Painter's realistic approach turns Purdue into power

October 7, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

You won’t catch Purdue basketball Coach Matt Painter looking too far to the future. And you won’t find him flying high on his own success.

At this morning's IBJ Power Breakfast, Painter spoke openly about the successes, failures and uncertainty of being a big-time college hoops coach.

An audience member at today's event asked Painter if he sees himself as a 25-year Purdue man, in the mold of his predecessor, Gene Keady. Painter, who must be watching his weight and didn’t eat any of the flavorful French toast (No, I’m not trying to take Lou Harry’s job), didn’t bite on the question either.

“Looking forward 25 years is crazy,” Painter said. “We’re focused on this year. We’re focused on what we need to do today to win.”

Good answer, coach.

Painter, in addition to becoming a proven winner, is proving to be a grounded realist. He has the type of characteristics that would make him a solid CEO in any sector.

Painter pointed out that things change; university athletic department and academic leaders change—and basketball coaches, win or lose—change and move on.

Don’t get me wrong, Painter, a Muncie native and Purdue grad, bleeds black and gold. And the Boilermaker faithful bleed for him—at least for now. He’s taken the team from the Big Ten cellar to the upper echelon in five short years.

Painter has succeeded by being realistic.

“I know Purdue isn’t sexy,” he said after fielding more than a few IU-related questions. “Our brand is blue collar. That’s good. That means we’re getting recruits who want to come here for the right reasons.”

Another point scored for Painter.

He too understands that while Purdue is improving its athletics facilities, it’s losing the arms race to the likes of Ohio State, Michigan and yes, even Indiana. He pointed out that Purdue lacks some of the practice and workout facilities that its nemesis to the south now has.

He isn’t lamenting or focusing on that. But again, he is a realist.

If it was up to the parents, the decision on where a prospect goes would always come down to academics and people in the program, Painter said. I’m not sure about that. But point taken.

Most of us in business depend on co-workers—be they bosses, peers or minions—to get our jobs done. Painter’s livelihood hinges largely on the decisions and actions of teen-age and 20-something kids. That sort of thing can keep a man (or a woman) up nights. Painter’s realism again serves him well.

“We have to focus on getting our message out, and staying true to what we are,” Painter said. If Painter hears footsteps coming from Bloomington (or from the Butler campus), he’s not letting on.

He knows the rise of those programs will make his recruitment of the best Indiana and Midwest basketball players that much more difficult. He said he’s looking forward to being pushed harder.

Always gracious, Painter has nothing but praise for IU Coach Tom Crean, calling what he’s done “unprecedented.”

“He had one walk-on player on his roster in November and was expected to put a competitive team on the floor in November,” Painter said. “There’s no manual for that. What he did was unbelievable, and they’ll get better.”

But clearly Painter isn’t thinking too much about Crean or IU. He’s focused on today—and what he can do to make his team better.

At the end of today’s IBJ Power Breakfast, he was clearly thinking about getting back to West Lafayette. Maybe that’s why Purdue is one of the Big 10 favorites this year.

Maybe his relentless pursuit of excellence and uncommon sense of what’s real is why Painter could some day stand alongside Keady and Ward “Piggy” Lambert as one of the best coaches Purdue has ever known.

Even though Painter isn’t willing to look 25 years down the road, many Purdue fans are. And the former Purdue player turned coach is making black and gold faithful believe what they imagine could well become real.

  • Anthony,

    To claim that Purdue is losing the facilities battle to IU is simply laughable. Do a little research and you would quickly see that Purdue has spent far, far more on athletic facilities in the last 10 years than has IU. A $70 million renovated football stadium, a new olympic pool and diving well, 2 new golf courses (one by Pete Dye), a new tennis facility, new football practice fields, a renovated volleyball facility that seats 2,500 and regularly sells out, etc. Additionally, Mackey Arena is presently undergoing a $100 million expansion and renovation which includes new practice gyms, weight rooms, athletic training factilies, and academic facilities.
    Frankly, your IU bias has you viewing the world through crimson colored glasses. Unfortunately for your credibility, those glasses are broken.
  • Don,

    I think the implication both Anthony and Coach Painter made was specific to the current facilities level in basketball only. Given that context and the following statement about practice facilities, laugable is far from an appropriate term, nor do I think it was slanted toward IU.

    P.S. I am a Purdue fan, so no cream and crimson colored glasses here.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by