For Colts, better to be lucky than good

November 9, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sitting at yesterday’s game it occurred to me—again—just how financially fortunate the Indianapolis Colts are.

Colts officials are cashing checks from their 20-year, $121.5 million title sponsorship deal for Lucas Oil Stadium while Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones is still hunting for a title sponsor for the eighth wonder of the world down in Texas.

The Colts have multi-year (most of them seven years or longer) leases for all but a handful of 137 luxury suites, while the Jets and Giants recently hired an outside firm to help sell suites in their soon-to-be-open new home.

Colts officials didn’t sell five or so suites on a multi-year deal so they could sell them on a game-by-game basis. It’s good business to have a broad crowd sampling the stadium’s most expensive product. With all the other suites sold out for years, it creates a real feeling of exclusivity people want to be a part of.

Those multi-year leases deals bring in between $40,000 and $275,000 annually for the Colts, and that’s before you figure in parking, food and other ancillary sales.

The economy has indeed hit the once iron-clad National Football League. But the Colts have almost completely sidestepped the financial blitz.
Indianapolis is one of 11 franchises in the 32-team NFL that so far this season is averaging at least 100 percent capacity at its home games. Through the first half the season, the Colts are averaging 104.7 percent of capacity, bringing in just under 66,000 per regular season game.

On a percentage basis, the Colts are second to only Dallas, who is stuffing 122.3 percent of capacity into its behemoth facility. They must really be jamming them in those luxury suites. New Orleans is third on a percentage basis, filling the Super Dome to 102.8 percent of capacity.

All 32 teams on average are filling to 96.1 percent capacity. Hardly a crisis to jump up and down about, but still it’s a nearly 3 percent decline from last season, and for the NFL, that’s pretty eye opening. And remember, the Cowboys' ridiculous numbers in their new stadium are skewing everything up at least a couple percent.

Yes, it’s true big-market teams like Washington and New York still bring in 10,000 plus more fans per game than the small-market Colts. But all in all, the Colts are doing just fine.

Sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good. And I’m not saying the Colts sales staff isn’t good, because I think they’ve played all the cards they’ve been dealt just right.

But if Lucas Oil Stadium is built  just a year later, there’s likely no stadium sponsor, there’s probably a lot more vacant suites the sales team is hustling to sell on a game-by-game basis, that air of exclusivity would deflate faster than the old RCA Dome roof, and the financial fortunes of this team look a whole lot different.


  • For the Colts it was both. Good and lucky. Good product on the field, coupled with good and lucky in the sales office. The story of Zupancic pitching to Lucas Oil even though he did not think they would bite is a great story that any salesman should think about. You may not think your customer can afford what you are selling, but give him your best pitch and you might be surprised.
  • Colts rules
    Colts rules and they're going to win the superbowl! lamination montreal

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.