Is Victor Oladipo an NBA superstar or safety net?

June 25, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Victor Oladipo’s rise has certainly been meteoric. Twelve months ago, IU followers were wondering what his potential was as a college player. After two years in Bloomington, it wasn’t clear if the man from Maryland would ever be anything more than an ace defender.

This month, NBA general managers are trying to decide if the Indiana graduate (he earned his diploma in three years) is the No. 1 pick in Thursday’s draft.

To those who have followed Oladipo’s career closely, it all seems a little crazy. He wasn’t even considered the best player on his high school team and was overshadowed a good part of the last two years by IU teammate Cody Zeller.

Zeller is in this draft, too, but no one is talking about him as a top pick. He’s scarcely mentioned as a top five possibility. (He’s projected somewhere between No. 7 and No. 12).

“It may be a bit of a surprise, but in polling them, one constant theme I heard from NBA general managers is that Oladipo is our favorite player in the draft,” said Chad Ford, ESPN college basketball analyst.

But is Oladipo really that good? Is he a future NBA superstar? Or a safety net?

He may be both.

While some NBA executives say it’s not out of the realm of possibility that Oladipo will be selected with the overall No. 1 pick, they’re not going all-in with this bet. Ford thinks the allure of a big man will induce Cleveland to select Kentucky’s Nerlens Noel first, despite the fact that he’s battling a knee injury. Maryland center Alex Len is another big man that could go No. 1.

Still, said Ford, there’s lots to like about Oladipo. He has a 42-inch vertical leap, a 6-foot-9-inch wing span and blazing speed. While his jump shot still needs work, most agree he’s the best defender in this draft. Draft prognosticators seem to think he’ll go no lower than No. 4 to Charlotte or No. 5 to Phoenix.

“He’s [general managers'] favorite because they don’t see him failing in the NBA,” Ford said. “[Oladipo] may be the safest pick in the draft of the top six picks in the draft right now. He’s an elite athlete. He’s already going to be an elite defender on the perimeter.”

But that’s not all.

“He improved dramatically his junior season at Indiana,” Ford added. “He improved his jump shot and his ball handling. He’s such a hard worker. I think people think he’s going to get it and become an elite player at some point in his career.”

Ford isn’t the only one raving about Oladipo as the draft approaches.

Tom Penn, the former vice president of basketball operations for the Portland Trailblazers, said the more time NBA general managers spend with Oladipo, the higher his stock rises.

“He becomes your favorite player when you meet him, when you get to know him as a person,” said Penn, who also works as an ESPN analyst. “The interview process … is a huge part of this. You have to interview with these players, look them eyeball to eyeball. And this kid is the real deal.”

There's little doubt, general managers said, that Oladipo is going to max out his potential.

“So then, the question is, how high is his ceiling?” Penn said.

Penn’s next proclamation may seem even crazier than the thought of Oladipo going No. 1 in this year’s draft.

“It may very well be [his potential is] just as high as this player [Oladipo] gets compared to, and that’s Dwyane Wade,” Penn said. “That’s a bold statement. Nobody thought this about Wade back then. It’s what’s inside. You have to work your tail off. This kid is a worker. He’s got a big, big chance.”  

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT