Critical and potentially expensive off-season decisions loom for Pacers

June 4, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former Indiana Pacers coach Larry Brown said in 1994—following the team’s first run to the Eastern Conference Finals—that the team and its followers wouldn’t know how difficult it was to scale so high up the NBA playoff mountain until years later.

Brown was right. Getting to the NBA conference finals isn’t easy. Getting to the seventh game, as the team did in 1994 and this season, is more difficult yet. Taking the final two steps up the mountain to the NBA championship could be even more difficult.

It’s easy to surmise that this year’s iteration of the Pacers is young, hungry and destined for great things. But the franchise has some hard work ahead of it. Some of that hard work will take place this off-season.

“I’m looking forward to seeing what this team looks like in three months,” West told reporters following Monday night’s game-seven loss at Miami.

A lot of people are looking forward to that. It remains to be seen if team executives can finish what former basketball operations boss Larry Bird started a few years ago. Bird left the team following the 2011-2012 season.

To take the final steps of this quest, Pacers owner Herb Simon will have to open his wallet a bit wider. West, in many respects the heart and soul of this Pacers team, is a free agent this off-season, and league executives think he will be able to fetch $12 million to $13 million per year over the next three years.

West, 32, is currently finishing the second season of a two-year deal that paid him $10 million per year. For his part, West says he wants to remain with the Pacers.

Budding superstar Paul George—sooner or later—will be looking for a max-level contract extension. That will cost Simon another $15 million or so annually. Reserve forward Tyler Hansbrough this off-season becomes a restricted free agent. While certainly not as coveted as West and George, Hansbrough is going to be looking for a low-seven-figure pay raise.

The Pacers also are in need of a top-notch point guard, an on-court quarterback who can get his own shot, and more important, get everyone else into place and distribute the ball accordingly.

That critical move allows George Hill to play his more natural position of shooting guard, and possibly allows Lance Stephenson to come off the bench, giving the Pacers some needed punch for the second unit. Better point guard play should cut down on the Pacers’ turnovers, which hampered the team all season and especially in the Eastern Conference Finals against Miami.

Getting a high-quality point guard won’t come cheap. Simon and Pacers player personnel bosses Donnie Walsh and Kevin Pritchard this off-season will think hard about trading Danny Granger, who has one year left on his contract and is due to make $14 million next year.

While Granger’s knee injury, which kept him out most of this season, will likely downgrade his trade value, he might be attractive to a team looking for a short-term front-court boost and salary cap flexibility after his contract expires following next season.

What the Pacers accomplished on the court in recent years—and especially this year—has been truly remarkable. The 2004 brawl in Detroit has nearly faded out of sight in the team’s rearview mirror.

Now everyone on this team and its fans have their sights firmly fixed on the incline out the front windshield. It won’t be easy. And it won’t be cheap. But vying for a championship never is.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Pacers TV
    Anthony, did the playoff run help Pacers tv ratings compared to playoffs past, and how did they compare to NCAA and Colts?
  • Cost is to Tax payers
    Anthony, "Pacers owner Herb Simon will have to open his wallet a bit wider"...don't you mean Tax Payers will have our wallets opened up wider? Let's be honest here...if the City is already giving the Tax-Paycers $10,000,000 per year (while running a multi-million dollar deficit), they cannot afford the players they have...I just work in finance but where I am from that means you have to spend less, not more.
    • RE: Cost is to Tax payers
      Your comment is completely off base. In order to sustain the positive momentum of this season and ensure profitability, the team must continue to spend on talent. Failure to do so will most certainly result in a return to the red and further calls for public assistance. Then again, it's not clear whether or not your endorse having an NBA team in the city at all. Perhaps you prefer not to have the benefit of collateral revenue for local hotels, bars and restaurants that 42+ home games per year bring.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

    2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

    3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

    4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

    5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

    ADVERTISEMENT