Thinly traded Indians stock delisted by NASDAQ

June 4, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Indians were recently delisted from the NASDAQ Pink Sheets, but team officials say it should have little to no impact on the AAA baseball team or its business operations.

It could, however, have a significant impact on Indians shareholders.

The Indians have "no relationship" with NASDAQ officials and made no payments to be listed on the Pink Sheets, said Bruce Schumacher, the team's vice president of corporate affairs.

"There just weren't very many transactions," he said of why the stock was delisted.

While publicly traded companies often get delisted for financial troubles or filing issues, that wasn't the case with the Indians, said Mark Foster, chief investment officer for Columbus-based Kirr Marbauch & Co.

"To be listed, a company must have a market maker submit an application to NASDAQ and agree to make a market in that stock," Foster said. "In cases like the Indians, the stock is so thinly traded, there isn't a willing market maker. "

The delisting certainly had nothing to do with the team's financial status or stock value. The Indians have been profitable for more than a quarter century and in recent years have churned out annual profit of about $1 million.

The few recent trades that have occurred have been in the $30,000 per share range, which would put the valuation of the team at about $22 million. Several analysts involved in minor league baseball think that valuation is low.

The impacts of the delisting on stock holders will vary. For one, "the delisting gives stock holders one less avenue to sell their stock," Foster said.

The delisting also could give a boost to the team's buyback program. For the better part of the last decade, the Indians have been offering to buy back any stock holders' shares. Those shares are then retired and the remaining shareholders then own a bigger percentage of the team.

The Indians are currently offering shareholders $30,814 per share via the team's buyback offer.

"When the stock is delisted and there are no market makers, it's tricky to determine the value of the stock," Foster said. "That's not a great scenario for shareholders.

"The delisting might make the team's buyback offer the best option to sell," he added.

That scenario in the long run could benefit those who decide to stay in the game.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Wait, they're still called "Indians"?
    Shouldn't we consider changing the name of the team? And of the city? And the State?
    • Good Call
      Sounds like a great project for you to start working on, Scott. Let all of us know how that goes.
    • On what basis
      On what basis should the Indians, city or state change their name? Are you saying that Indian disparages native Americans in the same manner as redskins? If Indians is in fact offensive, I'm not apposed to a change, but I don't remember hearing the complaint. Personally, I think the way the baseball team uses their nickname is respectful. They don't use offensive imagery, stereotypical war chants or tomahawk chop silliness. Actually, at my last visit I thought they were beginning to push the pirates imagery. Maybe a foreshadowing of a name change to the Bucs? It made me wonder....

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT