Sales soaring at Colts' Lucas Oil Stadium shop

November 11, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s hard to imagine better weather to peel the roof back at Lucas Oil Stadium than Indianapolis Colts fans enjoyed Sunday for the Houston Texans game.

Sunny skies and temperatures in the high 60s with a gentle breeze put a smile on many of Colts' fans faces.

But there’s at least some who were hoping Mother Nature would dial down the thermostat.
 
The Sunday before—the Nov. 1 game against the San Francisco 49ers—a chill in the air made the cash registers in the Colts Pro Shop on the north end of the stadium ring more often than ever.

The folks at Indianapolis-based MainGate, who manage the store for the Colts, said they sold more goods during the 49ers game than during any other day since the stadium opened last fall.

Apparently Colts fans are still adjusting to life outside the comfy confines of the temperature controlled RCA Dome. MainGate officials reported a run on jackets, sweatshirts, blankets and gloves before and during the 49ers game.

One shop worker said when the store ran out of gloves, Colts fans began buying socks to put over their hands. Apparently Peyton Manning isn’t the only one inside the stadium capable of calling an audible when necessary.

The shop was also rocking before and during the Texans game with shoulder-to-shoulder traffic being the norm. It was so crowded 30 minutes before kick-off, scores of people turned away because they simply couldn’t get in the door.

Overall, stadium pro shop sales are seeing a double-digit percentage increase over last year with the last two games pushing sales increases to around 20 percent.

“Sales are strong and we are seeing increasing sales as the season continues,” said MainGate CEO Dave Morknek.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Great!
    I love outdoor football and hope that the roof at LOS is opened as much as possible.
  • chief
    Now all they have to do is get the rodent problem under control and all will be good. Seriously, the merchandise sales does demonstrate how strong this brand is even in economic bad times, it's selling.
  • The news reports about the rodent issue have been spotty at best on facts. Channel 8 said the problem was first found in December and continued into March. So have there been new issues? If it was problem 9 months ago, why bring it up during November sweeps?

    As one heath inspector told me years ago, the average household kitchen harbors more germs and unsafe food handling then most of the dirtiest commercial kitchens.
  • rodent doo-doo
    If the problem has been lingering since last December, yikes! It should be reported.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT