Irsay drives home points with Twitter rant

August 13, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s difficult to know the motives of someone as unconventional as Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay.

On Monday, Irsay tweeted that he gave his lieutenants an “earful” after Sunday’s poor preseason opener against Buffalo. My first instinct was to dismiss the notion that Irsay really was upset by the performance. After all, it’s the preseason. Who really cares?

And with so many starters either not suiting up or barely playing, how much can you really tell about a team?

Under former President Bill Polian and coach Tony Dungy sub-par preseason performances were the norm. But Polian and Dungy are long gone, and some may have noticed this isn’t the same Jim Irsay that governed during those times.

Irsay is no longer willing to sit in the back or side seat and let his general manager call all the shots.

In a way, it’s ironic to some Colts fans and followers that Irsay is making a big deal about a preseason loss. After all, he let Polian and the Colts coaching staff call the shots in 2009, when the Colts threw away a chance at an undefeated season by laying down against the N.Y. Jets in the team's 15th regular season game. Irsay has smartly noted the backlash that move sparked among fans. A backlash, by the way, that still smolders in some circles.

It’s true that any preseason game is a long way from the significance of any regular season game, but Irsay is eager not to seem disconnected from the fans again—as Polian was in 2009. So he’s not about to act unconcerned about any game—preseason, regular season or otherwise.

There’s likely something else at play here. As long as Polian was around, there was always the feeling—rightly or wrongly—that Irsay was not really in charge.

Irsay has greatly matured as an executive since he hired Polian in 1997. Irsay probably had a lot more to do with decision making during Polian’s tenure than he was given credit for. Remember, in 2002, it was Irsay’s call to hire Dungy, not Polian’s. Some close to the organization have said Polian wasn’t all that wild about the hire.

Still, as Polian appeared to rule with an iron fist, making many decisions concerning draft choices and free agency, the appearance that Irsay was a mere observer lingered.

The matter of who was in charge was settled when Irsay fired Polian and coach Jim Caldwell following the 2011 season. Irsay also fired Polian’s son, Chris, who was seen by some as the heir to Bill’s presidential throne.

I believed Peyton Manning in 2011 when he said he was surprised by Polian’s firing. There were more than a few who were under the misguided notion that Polian was indispensible.

Irsay’s “earful” was about establishing two things. First, that he’s as upset as anyone when the Colts don’t play well, no matter the situation. Suffice it to say, there will be no more laying down of arms if the team is undefeated—no matter how locked up its playoff position is.

And secondly, Irsay wants General Manager Ryan Grigson, Coach Chuck Pagano and, most importantly, the Colts fans to know he’s firmly in command.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Jimmy Irsay Comments
    Probably best if Mr. Irsay is to maintain a positive team/management atmosphere, that he keep his criticism behind closed doors.
  • Dear Jim Irsay.....
    One of my very favorite bosses/people in the world once said to me, "Part of being a good boss means to walk softly and carry a big stick." In other words, he said, "Be comfortable that you are in charge, and don't be the guy who needs to yield the stick at all times?" "Smart people, he said, fully understand who's in charge, and they respect you a whole lot more if you don't feel the need to remind them of it constantly....it's unnecessary and it just makes you seem unstable."
  • Colts Loss
    Hey, Jim! This is Indiana. We don't expect to win in the preseason.
  • If you really think Irsay reamed Pagano and Grigson, then you got suckered in. This was completely and totally a somewhat tongue and cheek tweet to show folks he is not happy with losing. If you follow Irsays tweets, you start to learn his sense of humor.
  • Irsay Comments
    I understand your comments, but when Jim decides to broaden his comments, his private audience of Tweeter folks are no longer relevant, as he decided to increase his audience to a broader audience rather dramatically by vetting it to virtually all media. Basically a management 101 course violation with his comments.
  • Apple didn't fall far from the tree.
    They say sons, if they live long enough, become their father...Jimmy has been trying desparately to prove all along that he isn't his dad...but sometimes he just can't hide his DNA...silly, low class...the league pretty much forced Polian on him back in the day to clean up the mess he was making of personnel...he blew up the team and hired these guys to change things, bring in new personnel, play a different brand...so let them do their job, check your ego. Be the Rooney's and the Mara's and act like you own a multi billion $$ business...don't be Jerry Jones, Tom Benson, Jim Dolan...
  • Great Stuff...
    Proves the point that IBJ readers have their stuff together! All great comments and one's I am sure Jim will be reading.
  • What did he Tweet?
    Why did the article not quote what he said in Tweets? Not everyone does that.
    • Can I get an amen?
      Amen to that Elaine!
    • Bills
      There should be no backlash regarding Mr. Irsays tweet about a terrible Colts performance. It was also a pre-season game for a visiting mediocre Buffalo team who by the way, kicked our tails. It's said frequently that a team is only as good as the next man up. Colts were not prepared. Irsay was right. I'm one fan who is happy to see him say something. As Colts fans, Hoosiers dont demand enough. We are too easy on them. We want our city to be viewed as big time, we need to demand big time results. Watch New England.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

    2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

    3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

    4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

    5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

    ADVERTISEMENT