week. Indy is going to need all it can get to emerge from this vicious fight victorious.



  • Weather was a factor
    Indy did a good job, but had it not been for the flukish 60-degree weather, it wouldn't have gone over as well as it did. Yes, there were the hotels-within-walking-distance and new-fangled Georgia Street walkways (which aren't even used now). Those are great things. But I woke up this morning and it was 7 degrees outside. If Indy hosted a game with all the same positive factors but with weather like we're having today - it would not be touted as the best-hosted Super Bowl. Guaranteed. Everything within walking distance means nothing when no one wants to freeze their booty off.
    • why 2018
      hey why 2018 why not go for 2019 then. Also Denver has an outdoor stadium so double BRRRRR and Minn. while indoor (think they still are) everything else is outdoor. And Miami it has rained everytime they have it so who cares about them. If the stadium isn't as big as Dalls more people watch it on TV which bumps up their ratings even higher!!!
    • I Love L.A.
      Once the stadium is built in downtown Los Angeles, the Super Bowl will be a regular event there, held every other year or every third year, fourth at the outset. The NFL is busy giving other cities "their" Super Bowl in the meantime. They will not get to them all, but they'll get to a few. After 2019, the Super Bowl will be played something like this: 2020 - Los Angeles. 2021 - Dallas. 2022 - New York (a new dome) 2023 - New Orleans - 2024 - Los Angeles again. Repeat. The Indy's, San Diego's, Atlanta's, and Houston's will not even be considered. Indianapolis has held its Super Bowl. The one and only it will ever hold. The Super Bowl will he held like this and the NFL will continue to grow big of britches for another decade or so and then it will be time for the diapers. By 2035, it will be semi-fading in that NASCAR-ish sort of way, popular but not like it was, empty seats and lower ratings, struggling a bit. By 2045 it will be about as popular as today's PGA is. By 2055 it is a relic. Now then, the deaths on the field that are soon to occur with auto racing like regularity may diminsh the sport sooner. Also, a changing culture, one in which nearly everything for the purposes of entertainment will be found in a small, electonic box in a virtual-reality world, compelte with sensory applications to include, odor, taste, and nerve-reaction, will supplant watching others do. Concurrent, the collapse of the American economy as we have known it this past half century or so, will hasten the demise as there will simply not be capitol available to fund folly. There will be an economy but it will preclude billionaire investors paying millionaire charges to play a game not considered note-worthy by all but the two oldest generations. Youngsters will not play either of lack of interest or by prohibition (see game deaths). Indebted and bankrupt schools and their districts will no longer be able to sustain athletic programs of any sort. Youth leagues will exist but barely. Municipalities will no longer be able to provide adequate grounds for the football games. Youth leagues will resemble "vintage" or "nostalgia" contests. Tackling will be prohibited in most of the 45 states left in America. In the Republic of Texas, tackling will be permitted. But suffering from an invasion of Mexicans, escaping the Mad Max decline of that nation, all entertainment capitol will be seized to contest the Border Wars, particularly after France pulls out of defending her to save their own nation from economically being forced to join Germany. The 5 percent who hold the capitol in what is left of America may have "gentlemen's football leagues" behind the gates, relegating exhibitions of the once great game to Sunday picnic outings for the elite, but dust bowl America, will not really care, distracted by their inexpensive "entertainment and occupation" devices, which take them to virtually any place or anything, up to an including an illusory perception they are participating in the, for example, the 2013 Super Bowl as a Raven or member of Destiny's Child.
      • Texas Gone?
        Not too surprising, I suppose. Care to name the other four states you predict will bolt? South Carolina? Mississippi? Alabama? Alaska? Morgan County, Indiana?
      • Nice to see Burl bring his "unique" perspective to something other than racing. And it appears he has about the same accuracy in his predictions
      • Burl?
        Is that Burl or George Orwell?
      • irrelevant
        Detroit Metro Minneapolis-Saint Paul New York Metro And possibly Denver
      • Weather
        Previous comment in response to J
      • Observation
        Wow. Burl, I bet you're a real treat be around at parties.
      • Snow is awesome...
        but I bet the Indy committee will be looking at ways to almost fully enclose and heat Georgia Street for its upcoming application. Perhaps a series of retractable glass panels between the buildings.
        • Burl
          Burl, when is all this horrible stuff supposed to happen, so I can prepare?

        Post a comment to this blog

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

        2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

        3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

        4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.