IU rips page from Butler playbook, uses hoops to raise brand

March 22, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

IU show your stripesIs Indiana University taking a page out of the Butler Bulldogs’ playbook?

It certainly looks that way.

IU is using the NCAA basketball tournament this year to engage its alumni base and promote the school and its academic programs in a very strategic way.

If you’re an IU alum or supporter, your e-mail inbox likely has been filled all week with messages about the Cream and Crimson. But the campaign goes far beyond Indiana borders.

While Butler may not be the first or only school to use its prowess in basketball to shine a light on its academic excellence, the university certainly has become the master at it. Butler also has led the way in showing the importance of Midwestern schools' promoting themselves to East Coast audiences.

During the Big Ten Tournament last week, IU launched a marketing campaign using social media, e-mail blasts, and print and television advertising. This week, in advance of its NCAA opener, the university ratcheted up the campaign with targeted marketing in Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C.

Ads are running in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Washington Post and Foreign Affairs magazine, among others. TV ads have run on the Big Ten Network and ESPN. Ads also have run in Fort Wayne, Indianapolis and other key state markets.

“This year, we’ve been much more deliberate than we have been in the past about using [the basketball postseason] to elevate our brand, remind people why they love IU, and tell them that we appreciate their support,” IU spokesman Mark Land said. “We definitely want to take advantage of the increased visibility of the school due to the [NCAA] tournament.”

The out-of-town portion of the campaign is aimed at IU alums as well as prospective students beyond our borders. The ad messages have a decidedly academic undertone, highlighting IU’s schools of informatics, public health, and global and international studies.

Of course, the ad campaign is also about raising money for the athletic department and overall university.

“We have a lot of alums in these [Washington, D.C., and New York] areas, including a lot of influential ones,” Land said. “They like to see their school on the big stage. We wanted to use this opportunity to capitalize on the energy.”

IU plans to spend a mid-five-figure amount on the campaign. And though IU officials are reticent to discuss marketing plans beyond this weekend, it’s safe to say they’re in place. This is a plan that was coordinated by leaders of the school’s athletic department, academic arm and the IU Foundation, school officials said.

“We don’t want to get ahead of ourselves,” Land said. “The guys in the athletic department would kill me if I started talking about IU making the Final Four.”

But if IU does dust James Madison on Friday, as expected, and defeats the winner of the North Carolina State-Temple game on Sunday, school officials will amp up the campaign another notch—especially in the nation’s capital, where IU would play its regional games.

And if IU makes it to the Final Four, as some are predicting, Land said the campaign would broaden to other markets, including Atlanta, where the Final Four will be played.

“We’ve certainly given some thought to the next three weeks,” Land said.  

The current campaign features IU Athletics Director Fred Glass, IU Foundation President Daniel Smith and the school’s two newest instructors—retired politicians and foreign affairs experts Lee Hamilton and Richard Lugar. One of the e-mails sent out this week features a personal note to school supporters from IU Coach Tom Crean.

Ads featuring Glass and Smith show them dressed in candy-striped pants—and socks—with the tag line “Show your stripes.” The ads featuring Hamilton and Lugar tout IU’s new School of Global and International Studies.

“Last year caught us by surprise,” Land said. “And before that, we haven’t had much to celebrate in a while. So we didn’t want to let this opportunity to raise IU’s image and brand pass us by.”


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.