Ballard invites British royal couple to visit Indy's World Sports Park

February 17, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard certainly has some out-of-the box ideas. When it comes to the new 48-acre Indianapolis World Sports Park on the city’s east side, some might even say his ideas are out of this world.

Ballard recently proclaimed that he and his staff are in the process of trying to lure international dignitaries to Indianapolis for the national cricket championship to be played at the World Sports Park in August.

If you’re going to go fishing, I guess you might as well fish for the big ones. So Ballard reached out through the British Consulate to invite Prince William and Kate Middleton to visit the World Sports Park this summer. City officials, however, said William and Kate had to respectfully decline.

Undaunted, city officials said the mayor is putting out invitations to other high-level international dignitaries to see the Indianapolis World Sports Park, which the city paid $6 million last year to construct. The theory being that a visit from a high-level international dignitary (or two) would bring in more publicity for the new facility and the city.

The five multipurpose fields at the new facility are designed for soccer, lacrosse, hurling, rugby, Australian rules football and Gaelic football, in addition to cricket. It is also set up to accommodate 10,000 fans for big events.

Ballard thinks having more facilities like the World Sports Park that appeal to an international audience will help not only draw international visitors to the city but international companies and workers as well.

Already, Ballard insists, the investment in the World Sports Park is paying dividends. A flurry of positive press in places like India, Africa, Europe and the Caribbean nations—plus an agreement with the USA Cricket Association to host the men’s national championship here in 2014, 2015 and 2016—show the World Sports Park is a good investment, Ballard said. Next year’s USACA National Championships will be Aug. 21-24.

Ballard is hopeful that the USACA National Championships is just the type of event that could draw in high-level dignitaries from nations that love cricket.

Selling an international audience on the merits of the World Sports Park might be easier than selling it to Indianapolis residents. Of course, Indianapolis residents are the ones paying for it.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • 6 million dollar park
    Mayor Ballard does not care about the homeless he only cares to take care of the rich and business.My church and another take care of the homeless and Ballard does not want us to do that.He would like to see them die or go to some other city. What is wrong with are morels.This mayor does not CARE.
  • Ugh
    Why are his advisors letting the Mayor talk publicly? He always says something dumb when that happens. If the cricket stadium was not enough of a fiasco, Mayor Ballard took it up a notch.
  • Mushrooms
    Jonny - Morels are mushrooms. You may have meant morals. And I'm not the biggest fan of this Mayor but it's quite a stretch to associate his apparent affinity for cricket with a lack of empathy for the homeless. See them die? Really? Personally, I'd like to see more of them enter the workforce, but I doubt that anyone really wants them to die.
  • Sad or Funny
    This is so sad. Borderline delusional. Why would the Mayor's press people even allow this to be released. Can anyone imagine Daniels doing something like this? Never.
  • Go Big!
    I'm sorry, but I've liked this idea from the start. Those of us who have been NBAed and NFLed to death (speaking of only caring for the rich and famous!)need something to give us hope. Remember when soccer was an exotic and unfamiliar sport? Not to mention every college campus in the state pratically has a rugby team.
  • Sports Park
    What a joke...cricket anyone?...anyone? Thought so. If the royals show up make sure you have plenty of fried food and PBR...let's show them some Honest to Goodness Hoosier Pride.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT