One way or another, Pacers fans want off roller coaster

May 6, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Pacers are a tease.

And their fans are tiring of it.

My wife surprised me Monday night after Game 1 between the Pacers and Washington Wizards when she proclaimed “I wish the Pacers had lost to the Hawks.”

The Pacers beat the Atlanta Hawks four games to three in the first round of the playoffs, and it may have been an extreme reaction in the immediate post-game let down, but I think my wife—a lifelong Hoosier and relatively rabid sports fan—echoed the sentiment of more than a few Pacers fans.

The Blue and Gold faithful are tired of the mind-blowing let downs they’ve experienced in the last couple of months in general and in the post-season in particular.

Local fans are savvy enough to realize there are going to be some setbacks on the road through the playoffs. But it’s not like the Pacers are losing to great opponents.

The Pacers first two playoff opponents could be classified as mediocre. For all the props Washington gets for being a young up-and-coming team, I’m not at all convinced the Wizards could beat any of the teams remaining in the Western Conference.

The Pacers, meanwhile, are simply laying eggs. And the fans—a good many who departed Bankers Life Fieldhouse well before the game ended—realize it. (For the record, I never promote leaving a game, any game, before the final whistle blows.)

Maybe it wouldn’t sting so badly if the Pacers didn’t tease their fans with flashes of their true potential. Many Pacers followers felt after games 6 and 7 against the Hawks, the team was finally out of its slump and on its way to a re-match with the vaunted Miami Heat.

Then came Game 1 of the Washington series and it was—to quote Yogi Berra—déjà vu all over again. Ugh. It was a game which sadly had some Pacers fans wishing this nauseating roller coaster ride was over.

It’s too bad for the Pacers from a business perspective too. This is the time of year when an NBA team wants to put its best foot forward. It’s the time of year that a lot of people are sampling the NBA product. It's the time of year, that even if you lose, you want to go down valiantly showing you have promise for next year.

The Pacers have sold out each of their five playoff games so far, and have attracted a much bigger TV audience than normal. Some of those ratings might have even surprised Pacers and network officials.

Consider, the Pacers first-round playoff games this year generated three of the six all-time biggest TV audiences to watch a Pacers game on Fox Sports Indiana. That goes back to 1996.

Game 6 of the Pacers-Hawks series scored a 10.4 rating (115,000 households) and peaked at 14.6 (160,000 households) on Fox Sports Indiana. That’s the highest rated Pacers game on the cable network, and more than double the audience size for a Pacers regular season game. Even more central Indiana residents tuned in (125,000 to 145,000 households) to Game 7 against Atlanta on Saturday and Game 1 against Washington Monday on TNT.

The Pacers sales staff is fervently trying to use this postseason to ramp up sales for next year. On Monday, I’m not sure the Pacers players gave sales boss Todd Taylor and his staff much to sell.

Of course, one game does not make a series. And I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Pacers rise from the ashes in Game 2 on Wednesday at Bankers Life Fieldhouse. As of 11 a.m. Tuesday, only 500 tickets remained for the game, and Pacers officials are confident it will sell out.

Beyond that, who knows?

One thing is certain, though. It’s crunch time for this Pacers unit.

It’s time for them to prove they’re true championship contenders. It’s time once and for all for this group of players to win over this community the way the Pacers of the late 1990s did. Because I’m not sure Pacers fans have the stomach for many more emotional free falls.





 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT