No city subsidy needed for Indians' profitability

December 4, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Indians have one of the most impressive winning streaks in all of professional sports.

The AAA minor league baseball team this year registered its 38th straight financially profitable year.

That streak of profitability dates back to 1975, when the Tribe was affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds’ Big Red Machine. The pairing with the popular Reds certainly helped drive Indians attendance.

Since then, the Indians have been the farm club for Major League Baseball teams in Montreal, Milwaukee and Pittsburgh.

On the field, the team has had some good years and some bad years. There have been years where the Indians had a roster full of hot MLB prospects and some years when the cupboard was a bit bare.

People are quick to say what a draw Victory Field is. And rightfully so. The picturesque ballpark nestled on the west side of downtown is consistently rated one of the best minor league ballparks in America. But remember, Victory Field didn’t open until July 1996. That means more than 20 years of the Indians’ profitable streak was played in Bush Stadium. Most of those years, the stadium on 16th Street was well beyond its prime. Few would have called it a draw.

But through it all, one thing has been consistent. This team has churned out six- and seven-figure profits.

This year, total revenue increased 7 percent over 2012 to $11.8 million as the economy continued to slug through a weak recovery.

Revenue for the Indians was up in every significant category. Ticket sales rose from $4.56 million in 2012 to $4.81 million this year. Concession income was up from $1.98 million to $2.11 million during the same period. Suite rental was up $24,000 from last year to $956,897, and merchandise sales increased $31,000 to $740,602.

The biggest financial driver was increased attendance, team officials said. The Indians finished their 2013 season with the highest overall regular-season attendance of all 176 Minor League Baseball teams.

This year, the Indians drew 637,579 fans (8,980 per game) through the turnstiles, a 7-percent increase from last year. The Tribe’s home attendance was the fourth-highest in Victory Field history and the best single-season total since the team’s championship campaign in 2000. This year’s attendance wasn’t far off the Indians’ record home attendance of 658,250 in 1999.

Victory Field saw a record-setting eight sellouts this season, which surpassed the previous high mark of six capacity crowds in 1997. The Indians this season hosted 25 crowds of 10,000 or more spectators.

The current recession might actually be helping the Indians, sports business experts theorize. With family budgets stretched thin, the relatively low price of tickets for an Indians game looks pretty good compared to other entertainment options.

Fans aren’t the only ones flocking to the Indians.

As professional teams at many levels struggled with advertising and sponsorship sales, Indians ad revenue grew from $2.67 million in 2012 to more than $3 million this year. That’s a 12.5-percent year-over-year increase, a number that any major league team in any sport would love to post.

It’s quite a performance by a team that doesn’t get nearly the same amount of press as its major-league neighbors.

“We’re really pleased with the way the season turned out,” said Indians Chairman Max Schumacher. “A lot of credit goes to our sales and marketing team and really our entire front office staff.”

The only downer for the Indians is that expenses increased slightly faster than revenue. The team was still plenty profitable, but its profit dipped from $1.57 million in 2012 to $1.41 million this year.

On the whole, the Indians’ operating expenses increased from $9.11 million last year to $9.93 million this year. That’s a 9-percent increase, and if I know Schumacher and Indians General Manager Cal Burleson as well as I think I do, they’ll be giving those expenses close scrutiny this offseason.

But don’t expect wholesale cuts. Schumacher and Burleson understand they have to spend money to make money, and they’ve never been shy about making improvements to the ballpark. The duo puts a premium on the fans’ game-day experience, and they won’t jeopardize that.

The two biggest cost increases this year came in the team’s advertising and promotions budget, which increased from $2.1 million last year to $2.43 million this year, and the grounds operating budget, which grew from $4.15 million to $4.46 million. General and administrative expenses saw a slight increase from $1.94 million to nearly $2.1 million.

It’s important to note that the players’ salaries are covered by their MLB parent team, the Pittsburgh Pirates. That’s certainly a part of the Indians’ financial success story. Still, if they played hardball with the city, they could make even more.

It’s notable at a time when sports organizations such as the Indianapolis Colts, Indiana Pacers and Indianapolis Motor Speedway have come to the city for financial assistance, the Indians have chosen not to do so.

The Indians consistently find themselves in the black while paying the city of Indianapolis $500,000 annually to lease Victory Field, paying for all operational and capital expenses at the ballpark and receiving no public subsidy.

The Indians finished last season at 80-64 and won their division before getting knocked out of the playoffs by eventual International League champions, Durham, in the playoffs.

  • Glenn Ray
    I would like to say that we have Glenn Ray and the other 6671 people who stepped up in the 50's and bought the Indians. Glenn,who was an executive with IPALCO was very involved in the finances of the team after that.
  • More Dates at The Vic
    The city would benefit greatly if Victory Field hosted more events. Concerts, parties, special events and other sports. If I were re-negotiating their lease, I would include provisions that incentivize more activity in a place where the city has great infrastructure and the amenities to handle such events.
  • Question for Anthony
    Anthony - I see a lot of your articles express the need for CIB/Indy to assist the Pacers financially due to consistently losing $ year after year, but have never seen that compared to the increased value of the Pacers organization over the years. Typically with pro sports teams, and all businesses, it's very common to lose money each fiscal year, but the franchises/companies value continues to increase. I'm sure Mr. Simon can make a hefty profit by selling the Pacers if he so chooses. Look at ExactTarget. They show a loss at the end of each year, but were recently purchased for $2.5B. So why do we look so closely at the end-of-year red or black as the reason to financially assist them when that's not the big picture and the only factor? Curious as a sports, city of Indy and Pacers fan. Good article here on Indians. Glad you give credit where it is due for a company that is ran so well and asks for so little.
  • A Lesson To Learn
    Jim Irsay and Herb Simon should study how the Indians get it done on their own year after year and apply that to their respective organizations. Have the Indians ever threatened to leave town?
  • Class act
    Just want to toss in that Max Schumacher is a class act and often overlooked as one of the city's finest. Keep it up fellas. Lots of families spend wonderful time together thanks to you.
  • Congrats!
    Congratulations to the Indians organization. They do an excellent job of offering entertainment at a reasonable price. Keep up the great work!
  • Not to take anything away from the class act that is the Indians, but you take away player salaries from any team and they are going to do better financially. Also there is a major economic difference between minor league and big leagues. Indians are one of the most successful and long lived minor league teams. But outside of Indy, few know who they are. Not the same with Colts or Pacers.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by