Pacers' hard-earned success requires continued vigilance

February 12, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As chronicled in a story in the most recent IBJ, the Indiana Pacers are red hot this year. They have the best record in the National Basketball Association and team officials seem to have dug themselves out of the abyss they were in for what seems like the better part of the last decade.

Friday’s home game against the Portland Trailblazers was the team’s 16th sellout this season. That’s as many as the team has had in the previous two seasons combined

So far this year, the team is averaging nearly 17,300 fans per home game. If that pace continues, it will be the highest attendance mark in 13 seasons.

Overall, attendance is up 19 percent this year—the second-biggest increase of 30 NBA teams. Ticket revenue is up more than 20 percent.

Through 45 total games, TV ratings of games televised on Fox Sports Net are up 138 percent over last season. That’s the highest regional TV ratings increase among NBA teams.

It’s almost easy to forget the Pacers averaged a league-worst 13,538 in attendance during the 2010-11 season. The Pacers bottomed out at 12,221 during the 2007-08 season.

The Pacers weren’t playing the best basketball during those down times. But there were certainly other factors at play that led to that slide.

It’s easier still for the casual observers, and perhaps even some of the players who haven’t been here all that long, to forget just how much work it took to clean up the team’s image and put it back on this road to prosperity.

The Pacers—and most especially the team’s young players—must remember the types of gains achieved by this team are hard earned and delicately maintained. Especially in a family-oriented—some would say fickle—market like Indiana.

That’s why the timing of stories about Paul George’s escapades with a stripper last summer is especially bad. In some markets this type of thing would roll over the team like water off a duck. But this is Indiana. And fans seem to care not just how good the players that represent their state’s teams are at the games they play, but they also want them to be stand-up citizens.

I’m not here to judge Paul George. And I’m not saying he’s not a stand-up guy. But some of the details of the story are less than flattering. I won’t go into the details here.

Rightly or wrongly, folks in this market are going to view George in a little dimmer light now. I’ve already heard several fans say they’d rather have their children wear a different player’s jersey.  

And before people jump the case of judgmental Hoosiers, remember, Pacers executives have sold this team on the basis that not only are these good players, they’re good guys. If I’ve heard that once, I’ve heard it a thousand times in the past two years.

I’ve heard it from Pacers owner Herb Simon. I’ve heard it from team president Jim Morris. And last week I heard it from the team’s sales boss, Todd Taylor. On the whole, I think they’re right.

As a lifelong Indiana resident, I know my Hoosier brethren can wag a disapproving finger. I’ve also known them to be fairly forgiving. I sense they’re prepared to let the George incident slide and chalk it up to a youthful indiscretion.

And why not? As near as anyone can tell, George broke no laws. This doesn’t nearly rise to the level of previous indiscretions by former Pacers players.

But if another incident comes along—especially concerning George, this incident will be brought up again and probably magnified by a mostly cordial local press corps.

All might be forgiven this time. But not forgotten.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Moralist
    Way to wag your finger at George while saying your not wagging your finger at George. Nice Job.
  • finder wag
    Adam, I'm wagging my finger at you. I think you completely missed the point of the post. It's a commentary as much on the fan base as it is on the player.
  • Good Point, Matt
    Matt nailed the issue well chronicled by Anthony. The Pacers are a BRAND selling in a market proven to demand the product described in the article itself. Reggie Miller raised both flags and fan support in strengthening that base which was ripped apart in Detroit and its aftermath. To conveniently overlook this as a benchmark for the Pacers brand is like not recalling life in the Reagan years compared to today.
  • To be in his shoes
    So you are 24 years old, making 18 million bucks a year, you are 6'9", good looking, famous, hormones in overdrive, and women are everywhere, and the finger waggers are suggesting that he needs to stay home and have milk and cookies?... we can all say what he should have done (can anyone say condoms at the very least?), but I get so fed up with a bunch of old farts tsking away at some kid for bagging a stripper like they have never been in one of those places...please...the ghost of Reggie Miller my eye...anyone remember the Gold Club in Atlanta?...I think Reggie might have been there once or twice including one night that Patrick Ewing was also there that ended up in the tabloids...everybody seems to still love Magic Johnson, but I recall the HIV announcement like it was yesterday. Those guys were well into their career when that all happened too...Let's see how Mr. George learns from his mistakes, instead of wagging fingers and acting holier than thou...he isn't perfect, but he is no worse than a lot of us would be if we had a bottomless bank account and women all around...Charles Barkley was right...Athletes should not be your role models, so Mom, get your kid a Fire Truck or a Fireman's hat instead of a jersey if you don't like it. As for the brand, if it hurts momentarily, then it does...if they win a title, it won't matter much...the city only turned on the Pacers after the brawl...lengthy suspensions led to a lot of losing (Artest was a very popular player before the brawl, a lot of people still like him here in spite of it)...bad players to replace the screwups led to a lot of losing...losing had far more to do with the fans deserting than anything else...it was convenient to say the players were punks(some of them were, certainly), but Hoosiers are tight with a buck anyway, that was just the excuse a lot of people used.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT